World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Ecology and Evolution
Czechia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
45
Citations
6517
World Ranking
4910
National Ranking
26

Martin Konvicka publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Konvicka sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 154 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Martin Konvicka D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Konvicka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Czechia Leader Award

Overview

Martin Konvicka is affiliated with the Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic and conducts research primarily in the fields of environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans several subfields such as ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, nature and landscape conservation, ecological modeling, genetics, and general ecology.

The research topics covered by Martin Konvicka include:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Species distribution and climate change
  • Lepidoptera: biology and taxonomy
  • Forest ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Wildlife ecology and conservation
  • Forest insect ecology and management

Martin Konvicka has contributed to numerous publications in various scientific journals. Some recent papers include:

  • "Wolbachia affects mitochondrial population structure in two systems of closely related Palaearctic blue butterflies," 2021, published in Scientific Reports
  • "Restoring a butterfly hot spot by large ungulates refaunation: the case of the Milovice military training range, Czech Republic," 2021, published in BMC Ecology and Evolution
  • "Low winter precipitation, but not warm autumns and springs, threatens mountain butterflies in middle-high mountains," 2021, published in PeerJ
  • "Extremely Endangered Butterflies of Scattered Central European Dry Grasslands Under Current Habitat Alteration," 2021, published in Insect Systematics and Diversity
  • "Recently lost connectivity in the Western Palaearctic steppes: the case of a scarce specialist butterfly," 2020, published in Conservation Genetics

Their frequent co-authors include Zdeněk Faltýnek Fric, Alena Sucháčková Bartoňová, Jana Marešová, Jiří Beneš, and Pavel Vrba.

Martin Konvicka regularly publishes in key venues such as:

  • Journal of Insect Conservation
  • Research Square
  • Insects
  • Journal of Biogeography
  • Biodiversity and Conservation

The scientist's research involves a combination of empirical ecological data, conservation genetics, and species distribution analysis with an emphasis on butterflies and related insect fauna in Central Europe. Their work contributes to understanding the impacts of environmental changes and habitat alteration on species diversity and connectivity.

Best Publications

  • Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants

    Robert Tropek;Robert Tropek;Tomas Kadlec;Petra Karesova;Lukas Spitzer;Lukas Spitzer

  • Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe

    Piotr Tryjanowski;Tibor Hartel;András Báldi;Paweł Szymański

  • Uphill shifts in distribution of butterflies in the Czech Republic: effects of changing climate detected on a regional scale

    Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka;Monika Maradova;Jiri Benes;Zdenek Fric;Zdenek Fric

  • Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management

    Stepan Vodka;Stepan Vodka;Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka;Lukas Cizek;Lukas Cizek

  • Diversification of mowing regime increases arthropods diversity in species-poor cultural hay meadows

    O. Cizek;J. Zamecnik;R. Tropek;R. Tropek;P. Kocarek

  • How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold

    Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka;Jiri Benes;Oldrich Cizek;Oldrich Cizek;Frantisek Kopecek

  • Technical reclamations are wasting the conservation potential of post-mining sites. A case study of black coal spoil dumps

    Robert Tropek;Robert Tropek;Tomas Kadlec;Tomas Kadlec;Tomas Kadlec;Martin Hejda;Martin Hejda;Petr Kocarek

  • Limestone Quarries as Refuges for European Xerophilous Butterflies

    Jiří Beneš;Pavel Kepka;Martin Konvička

  • Proximity of valuable habitats affects succession patterns in abandoned quarries

    Jan Novák;Martin Konvička

  • Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities

    Lukas Spitzer;Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka;Jiri Benes;Robert Tropek

  • The significance of facultative scavenging in generalist predator nutrition: detecting decayed prey in the guts of predators using PCR.

    Pavel Foltan;Samuel Keir Sheppard;Martin Konvicka;William Oliver Christian Symondson

  • Distribution patterns in butterflies and birds of the Czech Republic: separating effects of habitat and geographical position

    David Storch;David Storch;Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka;Jiri Benes;Jana Martinková

  • Habitat use of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas maturna and forestry in Central Europe

    A. Freese;J. Benes;R. Bolz;O. Cizek;O. Cizek

  • Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: The story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic

    Jiri Benes;Oldrich Cizek;Oldrich Cizek;Jozef Dovala;Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka

  • Population Structure, Behaviour and Selection of Oviposition Sites of an Endangered Butterfly, Parnassius Mnemosyne, in Litovelské Pomoravíl. Czech Republic

    Martin Konvička;Tomáš Kuras

  • Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture?

    Martin Konvicka;Vladimir Hula;Zdenek Fric

  • Dispersal patterns of endemic alpine butterflies with contrasting population structures: Erebia epiphron and E. sudetica

    Tomas Kuras;Jiri Benes;Zdenek Fric;Martin Konvicka

  • Timed surveys and transect walks as comparable methods for monitoring butterflies in small plots

    Tomas Kadlec;Tomas Kadlec;Tomas Kadlec;Robert Tropek;Robert Tropek;Martin Konvicka;Martin Konvicka

  • Revisiting urban refuges: Changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades

    Tomas Kadlec;Jiri Benes;Vojtech Jarosik;Vojtech Jarosik;Martin Konvicka

  • Ohrožený hmyz nelesních stanovišť : ochrana a management.

    Martin Konvička;Lukáš Čížek;Jiří Beneš

  • Butterfly extinctions in European states: do socioeconomic conditions matter more than physical geography?

    Martin Konvicka;Zdenek Fric;Zdenek Fric;Jiri Benes

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Schmitt
Thomas Schmitt University of Potsdam
Niklas Wahlberg
Niklas Wahlberg Lund University
Lukas Cizek
Lukas Cizek Sewanee: The University of the South
Toomas Tammaru
Toomas Tammaru University of Tartu
Vojtěch Jarošík
Vojtěch Jarošík Charles University
David Storch
David Storch Charles University
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Tibor Hartel
Tibor Hartel Babeș-Bolyai University
Samuel K. Sheppard
Samuel K. Sheppard University of Bath
Stefan Dötterl
Stefan Dötterl University of Salzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA offers many exciting research opportunities, students interested in broader people-focused careers may also consider related fields. There is significant overlap between ecological, psychological, and human services disciplines, especially within research, outreach, and counseling settings.

Pursuing an advanced degree such as one of the child psychology masters programs can open doors to impactful careers in youth development and education. Those seeking budget-friendly training might be interested in the cheapest masters in counseling online for affordable pathways into mental health support.

For those looking to gain expertise in therapy and psychological research, explore the best online clinical psychology programs. Meanwhile, individuals interested in social impact and community work should consider human services online degree programs that offer flexible and timely routes into service careers.

Whether your interest lies in ecology, psychology, or human services, online degrees offer convenient options to launch your career and make a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Konvicka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles