World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7471
World Ranking
7546
National Ranking
4065

Suzanne Pingree publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne Pingree sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Suzanne Pingree D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanne Pingree sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Suzanne Pingree is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The available information does not specify particular research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or fields of study associated with this scientist.

Due to the limited data, there are no listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specified main fields and subfields of study related to Suzanne Pingree's research profile. Additionally, no information is provided on main topics of work or awards received.

Given the affiliation with a prominent research institution, it can be inferred that Suzanne Pingree is engaged in academic or scientific activities consistent with university research standards, although specific details of their contributions remain unspecified in the source data.

Best Publications

  • Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer.

    David H. Gustafson;Robert Hawkins;Suzanne Pingree;Fiona McTavish

  • Health Information, Credibility, Homophily, and Influence via the Internet: Web Sites Versus Discussion Groups

    Zuoming Wang;Joseph B. Walther;Suzanne Pingree;Robert P. Hawkins

  • Advancing communication science : merging mass and interpersonal processes

    Robert P. Hawkins;John M. Wiemann;Suzanne Pingree

  • Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: a prospective study

    Neeraj K. Arora;David H. Gustafson;Robert P. Hawkins;B S Fiona McTavish

  • Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network.

    Bret R. Shaw;Fiona McTavish;Robert Hawkins;David H. Gustafson

  • CHESS: 10 Years of Research and Development in Consumer Health Informatics for Broad Populations, Including the Underserved

    David H Gustafson;Robert P Hawkins;Eric W Boberg;Fiona McTavish

  • Interplay of Negative Emotion and Health Self-Efficacy on the Use of Health Information and Its Outcomes

    Sun Young Lee;Hyunseo Hwang;Robert P. Hawkins;Suzanne Pingree

  • UNIFORM MESSAGES AND HABITUAL VIEWING: UNNECESSARY ASSUMPTIONS IN SOCIAL REALITY EFFECTS

    Robert P. Hawkins;Suzanne Pingree

  • Internet‐Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?

    David H. Gustafson;Robert Hawkins;Fiona McTavish;Suzanne Pingree

  • Effects of insightful disclosure within computer mediated support groups on women with breast cancer.

    Bret R. Shaw;Robert Hawkins;Fiona McTavish;Suzanne Pingree

  • Barriers to information access, perceived health competence, and psychosocial health outcomes: test of a mediation model in a breast cancer sample

    Neeraj K. Arora;Pauley Johnson;David H. Gustafson;Fiona McTavish

  • Some Processes in the Cultivation Effect

    Robert P. Hawkins;Suzanne Pingree

  • Randomized clinical trial of an Internet-based versus brief office intervention for adolescent smoking cessation

    Christi A. Patten;Ivana T. Croghan;Tracy M. Meis;Paul A. Decker

  • Attributes of Interactive Online Health Information Systems

    Joseph B Walther;Suzanne Pingree;Robert P Hawkins;David B Buller

  • The use and impact of a computer-based support system for people living with AIDS and HIV infection.

    D. H. Gustafson;R. P. Hawkins;E. W. Boberg;E. Bricker

  • Interpersonal communication and rape: women acknowledge their assaults.

    R A Botta;S Pingree

  • Development, Acceptance, and Use Patterns of a Computer-Based Education and Social Support System for People Living With AIDS/HIV Infection

    Eric W. Boberg;David H. Gustafson;Robert P. Hawkins;Chien Lung Chan

  • The Value of Theory for Enhancing and Understanding e-Health Interventions

    Suzanne Pingree;Robert Hawkins;Tim Baker;Lori DuBenske

  • Expressing Positive Emotions within Online Support Groups by Women with Breast Cancer

    Jeong Yeob Han;Bret R. Shaw;Robert P. Hawkins;Suzanne Pingree

  • A Scale for Sexism

    Suzanne Pingree;Robert Parker Hawkins;Matilda Butler;William Paisley

  • Searching for Cognitive Processes in the Cultivation Effect Adult and Adolescent Samples in the United States and Australia

    Robert P. Hawkins;Suzanne Pingree;Ilya Adler

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Hawkins
Robert P. Hawkins University of Wisconsin–Madison
David H. Gustafson
David H. Gustafson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Fiona McTavish
Fiona McTavish University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bret R. Shaw
Bret R. Shaw University of Wisconsin–Madison
Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jasjit S. Ahluwalia
Jasjit S. Ahluwalia Brown University
Dhavan V. Shah
Dhavan V. Shah University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard D. Hurt
Richard D. Hurt Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling can open avenues to numerous career pathways. Students aiming for flexibility and quality can choose from diverse programs tailored to specific areas, such as clinical psychology, mental health counseling, or broader behavioral science roles. Earning a degree online allows learners to balance studies with personal commitments while accessing top faculty and robust support services.

For those interested in counseling, several programs stand out. The most valuable counseling master's programs in the South offer a rich blend of theoretical knowledge and practical experience. Students in New York may want to consider the most valuable counseling programs in New York, which are noted for strong career placement and specialized tracks.

Psychology bachelor’s programs are also accessible in various states. The online psychology programs in Alabama are recognized for affordability and comprehensive coursework. Likewise, if you are considering programs in Ohio, you can view the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Cincinnati to find the right fit.

Whether your goal is to become a licensed counselor or pursue advanced psychology roles, these online degree pathways can help you start or advance your career in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Suzanne Pingree

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles