What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Biodiversity
His scientific interests lie mostly in Mangrove, Ecosystem services, Ecology, Ecosystem and Climate change.
His study focuses on the intersection of Mangrove and fields such as Biodiversity with connections in the field of Middle East.
His Ecosystem services research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Ecology, Deforestation and Recreation.
His Ecosystem study incorporates themes from Carbon sequestration, Machine learning, Intertidal zone and Species diversity.
As a member of one scientific family, Daniel A. Friess mostly works in the field of Intertidal zone, focusing on Habitat and, on occasion, Sea level.
His research in Climate change intersects with topics in Agroforestry, Greenhouse gas and Water resource management.
His most cited work include:
- Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012 (335 citations)
- The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise (326 citations)
- Are all intertidal wetlands naturally created equal? Bottlenecks, thresholds and knowledge gaps to mangrove and saltmarsh ecosystems (187 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Mangrove, Ecosystem services, Ecosystem, Environmental resource management and Ecology.
His Mangrove study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Agroforestry, Biodiversity, Deforestation, Blue carbon and Greenhouse gas.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Range, Livelihood, Habitat, Environmental planning and Recreation in addition to Ecosystem services.
His Habitat course of study focuses on Intertidal zone and Salt marsh and Shore.
He works mostly in the field of Ecosystem, limiting it down to concerns involving Climate change and, occasionally, Sea level.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Urbanization and Ecotourism.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mangrove (70.63%)
- Ecosystem services (39.86%)
- Ecosystem (32.17%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Mangrove (70.63%)
- Ecosystem (32.17%)
- Ecosystem services (39.86%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Mangrove, Ecosystem, Ecosystem services, Blue carbon and Environmental resource management.
His Mangrove study is concerned with the larger field of Ecology.
His Ecosystem research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Agriculture, Biodiversity, Climate change and Intertidal zone.
His studies deal with areas such as Range, Macrobenthos, Salt marsh and Threatened species as well as Ecosystem services.
His studies in Blue carbon integrate themes in fields like Climate change mitigation, Greenhouse gas, Wetland and Environmental protection.
The various areas that Daniel A. Friess examines in his Environmental resource management study include Urbanization and Ecology.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Mangroves give cause for conservation optimism, for now (30 citations)
- Mangroves give cause for conservation optimism, for now (30 citations)
- Global trends in mangrove forest fragmentation. (25 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Biodiversity
His primary areas of study are Mangrove, Ecosystem services, Ecosystem, Biodiversity and Blue carbon.
Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Ephemeral key and Mangrove.
Daniel A. Friess interconnects Coastal erosion, Erosion, Shore and Physical geography in the investigation of issues within Ecosystem services.
His Ecosystem study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Agroforestry.
His Biodiversity research includes elements of Urbanization, Threatened species, Agriculture and Environmental resource management.
His Blue carbon research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Soil carbon, Chronosequence and Wetland.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
