World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4024 3709 62 61 179 12974
Neuroscience 63 3385 3097 142 133 246 14849

Maria Cotelli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maria Cotelli between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria Cotelli published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2020. 9 of the 276 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2020. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

276 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maria Cotelli: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 0
2005 3
2006 4
2007 9
2008 5
2009 10
2010 10
2011 11
2012 11
2013 12
2014 13
2015 11
2016 20
2017 17
2018 15
2019 15
2020 30
2021 27
2022 20
2023 4
2024 6
2025 8
2026 1
Total 276
Download as CSV

Maria Cotelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Cotelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 246 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203 246
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Maria Cotelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Cotelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Maria Cotelli is affiliated with the University of Brescia in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a notable concentration in Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health. The scientist's work includes investigations into areas such as Rehabilitation and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their research topics focus on several key domains, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Maria Cotelli has contributed to multiple papers addressing neurological disorders, brain stimulation techniques, and cognitive impairment. Recent notable publications include:

  • Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study (2021), published in Brain Stimulation
  • Increasing Brain Gamma Activity Improves Episodic Memory and Restores Cholinergic Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease (2022), published in Annals of Neurology
  • Toward noninvasive brain stimulation 2.0 in Alzheimer's disease (2021), published in Ageing Research Reviews
  • Classification of Alzheimer's Disease with Respect to Physiological Aging with Innovative EEG Biomarkers in a Machine Learning Implementation (2020), published in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Effectiveness of an Innovative Cognitive Treatment and Telerehabilitation on Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study (2020), published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

The scientist often publishes in venues such as:

  • Brain Sciences
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • GeroScience

Maria Cotelli collaborates frequently with numerous researchers in related disciplines. Their top coauthors include Rosa Manenti, Paolo Maria Rossini, Francesca Miraglia, Fabrizio Vecchio, and Barbara Borroni.

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache;David H. Benninger

  • Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly

    Annamaria Cattaneo;Nadia Cattane;Samantha Galluzzi;Stefania Provasi

  • A cultural effect on brain function.

    Eraldo Paulesu;Eamon McCrory;Ferruccio Fazio;L. Menoncello

  • Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Anna Fertonani;Sandra Rosini;Maria Cotelli;Paolo Maria Rossini

  • Improved language performance in Alzheimer disease following brain stimulation

    Maria Cotelli;Marco Calabria;Rosa Manenti;Sandra Rosini

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves naming in Alzheimer disease patients at different stages of cognitive decline

    M. Cotelli;R. Manenti;S. F. Cappa;O. Zanetti

  • Executive dysfunction and avoidant personality trait in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) and in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM/DM-2).

    G Meola;V Sansone;D Perani;S Scarone

  • Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on action naming in patients with Alzheimer disease

    Maria Cotelli;Rosa Manenti;Stefano F. Cappa;Cristina Geroldi

  • Reminiscence therapy in dementia: A review

    Maria Cotelli;Rosa Manenti;Orazio Zanetti

  • Action and object naming in frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration.

    M. Cotelli;B. Borroni;R. Manenti;A. Alberici

  • Anodal tDCS during face-name associations memory training in Alzheimer's patients

    Maria Cotelli;Rosa Manenti;Michela Brambilla;Michela Petesi

  • Guillain-Barré syndrome and COVID-19: an observational multicentre study from two Italian hotspot regions

    Massimiliano Filosto;Stefano Cotti Piccinelli;Stefano Gazzina;Camillo Foresti

  • Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease is improved by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical therapy

    Rosa Manenti;Michela Brambilla;Alberto Benussi;Sandra Rosini

  • Action and object naming in Parkinson's disease without dementia.

    M. Cotelli;B. Borroni;R. Manenti;M. Zanetti

  • Association between treatment with colchicine and improved survival in a single-centre cohort of adult hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Mirko Scarsi;Silvia Piantoni;Enrico Colombo;Paolo Airó

  • The role of mitochondria in neurodegenerative diseases

    Massimiliano Filosto;Mauro Scarpelli;Maria Sofia Cotelli;Valentina Vielmi

  • Enhancing verbal episodic memory in older and young subjects after non-invasive brain stimulation

    Rosa Manenti;Michela Brambilla;Michela Petesi;Clarissa Ferrari

  • Increasing Brain Gamma Activity Improves Episodic Memory and Restores Cholinergic Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease

    Unknown

  • Reduced cerebral blood flow and impaired visual-spatial function in proximal myotonic myopathy.

    Giovanni Meola;V. Sansone;D. Perani;A. Colleluori

  • Treatment of primary progressive aphasias by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with language training.

    Maria Cotelli;Rosa Manenti;Michela Petesi;Michela Brambilla

  • Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ataxia: A double‐blind, randomized, sham‐controlled study

    Alberto Benussi;Giacomo Koch;Maria Cotelli;Alessandro Padovani

  • Noninvasive Stimulation of Prefrontal Cortex Strengthens Existing Episodic Memories and Reduces Forgetting in the Elderly

    Marco Sandrini;Marco Sandrini;Michela Brambilla;Rosa Manenti;Sandra Rosini

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosa Manenti
Rosa Manenti Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Alessandro Padovani
Alessandro Padovani University of Brescia
Barbara Borroni
Barbara Borroni University of Brescia
Orazio Zanetti
Orazio Zanetti Ordine Ospedaliero di San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Carlo Miniussi
Carlo Miniussi University of Trento
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Stefano F. Cappa
Stefano F. Cappa Istituto Universitario Di Studi Superiori Di Pavia
Paolo Maria Rossini
Paolo Maria Rossini Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Roberto Gasparotti
Roberto Gasparotti University of Brescia
Michela Balconi
Michela Balconi Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience but wish to explore related fields or flexible study options, there are several online degrees to consider. Students with an interest in mental health or social impact careers might pursue an accelerated msw program online, which provides social work training in a fast-tracked, fully online format.

For those more interested in the behavioral sciences, an accelerated psychology programs online can lay the groundwork for roles in research, behavioral analysis, or therapy, usually allowing for faster completion than traditional degrees.

If your focus is on counseling, it’s important to choose programs with high standards of accreditation. cacrep accredited schools meet rigorous criteria, helping ensure your credentials are respected in the field. You can also find a masters in counseling that is both reputable and affordable, opening doors to a variety of support, therapy, or guidance careers.

These online degree pathways can complement a neuroscience background or offer alternative routes for those committed to advancing mental health and well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Cotelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles