World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
60
Citations
23450
World Ranking
3285
National Ranking
1529

Jay M. Portnoy publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay M. Portnoy sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 312 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Jay M. Portnoy D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay M. Portnoy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay M. Portnoy is affiliated with the University of Missouri-Kansas City in the United States. Their research contributions primarily lie within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Immunology and Allergy, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Media in Health Education
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Jay M. Portnoy has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology
  • Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
  • Allergy and Asthma Proceedings

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Portnoy demonstrate a focus on allergy, telemedicine, and clinical immunology. Notable publications include:

  • "Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19," 2020, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • "Anaphylaxis-a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis," 2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • "COVID-19: Pandemic Contingency Planning for the Allergy and Immunology Clinic," 2020, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • "A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine," 2020, Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
  • "Digital Health Technology in Asthma: A Comprehensive Scoping Review," 2021, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice

Throughout their career, Portnoy has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Aarti Pandya, Marcus Shaker, Morgan Waller, Dana Wallace, and David B.K. Golden.

Best Publications

  • The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: An updated practice parameter

    Dana V. Wallace;Mark S. Dykewicz;David I. Bernstein;Joann Blessing-Moore

  • Allergen immunotherapy: A practice parameter third update

    Linda Cox;Harold Nelson;Richard Lockey;Christopher Calabria

  • Food allergy: a practice parameter update-2014.

    Hugh A. Sampson;Seema Aceves;S. Allan Bock;John James

  • Allergy diagnostic testing: An updated practice parameter

    I Leonard Bernstein;James T. Li;David I. Bernstein;Robert Hamilton

  • The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update.

    Phillip Lieberman;Richard A. Nicklas;John Oppenheimer;Stephen F. Kemp

  • The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update.

    Jonathan A. Bernstein;David M. Lang;David A. Khan;Timothy Craig

  • AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy

    Brian P Vickery;Andrea Vereda;Thomas B Casale

  • Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency

    Francisco A. Bonilla;David A. Khan;Zuhair K. Ballas;Javier Chinen

  • Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency.

    Francisco A. Bonilla;I. Leonard Bernstein;David A. Khan;Zuhair K. Ballas

  • Anaphylaxis—a 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis

    Unknown

  • Meteorological conditions, climate change, new emerging factors, and asthma and related allergic disorders. A statement of the World Allergy Organization

    Gennaro D'Amato;Stephen T Holgate;Ruby Pawankar;Dennis K Ledford

  • The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis: an updated practice parameter.

    Phillip Lieberman;Stephen F. Kemp;John Oppenheimer;David M. Lang

  • Anaphylaxis—a practice parameter update 2015

    Phillip Lieberman;Richard A. Nicklas;Christopher Randolph;John Oppenheimer

  • Atopic dermatitis: A practice parameter update 2012

    Lynda Schneider;Stephen Tilles;Peter Lio;Mark Boguniewicz

  • The medical effects of mold exposure

    Robert K. Bush;Jay M. Portnoy;Andrew Saxon;Abba I. Terr

  • The diagnosis and management of sinusitis: A practice parameter update

    Raymond G. Slavin;Sheldon L. Spector;I. Leonard Bernstein;Michael A. Kaliner

  • Recent warming by latitude associated with increased length of ragweed pollen season in central North America

    Lewis Ziska;Kim Knowlton;Christine Rogers;Dan Dalan

  • The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: world allergy organization position statement

    Tari Haahtela;Stephen Holgate;Ruby Pawankar;Cezmi A Akdis

  • COVID-19: Pandemic Contingency Planning for the Allergy and Immunology Clinic.

    Marcus S Shaker;Marcus S Shaker;John Oppenheimer;Mitchell Grayson;David Stukus

  • Stinging insect hypersensitivity: a practice parameter update.

    John E. Moffitt;David B K Golden;Robert E. Reisman;Rufus Lee

  • Adverse reactions to vaccines practice parameter 2012 update

    John M. Kelso;Matthew J. Greenhawt;James T. Li;Richard A. Nicklas

  • Stinging insect hypersensitivity: A practice parameter update 2011

    David B.K. Golden;John Moffitt;Richard A. Nicklas;Theodore Freeman

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Khan
David A. Khan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dana Wallace
Dana Wallace Nova Southeastern University
David I. Bernstein
David I. Bernstein University of Cincinnati
Sheldon L. Spector
Sheldon L. Spector University of California, Los Angeles
Charles L. Barnes
Charles L. Barnes University of Missouri
Frank B. Hu
Frank B. Hu Harvard University
James T. Li
James T. Li Mayo Clinic
Jonathan A. Bernstein
Jonathan A. Bernstein University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Matthew Greenhawt
Matthew Greenhawt University of Colorado Denver
J. David Miller
J. David Miller Carleton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in immunology, related fields like nursing and psychiatric care offer promising career options. Many students explore nurse practitioner degrees, with programs varying in difficulty. If you're curious about program accessibility, resources detailing which nurse practitioner program is easiest can guide your choice.

Online education has expanded opportunities, especially for specialized tracks like psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) programs. Finding the right program often depends on clinical placement success, an essential factor highlighted by listings of online pmhnp programs with clinical placement.

Cost is another significant consideration. Many prospective students prioritize affordability without sacrificing quality, so comparing cheapest psych np programs can help in selecting a budget-friendly option.

Finally, understanding potential earnings is crucial when planning a healthcare career. Transparency in salary data, such as the dnp salary transparency by state, provides valuable insight into expected income across different regions.

Best Scientists Citing Jay M. Portnoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles