World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
33
Citations
16586
World Ranking
2971
National Ranking
1194

Simon J. Sheather publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon J. Sheather sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 100 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Simon J. Sheather D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon J. Sheather sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Simon J. Sheather is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States and has work primarily situated within the fields of Decision Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting.

Their research covers specific subfields including Management Science and Operations Research, Accounting, and Finance. The scientist's work addresses topics such as Stock Market Forecasting Methods, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, and Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction.

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Simon J. Sheather include:

  • Predicting stock splits using ensemble machine learning and SMOTE oversampling, 2023, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
  • Predicting Stock Splits Using Ensemble Machine Learning, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Ang Li
  • Mark Liu
  • Mark H. Liu

The scientist's work has appeared mainly in the following publication venues:

  • Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Simon J. Sheather was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation

    S. J. Sheather;M. C. Jones

  • Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review.

    Heather M. McCormack;David J. de L. Horne;Simon Sheather

  • A Brief Survey of Bandwidth Selection for Density Estimation

    M. C. Jones;J. S. Marron;S. J. Sheather

  • An Effective Bandwidth Selector for Local Least Squares Regression

    D. Ruppert;S. J. Sheather;M. P. Wand

  • Robust Estimation and Testing

    Robert G. Staudte;Simon J. Sheather

  • A Modern Approach to Regression with R

    Simon J Sheather

  • Regression depth. Commentaries. Rejoinder

    P. J. Rousseeuw;M. Hubert;X. He;R. Koenker

  • Robust Estimation & Testing: Staudte/Robust

    Robert G. Staudte;Simon J. Sheather

  • On optimal data-based bandwidth selection in kernel density estimation

    Peter Hall;Simon J. Sheather;M. C. Jones;J. S. Marron

  • Kernel quantile estimators

    S. J. Sheather;J. S. Marron

  • On the Distribution of a Studentized Quantile

    Peter Hall;Simon J. Sheather

  • Using non stochastic terms to advantage in kernel-based estimation of integrated squared density derivatives

    M.C. Jones;S.J. Sheather

  • Progress in data-based bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation

    Chris Jones;J. S. Marron;S. J. Sheather

  • Variable selection in linear regression

    Charles Lindsey;Simon Sheather

  • A Cautionary Note on the Method of Least Median Squares

    Thomas P. Hettmansperger;Simon J. Sheather

  • Bayesian estimation of an autoregressive model using Markov chain Monte Carlo

    Glen Barnett;Robert Kohn;Simon Sheather

  • Density Estimation

    Unknown

  • Kernel density estimation with binned data

    David W. Scott;Simon J. Sheather

  • Confidence intervals based on interpolated order statistics

    Thomas P Hettmansperger;Thomas P Hettmansperger;Simon J Sheather

  • Small Sample Properties of Robust Analyses of Linear Models Based on R-Estimates: A Survey

    Joseph W. McKean;Simon J. Sheather

  • A nonparametric model for stochastic generation of daily rainfall occurrence

    Timothy I. Harrold;Ashish Sharma;Simon J. Sheather

  • Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics

    Robert G. Staudte;Simon J. Sheather

  • Robust Estimation and Testing

    Chulwan Kim;Robert G. Staudte;Simon J. Sheather

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas P. Hettmansperger
Thomas P. Hettmansperger Pennsylvania State University
Ashish Sharma
Ashish Sharma University of New South Wales
James Stephen Marron
James Stephen Marron University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
M. C. Jones
M. C. Jones The Open University
Jeffrey D. Hart
Jeffrey D. Hart Texas A&M University
John Roberts
John Roberts Rice University
David Ruppert
David Ruppert Cornell University
Raymond J. Carroll
Raymond J. Carroll Texas A&M University
Joanne R. Lupton
Joanne R. Lupton Texas A&M University
Robert S. Chapkin
Robert S. Chapkin Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online programs and career pathways. For those interested in advancing their leadership skills, some of the easiest mba programs offer flexible admission criteria, making it accessible to graduates from quantitative backgrounds like math.

Similarly, the easiest mba program options provide students the chance to enhance business acumen while leveraging their analytical skills. This combination often results in strong career growth in fields such as finance, operations, and data analytics.

For those aiming for executive-level positions, exploring the cheapest dba online programs can be a cost-effective way to reach Doctorate in Business Administration credentials. These programs emphasize strategic and research leadership, complementing a math background well.

Additionally, online students can consider affordable options like the cheapest online master's in finance. This pathway uniquely blends quantitative expertise with financial theory, opening up lucrative opportunities in investment banking, risk management, and financial planning.

Best Scientists Citing Simon J. Sheather

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles