World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
10826
World Ranking
3745
National Ranking
2096

William Fals-Stewart publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Fals-Stewart sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William Fals-Stewart D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Fals-Stewart sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Fals-Stewart was affiliated with the Research Triangle Park Foundation in the United States. Their research contributions spanned key areas in mathematics and economics, econometrics, and finance with a focus on statistical methods and causal inference techniques applied to clinical trials and health system evaluations.

Their work included publishing in venues such as UNC Libraries, where they contributed to research addressing statistical power estimation in clinical trial designs. A notable publication was titled "Estimating statistical power for open-enrollment group treatment trials," released in 2020 through UNC Libraries.

Throughout their career, William Fals-Stewart collaborated frequently with other researchers. Some of their prominent co-authors included Antonio A. Morgan-López, Lissette M. Saavedra, and Denise A. Hien, each of whom worked with them on various projects contributing to clinical statistics and health economics.

The main fields of study that defined their research were:

  • Mathematics
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Within these broader fields, their subfields of focus included:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Economics and Econometrics

William Fals-Stewart's research themes covered:

  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Best Publications

  • The timeline followback reports of psychoactive substance use by drug-abusing patients: psychometric properties.

    William Fals-Stewart;Timothy J. O'Farrell;Timothy T. Freitas;Susan K. McFarlin

  • The occurrence of partner physical aggression on days of alcohol consumption: A longitudinal diary study:

    William Fals-Stewart

  • Intimate partner violence and alcohol use: Exploring the role of drinking in partner violence and its implications for intervention

    Keith C. Klostermann;William Fals-Stewart

  • Partner violence before and after couples-based alcoholism treatment for male alcoholic patients: the role of treatment involvement and abstinence.

    Timothy J. O'Farrell;Christopher M. Murphy;Sharon H. Stephan;William Fals-Stewart

  • Intimate partner violence and substance use: a longitudinal day-to-day examination.

    William Fals-Stewart;James Golden;Julie A Schumacher

  • Partner violence before and after individually based alcoholism treatment for male alcoholic patients.

    Timothy J. O'Farrell;William Fals-Stewart;Marie Murphy;Christopher M. Murphy

  • A Comparison of Behavioral Group Therapy and Individual Behavior Therapy in Treating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Unknown

  • Expressed emotion and relapse in alcoholic patients.

    Timothy J. O'Farrell;Jill Hooley;William Fals-Stewart;Henry S. G. Cutter

  • Correlates of intimate partner violence among male alcoholic patients.

    Christopher M. Murphy;Timothy J. O'Farrell;William Fals-Stewart;Michael Feehan

  • Couples- versus individual-based therapy for alcohol and drug abuse: effects on children's psychosocial functioning.

    Michelle L. Kelley;William Fals-Stewart

  • Rapid cognitive screening of patients with substance use disorders.

    Marc L. Copersino;William Fals-Stewart;Garrett Fitzmaurice;David J. Schretlen

  • Alcohol consumption and intimate partner violence by alcoholic men: Comparing violent and nonviolent conflicts

    Christopher M. Murphy;Jamie Winters;Timothy J. O'Farrell;William Fals-Stewart

  • The occurrence of male-to-female intimate partner violence on days of men's drinking: the moderating effects of antisocial personality disorder

    William Fals-Stewart;Kenneth E. Leonard;Gary R. Birchler

  • Behavioral couples therapy for drug-abusing patients: effects on partner violence.

    William Fals-Stewart;Todd B Kashdan;Timothy J O'Farrell;Timothy J O'Farrell;Gary R Birchler;Gary R Birchler

  • Parentification and family responsibility in the family of origin of adult children of alcoholics.

    Michelle L. Kelley;Alexis French;Kaitlin Bountress;Heather A. Keefe

  • Behavioral couples therapy for male substance-abusing patients : Effects on relationship adjustment and drug-using behavior

    William Fals-Stewart;Gary R. Birchler;Timothy J. O'Farrell

  • Behavioral couples therapy for female substance-abusing patients: effects on substance use and relationship adjustment.

    Jamie Winters;William Fals-Stewart;Timothy J. O'Farrell;Gary R. Birchler

  • Behavioral family counseling and naltrexone for male opioid-dependent patients.

    William Fals-Stewart;Timothy J. O'Farrell

  • Emotional and behavioral problems of children living with drug-abusing fathers: comparisons with children living with alcohol-abusing and non-substance-abusing fathers.

    William Fals-Stewart;Michelle L. Kelley;Frank D. Fincham;James Golden

  • Addressing intimate partner violence in substance-abuse treatment

    William Fals-Stewart;Cheryl Kennedy

  • Behavioral Couples Therapy for alcoholism and drug abuse: Where we've been, where we are, and where we're going

    William Fals-Stewart;Timothy J. O'Farrell;Gary R. Birchler;James Córdova

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary R. Birchler
Gary R. Birchler University of California, San Diego
Timothy J. O'Farrell
Timothy J. O'Farrell Harvard Medical School
Michelle L. Kelley
Michelle L. Kelley Old Dominion University
Christopher M. Murphy
Christopher M. Murphy University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Marsha E. Bates
Marsha E. Bates Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Kenneth E. Leonard
Kenneth E. Leonard University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Frank D. Fincham
Frank D. Fincham Florida State University
Todd B. Kashdan
Todd B. Kashdan George Mason University
Erich Labouvie
Erich Labouvie Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jill M. Hooley
Jill M. Hooley Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career possibilities. Specialized fields, such as sports psychology, are becoming increasingly popular and offer unique challenges and rewards. If you’re interested, explore this guide on how to become a sports psychologist to learn about required skills and certifications.

Not every therapy role demands a psychology major. There are several paths to becoming a therapist, including social work and counseling programs. Discover more about whether you need a psychology degree to be a therapist and alternative routes to enter this meaningful profession.

The corporate world is also a vibrant area for psychologists. Professionals interested in workplace behavior and organizational well-being may consider these steps to become an industrial organizational psychologist.

Salary and responsibilities can vary widely depending on the career you choose. For students weighing their options, don’t miss this comparison of psychologist salary vs psychiatrist to better understand the differences between the two pathways.

Best Scientists Citing William Fals-Stewart

Recently Published Articles