World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Britta Denise Hardesty

Britta Denise Hardesty

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
15324
World Ranking
2167
National Ranking
170

Britta Denise Hardesty publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Britta Denise Hardesty sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Britta Denise Hardesty D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Britta Denise Hardesty sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Britta Denise Hardesty is affiliated with CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere in Australia and has established a significant body of research within environmental science, focusing primarily on issues related to pollution and waste management.

Hardesty's main fields of study include environmental science with a particular emphasis on pollution, industrial and manufacturing engineering, ecology, strategy and management, and global and planetary change.

Their research covers a variety of interdisciplinary topics including:

  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies

Hardesty has published extensively in several frequent publication venues such as:

  • Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent notable publications authored by or involving Hardesty include:

  • "The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Microplastic Pollution in Deep-Sea Sediments From the Great Australian Bight," 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Coastal margins and backshores represent a major sink for marine debris: insights from a continental-scale analysis," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Plastic pollution is killing marine megafauna, but how do we prioritize policies to reduce mortality?," 2020, Conservation Letters
  • "Global producer responsibility for plastic pollution," 2024, Science Advances

Hardesty has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Chris Wilcox
  • Lauren Roman
  • Kathryn Willis
  • Qamar Schuyler
  • Joanna Vince

Best Publications

  • A global inventory of small floating plastic debris

    Erik Van Sebille;Erik Van Sebille;Chris Wilcox;Laurent Lebreton;Nikolai Maximenko

  • Threat of plastic pollution to seabirds is global, pervasive, and increasing

    Chris Wilcox;Erik Van Sebille;Erik Van Sebille;Britta Denise Hardesty

  • The physical oceanography of the transport of floating marine debris

    Erik van Sebille;Stefano Aliani;Kara Lavender Law;Nikolai Maximenko

  • Millimeter-Sized Marine Plastics: A New Pelagic Habitat for Microorganisms and Invertebrates

    Julia Wiener Reisser;Jeremy Shaw;Gustaaf Hallegraeff;Maíra Carneiro Proietti

  • Marine plastic pollution in waters around Australia: Characteristics, concentrations, and pathways

    Julia Reisser;Julia Reisser;Jeremy Shaw;Chris Wilcox;Britta Denise Hardesty

  • The intermediate disturbance hypothesis and plant invasions: Implications for species richness and management

    Jane A. Catford;Curtis C. Daehler;Helen T. Murphy;Andy W. Sheppard

  • Global research priorities to mitigate plastic pollution impacts on marine wildlife

    Amanda C Vegter;Mario Barletta;Cathy A Beck;Jose Carlos Borrero

  • Global analysis of anthropogenic debris ingestion by sea turtles.

    Qamar Schuyler;Britta Denise Hardesty;Chris Wilcox;Kathy Townsend

  • Challenges and emerging solutions to the land-based plastic waste issue in Africa

    Jenna Jambeck;Britta Denise Hardesty;Amy L. Brooks;Tessa Friend

  • Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments: from local to global governance

    Joanna Vince;Britta Denise Hardesty

  • Using expert elicitation to estimate the impacts of plastic pollution on marine wildlife

    Chris Wilcox;Nicholas J. Mallos;George H. Leonard;Alba Rodriguez

  • Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments from the Great Australian Bight

    Justine Barrett;Zanna Chase;Jing Zhang;Mark M. Banaszak Holl

  • Toward the integrated marine debris observing system

    Nikolai Maximenko;Paolo Corradi;Kara Lavender Law;Erik Van Sebille

  • Using numerical model simulations to improve the understanding of micro-plastic distribution and pathways in the marine environment

    Britta D. Hardesty;Joseph Harari;Atsuhiko Isobe;Laurent Lebreton

  • Microplastic Distribution at Different Sediment Depths in an Urban Estuary

    Kathryn A. Willis;Kathryn A. Willis;Ruth Eriksen;Ruth Eriksen;Chris Wilcox;Britta D. Hardesty

  • Risk analysis reveals global hotspots for marine debris ingestion by sea turtles

    Qamar A. Schuyler;Chris Wilcox;Kathy A. Townsend;Kathryn R. Wedemeyer-Strombel

  • A quantitative analysis linking sea turtle mortality and plastic debris ingestion

    Chris Wilcox;Melody Puckridge;Qamar A Schuyler;Qamar A Schuyler;Kathy Townsend

  • How successful are waste abatement campaigns and government policies at reducing plastic waste into the marine environment

    Kathryn Willis;Kathryn Willis;Clémentine Maureaud;Chris Wilcox;Britta Denise Hardesty

  • Genetic evidence of frequent long-distance recruitment in a vertebrate-dispersed tree.

    Britta Denise Hardesty;Britta Denise Hardesty;Stephen P. Hubbell;Stephen P. Hubbell;Eldredge Bermingham

  • Estimates of fishing gear loss rates at a global scale: A literature review and meta-analysis

    Kelsey Richardson;Kelsey Richardson;Britta Denise Hardesty;Chris Wilcox

  • To Eat or Not to Eat? Debris Selectivity by Marine Turtles

    Qamar Schuyler;Brittanise Denise Hardesty;Chris Wilcox;Kathy Townsend

  • Using Expert Elicitation to Estimate the Impacts of Plastic Pollution on Marine Wildlife

    N. J. Mallos;C. Wilcox;G. H. Leonard;A. G. Rodriquez

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Wilcox
Chris Wilcox Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Erik van Sebille
Erik van Sebille Utrecht University
Stephen P. Hubbell
Stephen P. Hubbell University of California, Los Angeles
Christopher W. Dick
Christopher W. Dick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark A. Hindell
Mark A. Hindell University of Tasmania
David A. Westcott
David A. Westcott Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Nikolai Maximenko
Nikolai Maximenko University of Hawaii at Manoa
Michele Thums
Michele Thums Australian Institute of Marine Science
V. Thomas Parker
V. Thomas Parker San Francisco State University
François Galgani
François Galgani French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Ecology and Evolution grows, many students explore related online degrees to broaden their career options. Healthcare is a common alternative, offering flexible online programs for quick career advancement. For example, accelerated bsn programs allow students to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as little as six months.

Those with an associate degree in nursing can consider asn to np bridge programs, which streamline the transition to a Nurse Practitioner role. Additionally, individuals from non-nursing backgrounds often pursue direct entry msn programs for a fast-track into advanced nursing careers.

Choosing the right school is also essential. To compare program flexibility, tuition, and outcomes, many look at debates such as which school is better snhu vs wgu.

Exploring these diverse online pathways can open multiple doors to research, healthcare, and environmental leadership careers.

Best Scientists Citing Britta Denise Hardesty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles