World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel A. Friess

Daniel A. Friess

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
71
Citations
19323
World Ranking
1302
National Ranking
481

Daniel A. Friess publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Friess sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 215 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Daniel A. Friess D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Friess sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel A. Friess is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a substantial focus on the subfields of Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Earth-Surface Processes, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The main topics of their scholarly work include:

  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Daniel A. Friess has contributed notably to academic literature with several recent papers. Examples include:

  • Blue carbon as a natural climate solution (2021), published in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Global trends in mangrove forest fragmentation (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Mangrove Rehabilitation and Restoration as Experimental Adaptive Management (2020), published in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • A meta-analysis of the ecological and economic outcomes of mangrove restoration (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation (2020), published in Scientific Reports

Their research is often published in a range of journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • One Earth
  • Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
  • Nature Communications
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Collaboration is evident in their work with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Catherine E. Lovelock
  • Thomas A. Worthington
  • María Fernanda Adame
  • Erik S. Yando
  • Farid Dahdouh-Guebas

Best Publications

  • Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012

    Daniel R. Richards;Daniel R. Richards;Daniel A. Friess

  • The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise

    Catherine E. Lovelock;Donald R. Cahoon;Daniel A. Friess;Glenn R. Guntenspergen

  • The future of Blue Carbon science

    Peter I. Macreadie;Andrea Anton;John A. Raven;John A. Raven;John A. Raven;Nicola Beaumont

  • Blue carbon as a natural climate solution

    Peter I. Macreadie;Micheli D. P. Costa;Trisha B. Atwood;Daniel A. Friess

  • The State of the World's Mangrove Forests: Past, Present, and Future

    Daniel A. Friess;Daniel A. Friess;Kerrylee Rogers;Catherine E. Lovelock;Ken W. Krauss

  • Impacts of climate change on mangrove ecosystems: a region by region overview

    Raymond D. Ward;Daniel A. Friess;Richard H. Day;Richard A. MacKenzie

  • World Atlas of Mangroves

    Unknown

  • Are all intertidal wetlands naturally created equal? Bottlenecks, thresholds and knowledge gaps to mangrove and saltmarsh ecosystems

    Daniel A. Friess;Ken W. Krauss;Erik M. Horstman;Erik M. Horstman;Thorsten Balke

  • Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012

    Stuart E. Hamilton;Daniel A. Friess

  • A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: Content analysis of social media photographs

    Daniel R. Richards;Daniel A. Friess

  • Mangrove blue carbon strategies for climate change mitigation are most effective at the national scale.

    Pierre Taillardat;Daniel A. Friess;Massimo Lupascu

  • Global trends in mangrove forest fragmentation.

    Dale N. Bryan-Brown;Rod M. Connolly;Daniel R. Richards;Fernanda Adame

  • Effect of land-use and land-cover change on mangrove blue carbon: A systematic review

    Sigit D. Sasmito;Sigit D. Sasmito;Pierre Taillardat;Pierre Taillardat;Jessica N. Clendenning;Jessica N. Clendenning;Clint Cameron

  • Remote sensing approaches for monitoring mangrove species, structure, and biomass: Opportunities and challenges

    Tien Dat Pham;Naoto Yokoya;Dieu Tien Bui;Kunihiko Yoshino

  • A global standard for monitoring coastal wetland vulnerability to accelerated sea-level rise

    Edward L. Webb;Daniel A. Friess;Ken W. Krauss;Donald R. Cahoon

  • Organic carbon burial and sources in soils of coastal mudflat and mangrove ecosystems

    Sigit D. Sasmito;Sigit D. Sasmito;Yakov Kuzyakov;Ali Arman Lubis;Daniel Murdiyarso;Daniel Murdiyarso

  • Urban coral reefs: Degradation and resilience of hard coral assemblages in coastal cities of East and Southeast Asia.

    Eliza C. Heery;Bert W. Hoeksema;Nicola K. Browne;Nicola K. Browne;James D. Reimer

  • Future carbon emissions from global mangrove forest loss.

    Maria F. Adame;Rod M. Connolly;Mischa P. Turschwell;Catherine E. Lovelock

  • A meta-analysis of the ecological and economic outcomes of mangrove restoration.

    Jie Su;Daniel A. Friess;Alexandros Gasparatos;Alexandros Gasparatos

  • Mangrove Rehabilitation and Restoration as Experimental Adaptive Management

    Aaron M. Ellison;Alexander J. Felson;Alexander J. Felson;Daniel A. Friess

  • Mangroves give cause for conservation optimism, for now

    Daniel A. Friess;Daniel A. Friess;Erik S. Yando;Guilherme M.O. Abuchahla;Janine B. Adams

  • Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs

    J. Phelps;D.A. Friess;E.L. Webb

  • The state of the world’s mangroves in the 21st century under climate change

    Ilka C. Feller;Daniel A. Friess;Ken W. Krauss;Roy R. Lewis

  • Deforestation in the Ayeyarwady Delta and the conservation implications of an internationally-engaged Myanmar

    Edward L. Webb;Nicholas R.A. Jachowski;Jacob Phelps;Daniel A. Friess

Frequent Co-Authors

Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
Farid Dahdouh-Guebas Université Libre de Bruxelles
Catherine E. Lovelock
Catherine E. Lovelock University of Queensland
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
Edward L. Webb
Edward L. Webb University of Helsinki
Lindsay B. Hutley
Lindsay B. Hutley Charles Darwin University
Alan D. Ziegler
Alan D. Ziegler National University of Singapore
Shing Yip Lee
Shing Yip Lee Chinese University of Hong Kong
Stefano Cannicci
Stefano Cannicci University of Hong Kong
Ken W. Krauss
Ken W. Krauss United States Geological Survey
Mark Spalding
Mark Spalding University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse fields such as research, conservation, environmental management, and education. As the demand for interdisciplinary skills grows, a number of online degrees make it easier for working professionals or career changers to upskill in related areas.

For those considering combining life sciences with health or nursing, options like online direct entry msn programs allow you to transition into nursing careers without a prior nursing degree. If you’re looking for quality, flexibility, and recognized credentials, explore programs at top rated online nursing schools wgu and similar institutions.

Many students seek efficient pathways to advanced qualifications; online bsn programs offer affordable bridge options, and their distance learning formats make them accessible worldwide. If you value accreditation and non-profit education, consider not for profit online colleges for highly regarded, flexible, and reputable study choices.

Whether you aim for a specialized career or want to broaden your academic repertoire, online degrees offer flexible, affordable pathways closely aligned with the needs of today’s evolving STEM workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel A. Friess

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles