World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3049 2795 218 208 137 17654

Penelope Hawe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Penelope Hawe between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Penelope Hawe published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2009. 3 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2009. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1984 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Penelope Hawe: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 3
1997 4
1998 6
1999 0
2000 5
2001 6
2002 4
2003 3
2004 8
2005 7
2006 4
2007 5
2008 5
2009 10
2010 3
2011 10
2012 4
2013 3
2014 1
2015 5
2016 2
2017 4
2018 6
2019 4
2020 7
2021 8
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
2025 1
Total 142
Download as CSV

Penelope Hawe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Penelope Hawe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 137
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Penelope Hawe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Penelope Hawe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Penelope Hawe is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Health Professions, with a particular focus on General Health Professions. Their scholarly work spans several related subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, and Epidemiology.

Their research addresses multiple main topics, notably Health Policy Implementation Science, Community Health and Development, and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology. Additional areas covered in their studies include Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Public Health Policies and Education, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, and Breastfeeding Practices and Influences.

Penelope Hawe has published in numerous academic journals, with recurring appearances in venues such as Critical Public Health, BMC Public Health, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, and Health Promotion International.

  • Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance (2021, BMJ)
  • Applying systems thinking to knowledge mobilisation in public health (2020, Health Research Policy and Systems)
  • Resources, relationships, and systems thinking should inform the way community health promotion is funded (2020, Critical Public Health)
  • Soft infrastructure: the critical community-level resources reportedly needed for program success (2022, BMC Public Health)
  • 30+ years of media analysis of relevance to chronic disease: a scoping review (2020, BMC Public Health)

Collaborative work with other researchers is a notable aspect of Penelope Hawe's profile, involving frequent partnerships with colleagues such as Victoria Loblay, Kathleen Conte, Shane Kavanagh, Alan Shiell, and Kate Garvey.

  • Victoria Loblay (8 co-authored works)
  • Kathleen Conte (6 co-authored works)
  • Shane Kavanagh (5 co-authored works)
  • Alan Shiell (5 co-authored works)
  • Kate Garvey (5 co-authored works)

Best Publications

  • Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be?

    Penelope Hawe;Alan Shiell;Therese Riley

  • Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions

    L Rychetnik;M Frommer;P Hawe;A Shiell

  • Theorising Interventions as Events in Systems

    Penelope Hawe;Alan Shiell;Therese Riley

  • The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

    Harry Rutter;Natalie Savona;Ketevan Glonti;Jo Bibby

  • Social capital and health promotion: a review.

    Penelope Hawe;Alan Shiell

  • Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation

    Alan Shiell;Penelope Hawe;Lisa Gold

  • Ecological perspectives in health research

    Lindsay McLaren;Penelope Hawe

  • Lessons from Complex Interventions to Improve Health

    Penelope Hawe

  • A simple guide to chaos and complexity

    Dean Rickles;Penelope Hawe;Alan Shiell

  • Multiplying Health Gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs

    Penelope Hawe;Michelle Noort;Lesley King;Christopher Jordens

  • Advancing the science of community-level interventions.

    Edison J. Trickett;Sarah Beehler;Charles Deutsch;Lawrence W. Green

  • A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis

    Penelope Hawe;Cynthia Webster;Alan Shiell

  • Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.

    Graham Moore;Mhairi Campbell;Lauren Copeland;Peter Craig

  • A glossary for evidence based public health

    Lucie Rychetnik;Penelope Hawe;Elizabeth Waters;Alexandra Barratt

  • What is population health intervention research

    Penelope Hawe;Louise Potvin

  • An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Ellen Annandale;Richard Ashcroft;James Barlow

  • Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial

    Penelope Hawe;Alan Shiell;Therese Riley;Lisa Gold

  • Researching practice: the methodological case for narrative inquiry

    Therese Riley;Penelope Hawe

  • Friendship networks and physical activity and sedentary behavior among youth: a systematized review.

    Keri Jo Sawka;Gavin R McCormack;Alberto Nettel-Aguirre;Penelope Hawe

  • Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT

    Rebecca Armstrong;Rebecca Armstrong;Elizabeth Waters;Elizabeth Waters;Laurence Anthony Russell Moore;Elisha Riggs

  • The Privileging of Communitarian Ideas: Citation Practices and the Translation of Social Capital Into Public Health Research

    Spencer Moore;Alan Shiell;Penelope Hawe;Valerie A. Haines

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Shiell
Alan Shiell La Trobe University
Andrew Milat
Andrew Milat New South Wales Department of Health
Elizabeth Waters
Elizabeth Waters University of Melbourne
Gavin R. McCormack
Gavin R. McCormack University of Calgary
Julie Leask
Julie Leask University of Sydney
Stephen Jan
Stephen Jan George Institute for Global Health
Laurence Moore
Laurence Moore University of Glasgow
Lesley King
Lesley King University of Sydney
Simon Chapman
Simon Chapman University of Sydney
Louise Potvin
Louise Potvin University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding online degree options and professional pathways. Students interested in mental health fields may explore accredited programs tailored to career goals and affordability.

For example, those aiming to become licensed counselors can consider cacrep schools, which provide recognized training for various counseling roles. If you are interested in working with families and couples, you might look at online mft programs accredited by respected organizations, preparing graduates for marriage and family therapy licensure.

Psychology remains a popular pathway, and there are cheap online psychology degree programs that offer a flexible, cost-effective route to both foundational and advanced studies. Likewise, students seeking to make a difference through social work may explore the easiest msw program options online, making this in-demand field more accessible.

These diverse online degrees provide opportunities for students to advance their knowledge, specialize in their passion areas, and streamline entry into meaningful careers across social and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Penelope Hawe

Trending Scientists