World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hubert Hasenauer

Hubert Hasenauer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
5904
World Ranking
8364
National Ranking
74

Hubert Hasenauer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hubert Hasenauer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Hubert Hasenauer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hubert Hasenauer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hubert Hasenauer is affiliated with BOKU University in Austria. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, contributing extensively to the understanding of forest ecosystems and management.

The main fields of study in which Hasenauer is active include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Their work delves into several subfields, notably:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Insect Science
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Engineering

Hasenauer's research spans a variety of specific topics, including:

  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Forest Biomass Utilization and Management

The scientist has published in several recognized venues with multiple contributions, including:

  • Forests
  • Current Forestry Reports
  • Trees Forests and People
  • Carbon Management
  • Forest Ecosystems

Among their recent papers are:

  • Growing Non-native Trees in European Forests Brings Benefits and Opportunities but Also Has Its Risks and Limits, 2020, Current Forestry Reports
  • Trafficability Prediction Using Depth-to-Water Maps: the Status of Application in Northern and Central European Forestry, 2022, Current Forestry Reports
  • The easyclimate R package: Easy access to high-resolution daily climate data for Europe, 2023, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • From Industry 5.0 to Forestry 5.0: Bridging the gap with Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, 2024, Current Forestry Reports
  • Mother trees, altruistic fungi, and the perils of plant personification, 2023, Trends in Plant Science

Frequent co-authors working with Hasenauer include:

  • Mathias Neumann
  • Charalambos Neophytou
  • Benno Eberhard
  • Christoph Pucher
  • Mathias Leiter

Best Publications

  • Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in Austria.

    Peter E Thornton;Hubert Hasenauer;Michael A White

  • Sustainable Forest Management

    Hubert Hasenauer

  • A crown ratio model for Austrian forests

    Hubert Hasenauer;Robert A. Monserud

  • Climate variability drives recent tree mortality in Europe.

    Mathias Neumann;Volker Mues;Adam Moreno;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Dimensional relationships of open-grown trees in Austria

    Hubert Hasenauer

  • Sustainable forest management : growth models for Europe

    Hubert Hasenauer

  • Forest growth response to changing climate between 1961 and 1990 in Austria

    Hubert Hasenauer;Ramakrishna R Nemani;Klemens Schadauer;Steven W Running

  • Validating daily climate interpolations over complex terrain in Austria

    Hubert Hasenauer;Katarina Merganicova;Richard Petritsch;Stephan A. Pietsch

  • BGC-model parameters for tree species growing in central European forests

    Stephan A. Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer;Peter E. Thornton

  • Comparison of carbon estimation methods for European forests

    Mathias Neumann;Adam Moreno;Volker Mues;Sanna Härkönen

  • Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal conductance in forests exposed to elevated CO2

    Jeffrey M. Warren;Jeffrey M. Warren;Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Stan D. Wullschleger;Peter E. Thornton

  • Spatial downscaling of European climate data

    Adam Moreno;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Sustainability in multi-aged stands: an analysis of long-term plenter systems

    Kevin L. O'hara;Hubert Hasenauer;Georg Kindermann

  • Growing Non-native Trees in European Forests Brings Benefits and Opportunities but Also Has Its Risks and Limits

    Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Heinrich Spiecker;Charalambos Neophytou;Frits Mohren

  • Quantifying Carbon and Nutrient Input From Litterfall in European Forests Using Field Observations and Modeling

    Mathias Neumann;Liisa Ukonmaanaho;James Johnson;Sue Benham

  • Estimating tree mortality of Norway spruce stands with neural networks

    Hubert Hasenauer;Dieter Merkl;Martin Weingartner

  • Recommendations for Standardized Documentation and Further Development of Forest Growth Simulators

    Hans Pretzsch;P. Biber;J. urský;K. Von Gadow

  • Biased predictions for tree height increment models developed from smoothed ‘data’

    Hubert Hasenauer;Robert A. Monserud

  • Reconciling satellite with ground data to estimate forest productivity at national scales

    Hubert Hasenauer;Richard Petritsch;Maosheng Zhao;Celine Boisvenue

  • Extent, distribution and origin of non-native forest tree species in Europe

    Robert Brus;Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Katharina Lapin;Giuseppe Brundu

  • Evaluating the self-initialization procedure for large-scale ecosystem models

    Stephan A. Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Modeling effects of hydrological changes on the carbon and nitrogen balance of oak in floodplains.

    Stephan A. Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer;Jiři Kučera;Jan Čermák

  • Using mechanistic modeling within forest ecosystem restoration

    Stephan A Pietsch;Hubert Hasenauer

  • Assessing the impacts of climate change and nitrogen deposition on Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) growth in Austria with BIOME-BGC.

    Chris S Eastaugh;Elisabeth Pötzelsberger;Hubert Hasenauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert Sterba
Hubert Sterba BOKU University
Maosheng Zhao
Maosheng Zhao Science Systems and Applications (United States)
Peter E. Thornton
Peter E. Thornton Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Steven W. Running
Steven W. Running University of Montana
Jeffrey M. Warren
Jeffrey M. Warren Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Volodymyr Trotsiuk
Volodymyr Trotsiuk Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Rasmus Astrup
Rasmus Astrup Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Gherardo Chirici
Gherardo Chirici University of Florence
Olivier Bouriaud
Olivier Bouriaud Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava
Stan D. Wullschleger
Stan D. Wullschleger Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like an online geoscience degree offer specialized knowledge of Earth's systems, essential for roles in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Similarly, expertise in geospatial technology is increasingly valuable. Pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs equips students with skills in mapping and spatial analysis, supporting careers in urban planning, environmental protection, and disaster management.

For those seeking a broader public service perspective, the easiest online MPA programs provide flexible pathways into environmental policy, administration, and advocacy. These programs balance accessibility with rigorous training for leadership roles.

Not every degree path requires extensive time commitment. If you are evaluating options, reviewing resources on the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that align with your career goals and learning style, making the journey toward environmental careers more manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Hubert Hasenauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles