World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
5449
World Ranking
8007
National Ranking
2659

Lukas Cizek publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Cizek sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 89 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lukas Cizek D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Cizek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lukas Cizek is affiliated with Sewanee: The University of the South in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science. The subfields of study include Insect Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Plant Science.

The main topics covered in Cizek's work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Forest Insect Ecology and Management, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, Forest Management and Policy, Plant and Animal Studies, and Lichen and Fungal Ecology.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Cizek are the following papers:

  • The effect of coppicing on insect biodiversity. Small-scale mosaics of successional stages drive community turnover, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Connectivity and succession of open structures as a key to sustaining light-demanding biodiversity in deciduous forests, 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Lasting decrease in functionality and richness: Effects of ivermectin use on dung beetle communities, 2021, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Telomeric DNA sequences in beetle taxa vary with species richness, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Determinants of invasion by single versus multiple plant species in temperate lowland forests, 2022, Biological Invasions

Cizek frequently publishes in journals such as Biological Conservation, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Biogeography, Journal of Applied Ecology, and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

They have collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including Pavel Šebek, Petr Kozel, Vojtěch Lanta, Jiří Doležal, and David Hauck. These collaborations cover a wide range of studies within their main research fields.

Best Publications

  • Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest

    Vojtech Novotny;Yves Basset;Scott E. Miller;George D. Weiblen

  • Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest

    Yves Basset;Yves Basset;Yves Basset;Lukas Cizek;Lukas Cizek;Philippe Cuenoud;Raphael K. Didham

  • The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores

    Matthew L. Forister;Vojtech Novotny;Vojtech Novotny;Anna K. Panorska;Leontine Baje

  • Guild-specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest

    Vojtech Novotny;Scott E. Miller;Leontine Baje;Solomon Balagawi

  • Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management

    Stepan Vodka;Stepan Vodka;Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka;Lukas Cizek;Lukas Cizek

  • Arthropod distribution in a tropical rainforest: Tackling a four dimensional puzzle

    Yves Basset;Yves Basset;Yves Basset;Lukas Cizek;Lukas Cizek;Philippe Cuenoud;Raphael K. Didham

  • “Primeval forest relict beetles” of Central Europe: a set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants

    Andreas Eckelt;Jörg Müller;Jörg Müller;Ulrich Bense;Hervé Brustel

  • Host specialization of leaf-chewing insects in a New Guinea rainforest

    Vojtech Novotny;Yves Basset;Scott E. Miller;Pavel Drozd

  • Is Active Management the Key to the Conservation of Saproxylic Biodiversity? Pollarding Promotes the Formation of Tree Hollows

    Pavel Sebek;Pavel Sebek;Jan Altman;Jan Altman;Michal Platek;Michal Platek;Lukas Cizek;Lukas Cizek

  • Demography and Dispersal Ability of a Threatened Saproxylic Beetle: A Mark-Recapture Study of the Rosalia Longicorn (Rosalia alpina)

    Lukas Drag;David Hauck;Pavel Pokluda;Kamil Zimmermann

  • Does a minimal intervention approach threaten the biodiversity of protected areas? A multi-taxa short-term response to intervention in temperate oak-dominated forests

    Pavel Sebek;Radek Bace;Michael Bartos;Jiri Benes

  • The effects of edge-interior and understorey-canopy gradients on the distribution of saproxylic beetles in a temperate lowland forest

    Š. Vodka;L. Cizek

  • Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: Open woodlands, veteran trees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve

    Unknown

  • An altitudinal comparison of caterpillar (Lepidoptera) assemblages on Ficus trees in Papua New Guinea

    Vojtech Novotny;Scott E. Miller;Yves Basset;Lukas Cizek

  • Predictably Simple: Assemblages of Caterpillars (Lepidoptera) Feeding on Rainforest Trees in Papua New Guinea

    Vojtech Novotny;Scott E. Miller;Yves Basset;Lukas Cizek

  • Additional disturbances as a beneficial tool for restoration of post-mining sites: a multi-taxa approach

    Unknown

  • Colonising aliens: caterpillars (Lepidoptera) feeding on Piper aduncum and P. umbellatum in rainforests of Papua New Guinea

    Vojtech Novotny;Vojtech Novotny;Scott. E. Miller;Lukas Cizek;Jan Leps

  • Vertical stratification and microhabitat selection by the Great Capricorn Beetle (Cerambyx cerdo) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in open-grown, veteran oaks

    Jan Albert;Michal Platek;Lukas Cizek

  • Host plant defences and voltinism in European butterflies

    Lukas Cizek;Zdenek Fric;Martin Konvicka

  • Local species richness of leaf-chewing insects feeding on woody plants from one hectare of a lowland rainforest

    Vojtech Novotny;Yves Basset;Scott E. Miller;Roger L. Kitching

  • IBISCA-Panama, a large-scale study of arthropod beta-diversity and vertical stratification in a lowland rainforest: rationale, description of study sites and field methodology

    Yves Basset;Bruno Corbara;Hector Barrios;Philippe Cuenoud

  • Open-grown trees as key habitats for arthropods in temperate woodlands: The diversity, composition, and conservation value of associated communities

    Pavel Sebek;Stepan Vodka;Petr Bogusch;Pavel Pech

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Basset
Yves Basset Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Vojtech Novotny
Vojtech Novotny Czech Academy of Sciences
Raphael K. Didham
Raphael K. Didham University of Western Australia
Roger L. Kitching
Roger L. Kitching Griffith University
Bruno Corbara
Bruno Corbara University of Clermont Auvergne
Yves Roisin
Yves Roisin Université Libre de Bruxelles
Jérôme Orivel
Jérôme Orivel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
David W. Roubik
David W. Roubik Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Tomas Roslin
Tomas Roslin Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Alain Dejean
Alain Dejean Paul Sabatier University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a diverse range of online degree options and career transitions beyond traditional scientific fields. Many students considering roles in research or social impact may also be interested in clinical psychology master's programs online, which combine science-based reasoning with a focus on human behavior.

For those who want to drive positive change in communities through support and advocacy, a human services degree online offers a flexible path. Similarly, if you are an educator interested in diversifying your skillset, there are clear steps to transition from teaching to speech-language pathology—learn more with this resource on teacher to slp.

If you’re excited about designing sustainable spaces or integrating environmental knowledge into the built environment, online architecture programs can open additional career opportunities. Choosing a pathway that intersects with your passion for ecology can expand your impact and career potential in the long term.

Best Scientists Citing Lukas Cizek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles