World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6723
World Ranking
7924
National Ranking
4248

Marsha E. Bates publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marsha E. Bates sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marsha E. Bates D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marsha E. Bates sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marsha E. Bates is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, focusing primarily on Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology. Within these broad areas, more specialized subfields include Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

Their research topics emphasize Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Cardiac Health and Mental Health, and issues related to Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes.

Bates has contributed to several frequently cited publication venues, among them:

  • Addiction Biology
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Cognition & Emotion

Recent published papers include:

  • Cardiovascular mechanisms of interoceptive awareness: Effects of resonance breathing (2021), published in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Closing the brain-heart loop: Towards more holistic models of addiction and addiction recovery (2020), published in Addiction Biology
  • More than meets the heart: systolic amplification of different emotional faces is task dependent (2020), published in Cognition & Emotion
  • Interoceptive signaling in alcohol cognitive biases: Role of family history and alliesthetic components (2020), published in Addiction Biology
  • Substance Use and Addiction Affect More Than the Brain: the Promise of Neurocardiac Interventions (2021), published in Current Addiction Reports

Bates frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including:

  • Jennifer F. Buckman
  • Mateo Leganes-Fonteneau
  • Anthony P. Pawlak
  • Evgeny Vaschillo
  • J. L. Price

The scope of Bates' work integrates cardiovascular science with psychological and behavioral health studies, placing particular emphasis on the interplay between cardiac function and mental health processes. This interdisciplinary approach is reflected in both their choice of research topics and the diverse journals in which they publish.

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive impairment associated with alcohol use disorders: implications for treatment.

    Marsha E. Bates;Stephen C. Bowden;Danielle Barry

  • The d2 Test of attention: construct validity and extensions in scoring techniques.

    Marsha E. Bates;Edward P. Lemay

  • Adolescence-limited versus persistent delinquency: extending Moffitt's hypothesis into adulthood

    Helene Raskin White;Marsha E. Bates;Steven Buyske

  • A Role for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Increasing the Effectiveness of Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorders

    Marsha E. Bates;Jennifer F. Buckman;Tam T. Nguyen

  • Developmental trajectories of male physical violence and theft: relations to neurocognitive performance.

    Edward D. Barker;Jean R. Séguin;Helene Raskin White;Marsha E. Bates

  • Cognitive impairment influences drinking outcome by altering therapeutic mechanisms of change.

    Marsha E. Bates;Anthony P. Pawlak;J. Scott Tonigan;Jennifer F. Buckman

  • Adolescent risk factors and the prediction of persistent alcohol and drug use into adulthood

    Marsha E. Bates;Erich W. Labouvie

  • Age of first use: its reliability and predictive utility.

    Erich Labouvie;Marsha E. Bates;Robert J. Pandina

  • Judgment of emotion among chronic schizophrenics.

    Louis H. Muzekari;Marsha E. Bates

  • FAS and CFL Forms of Verbal Fluency Differ in Difficulty: A Meta-analytic Study

    Danielle Barry;Marsha E. Bates;Erich Labouvie

  • Short-term neuropsychological recovery in clients with substance use disorders

    Marsha E. Bates;Gerald T. Voelbel;Jennifer F. Buckman;Erich W. Labouvie

  • Heart Rate Variability Response to Alcohol, Placebo, and Emotional Picture Cue Challenges: Effects of 0.1 Hz Stimulation

    Evgeny G. Vaschillo;Marsha E. Bates;Marsha E. Bates;Bronya Vaschillo;Paul Lehrer

  • Associations Between Heavy Drinking and Changes in Impulsive Behavior Among Adolescent Boys

    Helene R. White;Naomi R. Marmorstein;Fulton T. Crews;Marsha E. Bates

  • Caudate Nucleus Volume and Cognitive Performance: Are they related in Childhood Psychopathology?

    Gerald T. Voelbel;Marsha E. Bates;Marsha E. Bates;Jennifer F. Buckman;Gahan Pandina

  • Reasons for alcohol use in young adulthood: validation of a three-dimensional measure.

    Erich Labouvie;Marsha E Bates

  • Effects of executive function impairment on change processes and substance use outcomes in 12-step treatment.

    J Morgenstern;M E Bates

  • Personality–environment constellations and alcohol use: A process-oriented study of intraindividual change during adolescence.

    Marsha E. Bates;Erich W. Labouvie

  • Finding groups using model-based cluster analysis: heterogeneous emotional self-regulatory processes and heavy alcohol use risk

    Eun Young Mun;Alexander von Eye;Marsha E. Bates;Evgeny G. Vaschillo

  • A Pilot Study of Brief Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback to Reduce Craving in Young Adult Men Receiving Inpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders

    D. Eddie;C. Kim;P. Lehrer;E. Deneke

  • The Relationship between Sensation Seeking and Delinquency: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Helene Raskin White;Erich W. Labouvie;Marsha E. Bates

Frequent Co-Authors

Erich Labouvie
Erich Labouvie Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Helene R. White
Helene R. White Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Nancy M. Petry
Nancy M. Petry University of Connecticut
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Samuel A. Ball
Samuel A. Ball Yale University
David J. Kavanagh
David J. Kavanagh Queensland University of Technology
Edward A. Selby
Edward A. Selby Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William Fals-Stewart
William Fals-Stewart Research Triangle Park Foundation
Joseph I. Tracy
Joseph I. Tracy Thomas Jefferson University
Robert L. Hendren
Robert L. Hendren University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees in the USA open doors to a range of rewarding career paths, including marriage and family therapy (MFT). Becoming an MFT typically requires a relevant master’s degree, rigorous clinical training, and state-specific certification. Requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, Scottsdale mft certification requirements specify both education and supervised experience, while Seattle mft certification requirements include licensing exams tailored to Washington State laws.

Other regions have their own processes. Students considering how to become an MFT in Spokane should be aware of practical experience mandates and required coursework distinct to the area. Likewise, the St. Louis mft certification requirements focus on specific training and state accreditation procedures for Missouri.

Before enrolling in an online psychology degree, it’s vital to research local licensing regulations, supervised internship requirements, and post-graduation steps in your intended state. By understanding these pathways, students and graduates can better plan their academic journey and professional future in the field of therapy and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Marsha E. Bates

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles