World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
16670
World Ranking
6868
National Ranking
393

David A. Keen publications per year

1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 3 publications
1989 2026

362 publications in total across all disciplines

David A. Keen publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Keen sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 261 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

David A. Keen D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Keen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Keen is affiliated with the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Materials Science and Chemistry, with a significant focus on Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry as subfields. The scientist's work also touches on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Geophysics.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Magnetism in Coordination Complexes
  • High-pressure Geophysics and Materials
  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
  • Glass Properties and Applications

David A. Keen's recent publications highlight key advances in metal-organic frameworks and crystallography. Notable papers include:

  • "Halogenated Metal-Organic Framework Glasses and Liquids," 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Ionic liquid facilitated melting of the metal-organic framework ZIF-8," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Melting of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites," 2021, Nature Chemistry
  • "Mixed hierarchical local structure in a disordered metal-organic framework," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Total scattering and the pair distribution function in crystallography," 2020, Crystallography Reviews

The scientist frequently publishes in several key venues. These include:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Nature Communications
  • Chemical Science
  • Chemical Communications
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society

David A. Keen's collaboration network is notable for repeated coauthorship with several researchers, including:

  • Thomas D. Bennett
  • Adam F. Sapnik
  • Celia Castillo-Blas
  • Philip A. Chater
  • Lauren McHugh

Best Publications

  • Magnetoresistance measurements on the magnetic semiconductor Nd0.5Pb0.5MnO3

    R.M. Kusters;J. Singleton;D.A. Keen;R. McGreevy

  • A comparison of various commonly used correlation functions for describing total scattering

    David A. Keen

  • Colossal Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion in the Framework Material Ag3[Co(CN)6]

    Andrew L. Goodwin;Mark Calleja;Michael J. Conterio;Martin T. Dove

  • RMCProfile: reverse Monte Carlo for polycrystalline materials.

    Matthew G Tucker;David A Keen;Martin T Dove;Andrew L Goodwin

  • Structural modelling of glasses using reverse Monte Carlo simulation

    D. A. Keen;D. A. Keen;R. L. McGreevy

  • Melt-Quenched Glasses of Metal-Organic Frameworks.

    Thomas Douglas Bennett;Yuanzheng Yue;Yuanzheng Yue;Peng Li;Ang Qiao

  • The crystallography of correlated disorder

    David A. Keen;Andrew L. Goodwin

  • Structure and Properties of an Amorphous Metal-Organic Framework

    Thomas D. Bennett;Andrew L. Goodwin;Andrew L. Goodwin;Martin T. Dove;David A. Keen;David A. Keen

  • The missing boundary in the phase diagram of PbZr1−xTixO3

    N. Zhang;N. Zhang;H. Yokota;A. M. Glazer;A. M. Glazer;Z. Ren

  • Large negative linear compressibility of Ag3[Co(CN)6]

    Andrew L. Goodwin;David A. Keen;Matthew G. Tucker

  • Gel-based morphological design of zirconium metal-organic frameworks.

    Bart Bueken;Niels Van Velthoven;Tom Willhammar;Tom Willhammar;Timothée Stassin

  • High-pressure polymorphism of the copper(I) halides: A neutron-diffraction study to ∼10 GPa

    S. Hull;D. A. Keen

  • Liquid metal–organic frameworks

    Romain Gaillac;Pluton Pullumbi;Kevin A. Beyer;Karena W. Chapman

  • Reversible pressure-induced amorphization of a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-4)

    Thomas D. Bennett;Petra Simoncic;Petra Simoncic;Stephen A. Moggach;Fabia Gozzo

  • Pressure-induced phase transitions in AgCl, AgBr, and AgI

    S. Hull;D. A. Keen

  • Ball-milling-induced amorphization of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) for the irreversible trapping of iodine.

    Thomas D. Bennett;Paul J. Saines;David A. Keen;Jin-Chong Tan

  • Facile Mechanosynthesis of Amorphous Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks

    Thomas D. Bennett;Shuai Cao;Jin Chong Tan;David A. Keen

  • Metal-organic framework glasses with permanent accessible porosity.

    Chao Zhou;Louis Longley;Andraž Krajnc;Glen J. Smales

  • Negative thermal expansion in ZrW2O8: mechanisms, rigid unit modes, and neutron total scattering.

    Matthew G. Tucker;Matthew G. Tucker;Andrew L. Goodwin;Martin T. Dove;David A. Keen;David A. Keen

  • Nanoporous Structure and Medium-Range Order in Synthetic Amorphous Calcium Carbonate

    Andrew L. Goodwin;F. Marc Michel;Brian L. Phillips;David A. Keen;David A. Keen

  • SXD – the single-crystal diffractometer at the ISIS spallation neutron source

    David A. Keen;Matthias J. Gutmann;Chick C. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew G. Tucker
Matthew G. Tucker Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Martin T. Dove
Martin T. Dove Sichuan University
Andrew L. Goodwin
Andrew L. Goodwin University of Oxford
Thomas D. Bennett
Thomas D. Bennett University of Cambridge
Yuanzheng Yue
Yuanzheng Yue Aalborg University
William Hayes
William Hayes University of Oxford
Anthony K. Cheetham
Anthony K. Cheetham University of Cambridge
Andrey Kovalevsky
Andrey Kovalevsky Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Paul Langan
Paul Langan Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Paul A. Midgley
Paul A. Midgley University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry and its practical applications, exploring related fields such as forensic science and criminal justice can open diverse career opportunities. An online master's in forensic psychology is a valuable option for those looking to combine scientific knowledge with investigative skills, enhancing job prospects in law enforcement or legal consulting.

Understanding the financial aspects is crucial when selecting a degree path. The criminal justice degree online cost varies widely depending on the institution and program length, making it important to compare options carefully for affordable education that meets career goals.

For entry-level roles, pursuing a criminal justice associate degree online can provide foundational knowledge and practical skills, offering a pathway into careers such as law enforcement technician or forensic assistant.

Salary potential is another key factor when considering forensic science careers. According to recent data on forensic science degree salary, professionals with specialized education and training can expect competitive wages, which underscores the value of pursuing relevant degrees in this field.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Keen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles