World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fridolin Krausmann

Fridolin Krausmann

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 80 958 910 8 8 203 26464

Fridolin Krausmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fridolin Krausmann between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fridolin Krausmann published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2016. 23 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2016. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 15 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1999 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fridolin Krausmann: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 6
2002 4
2003 6
2004 5
2005 1
2006 15
2007 10
2008 7
2009 9
2010 4
2011 11
2012 14
2013 15
2014 13
2015 12
2016 24
2017 11
2018 7
2019 9
2020 10
2021 10
2022 12
2023 13
2024 11
2025 12
Total 252
Download as CSV

Fridolin Krausmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fridolin Krausmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318 203
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Fridolin Krausmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fridolin Krausmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47 80
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Austria Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Austria Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Austria Leader Award

Overview

Fridolin Krausmann is affiliated with BOKU University in Austria and specializes in Environmental Science, contributing extensively to research on environmental impact and sustainability. Their work spans several subfields, including Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Ecology, and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics addressed in Krausmann's research involve Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Sustainable Industrial Ecology, and Land Use and Ecosystem Services.

Frequent collaborators in Krausmann's scientific endeavors include Helmut Haberl, Karl-Heinz Erb, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Sarah Matej, and Simone Gingrich. Their cooperative work has produced numerous publications in several well-regarded academic venues.

Key publication venues for Krausmann's research are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • Environmental Research Letters

Among the recent papers featuring Krausmann are:

  • "Growing stocks of buildings, infrastructures and machinery as key challenge for compliance with climate targets," 2020, Global Environmental Change
  • "Relative effects of land conversion and land-use intensity on terrestrial vertebrate diversity," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Spaceship earth's odyssey to a circular economy - a century long perspective," 2020, Resources Conservation and Recycling

Krausmann's research contributions have addressed a variety of environmental challenges, including the relations between economic development and resource use, climate targets' compatibility with growing material stocks, and the effects of land use on biodiversity.

Best Publications

  • Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems

    Helmut Haberl;K. Heinz Erb;Fridolin Krausmann;Veronika Gaube

  • Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century

    Fridolin Krausmann;Simone Gingrich;Nina Eisenmenger;Karl-Heinz Erb

  • How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005

    Willi Haas;Fridolin Krausmann;Dominik Wiedenhofer;Markus Heinz

  • Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century

    Fridolin Krausmann;Karl-Heinz Erb;Simone Gingrich;Helmut Haberl

  • Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use

    Fridolin Krausmann;Dominik Wiedenhofer;Christian Lauk;Willi Haas

  • Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting

    Marina Fischer-Kowalski;Fridolin Krausmann;Stefan Giljum;Stephan Lutter

  • Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt

    Franz Essl;Stefan Dullinger;Wolfgang Rabitsch;Philip E. Hulme

  • A socio‐metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation

    Helmut Haberl;Marina Fischer-Kowalski;Fridolin Krausmann;Joan Martinez-Alier

  • How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995

    Helmut Haberl;Karl-Heinz Erb;Fridolin Krausmann

  • Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer

    Helmut Haberl;Marina Fischer-Kowalski;Fridolin Krausmann;Helga Weisz

  • Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges

    Mathis Wackernagel;Chad Monfreda;Niels B Schulz;Karl-Heinz Erb

  • Decoupling : natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth

    Marina Fischer-Kowalski;Mark Swilling;Ernst Ulrich Von Weizsacker;Yong Ren

  • Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints

    Fridolin Krausmann;Karl-Heinz Erb;Simone Gingrich;Christian Lauk

  • The Global Sociometabolic Transition Past and Present Metabolic Profiles and Their Future Trajectories

    Fridolin Krausmann;Marina Fischer-Kowalski;Heinz Schandl;Nina Eisenmenger

  • Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence

    Heinz Schandl;Heinz Schandl;Marina Fischer-Kowalski;James West;Stefan Giljum

  • Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis

    Julia K. Steinberger;Fridolin Krausmann;Nina Eisenmenger

  • Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010

    Martin Rudbeck Jepsen;Tobias Kuemmerle;Daniel Müller;Daniel Müller;Karlheinz Erb

  • From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900-2015.

    Fridolin Krausmann;Christian Lauk;Willi Haas;Dominik Wiedenhofer

  • The global metabolic transition: Regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950-2010.

    Anke Schaffartzik;Andreas Mayer;Simone Gingrich;Nina Eisenmenger

  • Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria—Part I: driving forces of land-use change: 1950–1995

    Fridolin Krausmann;Helmut Haberl;Niels B Schulz;Karl-Heinz Erb

  • From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the Socioeconomic Dimension of Long-term Socioecological Research

    Helmut Haberl;Verena Winiwarter;Krister Andersson;Robert U. Ayres

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Haberl
Helmut Haberl BOKU University
Karl-Heinz Erb
Karl-Heinz Erb BOKU University
Simone Gingrich
Simone Gingrich BOKU University
Heinz Schandl
Heinz Schandl Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Christoph Plutzar
Christoph Plutzar BOKU University
Julia K. Steinberger
Julia K. Steinberger University of Lausanne
Alberte Bondeau
Alberte Bondeau Aix-Marseille University
Stefan Giljum
Stefan Giljum Vienna University of Economics and Business
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Joan Martinez-Alier
Joan Martinez-Alier Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related disciplines can broaden your career prospects. Many students pursue an accredited online bachelors in sociology to gain a deeper understanding of societal behaviors and their impacts on the environment. This knowledge is valuable in fields like environmental policy and community engagement.

Advancing your education with leadership-focused programs is also popular. Several options exist for online Ed D programs without dissertation, which suit professionals balancing work and study. These programs emphasize practical application, often appealing to educators and administrators aiming to integrate sustainability into curricula and organizational strategy.

For a seamless academic progression, students can explore online EdS to EdD programs. This pathway allows educators to deepen expertise and leadership skills, which can be applied in environmental education and advocacy roles.

Lastly, social work intersects with environmental concerns, especially in community health and resilience. Finding affordable options like the cheapest online DSW programs makes pursuing advanced social work degrees more accessible, enabling graduates to address social-environmental challenges effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Fridolin Krausmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles