World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
139
Citations
72398
World Ranking
1762
National Ranking
1006

Martin C. Mihm publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin C. Mihm sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 706 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin C. Mihm D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin C. Mihm sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 139 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin C. Mihm is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of medicine, with a focus on oncology. Their work spans several subfields, including immunology, dermatology, molecular biology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The main topics of Mihm's research include CAR-T cell therapy research, immunotherapy and immune responses, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, cancer and skin lesions, cutaneous melanoma detection and management, vascular tumors and angiosarcomas, and T-cell and B-cell immunology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin C. Mihm cover a range of topics relevant to cancer and immunology. Some of these papers include:

  • Peripheral host T cells survive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and promote graft-versus-host disease, 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Stepwise-edited, human melanoma models reveal mutations' effect on tumor and microenvironment, 2022, Science
  • Molecular analysis of primary melanoma T cells identifies patients at risk for metastatic recurrence, 2020, Nature Cancer
  • Topical therapy for regression and melanoma prevention of congenital giant nevi, 2022, Cell
  • The role of skin biopsy in diagnosis and management of calciphylaxis: A retrospective analysis, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Mihm frequently publishes in venues such as Nature Cancer, Surgical and Experimental Pathology, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Science, and Cell.

Collaborations feature prominently in Mihm's work, with several frequent coauthors including Rachael A. Clark, Thomas S. Kupper, Labib R. Zakka, W. Pruessmann, and Julie Rytlewski. These collaborations underline a multidisciplinary approach consistent with the complex nature of cancer research and immunotherapy.

Best Publications

  • Final Version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification

    Charles M. Balch;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Seng Jaw Soong;John F. Thompson

  • The Histogenesis and Biologic Behavior of Primary Human Malignant Melanomas of the Skin

    Wallace H. Clark;Lynn From;Evelina A. Bernardino;Martin C. Mihm

  • Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients

    F. Stephen Hodi;Martin C. Mihm;Robert J. Soiffer;Frank G. Haluska

  • Molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies robust subtypes including one characterized by host inflammatory response

    Stefano Monti;Kerry J. Savage;Jeffery L. Kutok;Friedrich Feuerhake

  • Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force

    Jérôme Galon;Franck Pagès;Francesco M Marincola;Francesco M Marincola;Helen K Angell;Helen K Angell

  • GLUT1: A newly discovered immunohistochemical marker for juvenile hemangiomas

    Paula E. North;Milton Waner;Milton Waner;Adam Mizeracki;Adam Mizeracki;Martin C. Mihm;Martin C. Mihm

  • Loss of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Is an Epigenetic Hallmark of Melanoma

    Christine Guo Lian;Yufei Xu;Craig Ceol;Craig Ceol;Feizhen Wu

  • Vaccination with irradiated autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete human granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor generates potent antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic melanoma

    R Soiffer;T Lynch;M Mihm;K Jung

  • Immunologic and clinical effects of antibody blockade of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 in previously vaccinated cancer patients

    F. Stephen Hodi;Marcus Butler;Darryl A. Oble;Michael V. Seiden;Michael V. Seiden

  • Efficacy of an elective regional lymph node dissection of 1 to 4 mm thick melanomas for patients 60 years of age and younger.

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Alfred A. Bartolucci;Marshall M. Urist

  • Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial.

    Charles M. Balch;Marshall M. Urist;Constantine P. Karakousis;Thomas J. Smith

  • Melanoma cell-intrinsic PD-1 receptor functions promote tumor growth

    Sonja Kleffel;Christian Posch;Steven R Barthel;Hansgeorg Mueller;Hansgeorg Mueller

  • Melasma: A clinical, light microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunofluorescence study

    Nestor P. Sanchez;Madhu A. Pathak;Syozo Sato;Thomas B. Fitzpatrick

  • Differences in Dendritic Cells Stimulated in Vivo by Tumors Engineered to Secrete Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor or Flt3-Ligand

    N Mach;S Gillessen;S B Wilson;C Sheehan

  • Bevacizumab plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

    F. Stephen Hodi;Donald Lawrence;Cecilia Lezcano;Xinqi Wu

  • Tumor Lymphangiogenesis : A Novel Prognostic Indicator for Cutaneous Melanoma Metastasis and Survival

    Soheil S. Dadras;Thomas Paul;Jennifer Bertoncini;Lawrence F. Brown

  • Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional Randomized Trial Comparing Prognostic Factors and Surgical Results for Intermediate Thickness Melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm)

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Merrick I. Ross;Marshall M. Urist

  • A Unique Microvascular Phenotype Shared by Juvenile Hemangiomas and Human Placenta

    Paula E. North;Milton Waner;Adam Mizeracki;Robert E. Mrak

  • The classification of malignant melanoma and its histologic reporting

    Vincent J. McGovern;Martin C. Mihm;Christiane Bailly;Joan C. Booth

  • An ultraviolet-radiation-independent pathway to melanoma carcinogenesis in the red hair/fair skin background

    Devarati Mitra;Xi Luo;Ann Morgan;Jin Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur J. Sober
Arthur J. Sober Harvard University
George F. Murphy
George F. Murphy Brigham and Women's Hospital
Cynthia M. Magro
Cynthia M. Magro Cornell University
Thomas B. Fitzpatrick
Thomas B. Fitzpatrick Harvard University
Richard A. Scolyer
Richard A. Scolyer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Atul K. Bhan
Atul K. Bhan Harvard University
Andrzej Slominski
Andrzej Slominski University of Alabama at Birmingham
Glenn Dranoff
Glenn Dranoff Harvard Medical School
Alfred W. Kopf
Alfred W. Kopf New York University
Robert A. Lew
Robert A. Lew Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and healthcare career pathways. Many professionals seek flexible options to advance their education while balancing work. For working adults looking to move into leadership, whats the best online mha program for working adults is a key question—a top MHA program can help you climb the administrative ladder without interrupting your career.

For nurses aiming to boost qualifications, online RN to BSN programs are very popular. Some practitioners want to avoid lengthy clinical placements; if that's important to you, see this helpful list of the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements.

Nursing professionals can also consider advanced degrees. If your goal is a doctorate and speed is a factor, look at options for short dnp programs that fast-track your progress. Interested in programs that are less challenging but still reputable? Review the top choices for the easiest dnp programs.

Choosing the right online healthcare degree can accelerate your career and meet your personal needs without sacrificing professional or personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Martin C. Mihm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles