World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hubert Hasenauer

Hubert Hasenauer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8366 8030 73 73 153 5904

Hubert Hasenauer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hubert Hasenauer between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hubert Hasenauer published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2017. 7 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2017. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 3 publications
1994 2026

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hubert Hasenauer: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 4
1998 1
1999 5
2000 8
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 8
2007 5
2008 3
2009 8
2010 8
2011 4
2012 5
2013 5
2014 8
2015 10
2016 9
2017 11
2018 8
2019 6
2020 4
2021 5
2022 6
2023 9
2024 10
2025 4
2026 3
Total 173
Download as CSV

Hubert Hasenauer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hubert Hasenauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 153
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Hubert Hasenauer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hubert Hasenauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Hubert Hasenauer is affiliated with BOKU University in Austria. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, contributing extensively to the understanding of forest ecosystems and management.

The main fields of study in which Hasenauer is active include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Their work delves into several subfields, notably:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Insect Science
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Engineering

Hasenauer's research spans a variety of specific topics, including:

  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Forest Biomass Utilization and Management

The scientist has published in several recognized venues with multiple contributions, including:

  • Forests
  • Current Forestry Reports
  • Trees Forests and People
  • Carbon Management
  • Forest Ecosystems

Among their recent papers are:

  • Growing Non-native Trees in European Forests Brings Benefits and Opportunities but Also Has Its Risks and Limits, 2020, Current Forestry Reports
  • Trafficability Prediction Using Depth-to-Water Maps: the Status of Application in Northern and Central European Forestry, 2022, Current Forestry Reports
  • The easyclimate R package: Easy access to high-resolution daily climate data for Europe, 2023, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • From Industry 5.0 to Forestry 5.0: Bridging the gap with Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, 2024, Current Forestry Reports
  • Mother trees, altruistic fungi, and the perils of plant personification, 2023, Trends in Plant Science

Frequent co-authors working with Hasenauer include:

  • Mathias Neumann
  • Charalambos Neophytou
  • Benno Eberhard
  • Christoph Pucher
  • Mathias Leiter

Best Publications

  • Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in Austria.

    Peter E Thornton;Hubert Hasenauer;Michael A White

  • Sustainable Forest Management

    Hubert Hasenauer

  • A crown ratio model for Austrian forests

    Hubert Hasenauer;Robert A. Monserud

  • Climate variability drives recent tree mortality in Europe.

    Mathias Neumann;Volker Mues;Adam Moreno;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Dimensional relationships of open-grown trees in Austria

    Hubert Hasenauer

  • Sustainable forest management : growth models for Europe

    Hubert Hasenauer

  • Forest growth response to changing climate between 1961 and 1990 in Austria

    Hubert Hasenauer;Ramakrishna R Nemani;Klemens Schadauer;Steven W Running

  • Validating daily climate interpolations over complex terrain in Austria

    Hubert Hasenauer;Katarina Merganicova;Richard Petritsch;Stephan A. Pietsch

  • BGC-model parameters for tree species growing in central European forests

    Stephan A. Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer;Peter E. Thornton

  • Comparison of carbon estimation methods for European forests

    Mathias Neumann;Adam Moreno;Volker Mues;Sanna Härkönen

  • Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal conductance in forests exposed to elevated CO2

    Jeffrey M. Warren;Jeffrey M. Warren;Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Stan D. Wullschleger;Peter E. Thornton

  • Spatial downscaling of European climate data

    Adam Moreno;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Sustainability in multi-aged stands: an analysis of long-term plenter systems

    Kevin L. O'hara;Hubert Hasenauer;Georg Kindermann

  • Growing Non-native Trees in European Forests Brings Benefits and Opportunities but Also Has Its Risks and Limits

    Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Heinrich Spiecker;Charalambos Neophytou;Frits Mohren

  • Quantifying Carbon and Nutrient Input From Litterfall in European Forests Using Field Observations and Modeling

    Mathias Neumann;Liisa Ukonmaanaho;James Johnson;Sue Benham

  • Estimating tree mortality of Norway spruce stands with neural networks

    Hubert Hasenauer;Dieter Merkl;Martin Weingartner

  • Recommendations for Standardized Documentation and Further Development of Forest Growth Simulators

    Hans Pretzsch;P. Biber;J. urský;K. Von Gadow

  • Biased predictions for tree height increment models developed from smoothed ‘data’

    Hubert Hasenauer;Robert A. Monserud

  • Reconciling satellite with ground data to estimate forest productivity at national scales

    Hubert Hasenauer;Richard Petritsch;Maosheng Zhao;Celine Boisvenue

  • Extent, distribution and origin of non-native forest tree species in Europe

    Robert Brus;Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Katharina Lapin;Giuseppe Brundu

  • Evaluating the self-initialization procedure for large-scale ecosystem models

    Stephan A. Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Modeling effects of hydrological changes on the carbon and nitrogen balance of oak in floodplains.

    Stephan A. Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer;Jiři Kučera;Jan Čermák

  • Using mechanistic modeling within forest ecosystem restoration

    Stephan A Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Assessing the impacts of climate change and nitrogen deposition on Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) growth in Austria with BIOME-BGC.

    Chris S Eastaugh;Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Hubert Hasenauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert Sterba
Hubert Sterba BOKU University
Maosheng Zhao
Maosheng Zhao Science Systems and Applications (United States)
Peter E. Thornton
Peter E. Thornton Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Steven W. Running
Steven W. Running University of Montana
Jeffrey M. Warren
Jeffrey M. Warren Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Volodymyr Trotsiuk
Volodymyr Trotsiuk Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Rasmus Astrup
Rasmus Astrup Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Gherardo Chirici
Gherardo Chirici University of Florence
Olivier Bouriaud
Olivier Bouriaud Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava
Stan D. Wullschleger
Stan D. Wullschleger Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like an online geoscience degree offer specialized knowledge of Earth's systems, essential for roles in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Similarly, expertise in geospatial technology is increasingly valuable. Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs equips students with skills in mapping and spatial analysis, supporting careers in urban planning, environmental protection, and disaster management.

For those seeking a broader public service perspective, the easiest online MPA programs provide flexible pathways into environmental policy, administration, and advocacy. These programs balance accessibility with rigorous training for leadership roles.

Not every degree path requires extensive time commitment. If you are evaluating options, reviewing resources on the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that align with your career goals and learning style, making the journey toward environmental careers more manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Hubert Hasenauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles