World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
8819
World Ranking
9356
National Ranking
930

Susan Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Jones sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Susan Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan Jones is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. They have contributed extensively to the social sciences, with a particular focus on sociology and political science, health, religious studies, social psychology, and clinical psychology. Their research intersects several main topics including religion, spirituality, and psychology; religion, society, and development; biblical studies and interpretation; grief, bereavement, and mental health; theological perspectives and practices; religion and society interactions; and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Their recent scholarly output includes several papers primarily authored with Leslie J. Francis, reflecting strong collaborative relationships with other frequent co-authors such as Ursula McKenna, Nelson A. Pike, Emma Williams, and Christopher F. J. Ross.

Jones has published in multiple peer-reviewed journals, with notable venues including:

  • Rural Theology
  • HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
  • Journal of Beliefs and Values
  • Mental Health Religion & Culture
  • Religions

Recent published papers exemplify a focus on the relationship between cathedrals, religious services, and psychological health and well-being within secular societies. Noteworthy publications include:

  • Belonging through Events? Exploring the Demographic Profile, Motivations, and Experiences of Those Attending the Afternoon Carol Services on Christmas Eve at Liverpool Cathedral (2021) in Religions
  • Cathedrals as Agents of Psychological Health and Well-Being within Secular Societies: Assessing the Impact of the Holly Bough Service in Liverpool Cathedral (2020) in HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
  • The Science of Cathedral Studies: Exploring Demographic Profile, Motivational Intentions, and Perceived Impact among those Attending the Holly Bough Service in Liverpool Cathedral (2020) in Religions
  • The Holly Bough Service at Liverpool Cathedral and Psychological Type Theory: Fresh Expressions or Inherited Church? (2020) in HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
  • The Contribution of Cathedrals to Psychological Health and Well-Being: Assessing the Impact of Cathedral Carol Services (2021) in HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

Their co-authorship pattern shows a predominant collaboration with Leslie J. Francis, contributing to 15 joint publications. Other regular collaborators include Ursula McKenna with 9 shared works, along with Nelson A. Pike and Emma Williams who have co-authored multiple works as well.

Their research integrates multidisciplinary perspectives exploring how religious events and practices influence psychological well-being and social belonging. This profile indicates an active engagement with themes related to mental health, spirituality, and the social roles of religious institutions in contemporary societies.

Best Publications

  • The importance of shape in early lexical learning

    Barbara Landau;Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones

  • Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention

    Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones;Barbara Landau;Lisa Gershkoff-Stowe

  • Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism?

    Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones;Barbara Landau

  • The place of perception in children's concepts ☆

    Susan S Jones;Linda B Smith

  • English lexical collocations - A study in computational linguistics

    S. Jones;J. McH Sinclair

  • Object Properties and Knowledge in Early Lexical Learning.

    Susan S. Jones;Linda B. Smith;Barbara Landau

  • Object Shape, Object Function, and Object Name

    Barbara Landau;Linda Smith;Susan Jones

  • The development of imitation in infancy.

    Susan S. Jones

  • English Collocation Studies: The Osti Report

    Ramesh Krishnamurthy;John Sinclair;Robert Daley;Susan Jones

  • Imitation in Infancy The Development of Mimicry

    Susan S. Jones

  • Count nouns, adjectives, and perceptual properties in children's novel word interpretations.

    Linda B. Smith;Susan S. Jones;Barbara Landau

  • Imitation or Exploration? Young Infants' Matching of Adults' Oral Gestures

    Susan S. Jones

  • Syntactic context and the shape bias in children's and adults' lexical learning

    Barbara Landau;Linda B Smith;Susan Jones

  • An Audience Effect on Smile Production in 10-Month-Old Infants

    Susan Scanlon Jones;Kimberly Collins;Hye-Won Hong

  • Exploration or imitation? The effect of music on 4-week-old infants' tongue protrusions.

    Susan S. Jones

  • Conrad and Women

    Susan Jones

  • How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names

    Susan S. Jones;Linda B. Smith

  • Object perception and object naming in early development.

    Barbara Landau;Linda Smith;Linda Smith;Susan Jones;Susan Jones

  • Late talkers show no shape bias in a novel name extension task

    Susan S. Jones

  • Object name learning and object perception: a deficit in late talkers.

    Susan S. Jones;Linda B. Smith

  • Literature, Modernism, and Dance

    Susan Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda B. Smith
Linda B. Smith Indiana University
Barbara Landau
Barbara Landau Johns Hopkins University
Pat Thomson
Pat Thomson University of Nottingham
Melanie J. Newport
Melanie J. Newport Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Larissa K. Samuelson
Larissa K. Samuelson University of East Anglia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology offers a variety of online degrees that open diverse career opportunities. For those aiming to support individuals with mental health challenges, a psyd in clinical psychology focuses on advanced clinical skills and prepares graduates for licensure and practice as psychologists.

Those interested in improving workplace productivity and employee well-being may consider exploring what can you do with an industrial organizational psychology degree. This path leads to roles in human resources, organizational consulting, and talent development.

Prospective students often ask, "is being a psychologist worth it?" While the answer depends on your interests and goals, this career can be highly rewarding both personally and professionally for those passionate about helping others.

Additionally, a master's in educational psychology jobs route equips you for roles in schools, research, and policy development, helping to shape educational outcomes. Online psychology programs make each of these pathways more accessible, allowing students to balance their studies with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles