World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7792 7191 15 12 120 8294

Luis Concha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luis Concha between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luis Concha published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2023. 37 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2023. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 18 publications
2005 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luis Concha: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 5
2009 3
2010 3
2011 1
2012 6
2013 3
2014 9
2015 8
2016 3
2017 4
2018 6
2019 7
2020 14
2021 16
2022 18
2023 24
2024 19
2025 18
Total 174
Download as CSV

Luis Concha publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis Concha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 120 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 120
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Luis Concha D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis Concha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Luis Concha is affiliated with the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico, focusing on research integrating medicine and neuroscience. Their work encompasses numerous areas within neuroimaging, cognitive neuroscience, and neurological disorders.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics primarily related to epilepsy and neuroimaging techniques. Notable papers include:

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study, 2020, published in Brain
  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study, 2020, published in Science Advances
  • Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset?, 2021, published in NeuroImage
  • Micapipe: A pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging and connectome analysis, 2022, published in NeuroImage
  • Structural network alterations in focal and generalized epilepsy assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study follow axes of epilepsy risk gene expression, 2022, published in Nature Communications

The scientist frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Boris C. Bernhardt (33 coauthored works)
  • Raúl Rodríguez-Cruces (28 coauthored works)
  • Andrea Bernasconi (24 coauthored works)
  • Neda Bernasconi (24 coauthored works)
  • Fernando Cendes (23 coauthored works)

Luis Concha's research is often published in these venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 25 publications
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, with 9 publications
  • Epileptic Disorders, with 6 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), with 6 publications
  • NeuroImage, with 5 publications

The primary fields of study involved in their work include Medicine and Neuroscience, with a concentration in several subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Neurology.

The main topics addressed within their research include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis

Best Publications

  • Mapping Anatomical Connectivity Patterns of Human Cerebral Cortex Using In Vivo Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography

    Gaolang Gong;Yong He;Luis Concha;Catherine Lebel

  • Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Christopher D Whelan;Christopher D Whelan;Andre Altmann;Juan A Botía;Neda Jahanshad

  • Diffusion Weighted Image Denoising Using Overcomplete Local PCA

    José V. Manjón;Pierrick Coupé;Luis Concha;Antonio Buades

  • Imaging brain connectivity in children with diverse reading ability

    Christian Beaulieu;Christopher Plewes;Lori Anne Paulson;Dawne Roy

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of time-dependent axonal and myelin degradation after corpus callosotomy in epilepsy patients.

    Luis Concha;Donald W. Gross;B. Matt Wheatley;Christian Beaulieu

  • Diffusion tensor tractography of the limbic system.

    Luis Concha;Donald W. Gross;Christian Beaulieu

  • Bilateral limbic diffusion abnormalities in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Luis Concha;Christian Beaulieu;Donald W. Gross

  • Cortical thickness analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy: Reproducibility and relation to outcome

    Boris C. Bernhardt;Neda Bernasconi;Luis Concha;Andrea Bernasconi

  • In Vivo Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Histopathology of the Fimbria-Fornix in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    L. Concha;D. J. Livy;C. Beaulieu;B. M. Wheatley

  • White-matter diffusion abnormalities in temporal-lobe epilepsy with and without mesial temporal sclerosis

    L Concha;C Beaulieu;D L Collins;D W Gross

  • Extratemporal White Matter Abnormalities in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Demonstrated with Diffusion Tensor Imaging

    Donald W. Gross;Luis Concha;Christian Beaulieu

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA-Epilepsy study.

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

  • Mapping limbic network organization in temporal lobe epilepsy using morphometric correlations: insights on the relation between mesiotemporal connectivity and cortical atrophy.

    Boris C. Bernhardt;Keith J. Worsley;Pierre Besson;Luis Concha

  • Network-based atrophy modeling in the common epilepsies: A worldwide ENIGMA study.

    Sara Larivière;Raúl Rodríguez-Cruces;Jessica Royer;Maria Eugenia Caligiuri

  • Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset?

    Kurt G. Schilling;François Rheault;Laurent Petit;Colin B. Hansen

  • Spatial patterns of water diffusion along white matter tracts in temporal lobe epilepsy

    Luis Concha;Hosung Kim;Andrea Bernasconi;Boris C. Bernhardt

  • Music listening engages specific cortical regions within the temporal lobes: differences between musicians and non-musicians.

    Arafat Angulo-Perkins;William Aubé;Isabelle Peretz;Fernando A. Barrios

  • A macroscopic view of microstructure: using diffusion-weighted images to infer damage, repair, and plasticity of white matter.

    L. Concha

  • Our Faces in the Dog's Brain: Functional Imaging Reveals Temporal Cortex Activation during Perception of Human Faces.

    Laura V. Cuaya;Raúl Hernández-Pérez;Luis Concha

  • Child overweight and obesity are associated with reduced executive cognitive performance and brain alterations: a magnetic resonance imaging study in Mexican children.

    C. C. C. Bauer;C. C. C. Bauer;B. Moreno;L. González-Santos;L. Concha

  • Diffusion tensor imaging tractography and reliability analysis for limbic and paralimbic white matter tracts

    Nikolai Malykhin;Luis Concha;Peter Seres;Christian Beaulieu

  • White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA Epilepsy study

    Sean N Hatton;Khoa H Huynh;Leonardo Bonilha;Eugenio Abela

Frequent Co-Authors

Boris C. Bernhardt
Boris C. Bernhardt Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Khalid Hamandi
Khalid Hamandi Cardiff University
Simon S. Keller
Simon S. Keller University of Liverpool
Terence J. O'Brien
Terence J. O'Brien Monash University
Andrea Bernasconi
Andrea Bernasconi Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Neda Bernasconi
Neda Bernasconi Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh University of Tehran
Fernando Cendes
Fernando Cendes State University of Campinas
Mark P. Richardson
Mark P. Richardson King's College London
Carrie R. McDonald
Carrie R. McDonald University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuro­science majors often seek further specialization or faster entry into the workforce. Many choose graduate study in psychology or therapy. For those interested in a clinical focus, there are psyd online programs that offer flexible paths to careers in psychology, counseling, and research. If you are considering marriage and family therapy, online mft programs accredited by reputable institutions can let you earn your qualifications from anywhere.

Undergraduates looking to complete their studies quickly may benefit from an accelerated bachelor's degree, which can help you begin your neuroscience career or related fields sooner. It’s also wise to think about future salary potential. Explore the best bachelor degrees for high-paying career options post-graduation. Online learning pathways make it easier than ever to reach your education and career goals while balancing life’s demands.

Best Scientists Citing Luis Concha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles