World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Materials Science
Iran
2026
Award Badge
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Iran
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 76 274 247 10 10 216 17118
Materials Science 76 3367 3250 10 10 186 15225

M.R.M. Aliha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M.R.M. Aliha between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M.R.M. Aliha published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2023. 45 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2023. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 28 publications
2004 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M.R.M. Aliha: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 5
2007 4
2008 8
2009 6
2010 2
2011 8
2012 7
2013 10
2014 7
2015 5
2016 10
2017 19
2018 11
2019 14
2020 17
2021 19
2022 30
2023 31
2024 17
2025 28
Total 261
Download as CSV

M.R.M. Aliha publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.R.M. Aliha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 216 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 216
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

M.R.M. Aliha D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.R.M. Aliha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19 76
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Materials Science in Iran Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in Iran Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Materials Science in Iran Leader Award

Overview

M.R.M. Aliha is affiliated with the Iran University of Science and Technology in Iran. Their research falls primarily within the field of engineering, with a focus on several subfields including civil and structural engineering, mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, building and construction, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The main research topics addressed by Aliha cover a range of areas in material behavior and infrastructure engineering. These include:

  • Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
  • Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Concrete Properties and Behavior

Aliha has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets for their work are:

  • Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
  • Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
  • Construction and Building Materials
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Case Studies in Construction Materials

Colleagues with whom Aliha has frequently collaborated include:

  • Hamid Reza Karimi
  • Pegah Jafari Haghighatpour
  • Naghdali Choupani
  • Tomasz Sadowski
  • Filippo Berto

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Aliha demonstrate their focus on fracture mechanics and materials under various loading conditions, as well as asphalt pavement evaluation:

  • Impact of freeze-thaw cycles on low temperature mixed mode I/II cracking properties of water saturated hot mix asphalt: An experimental study, 2020, Construction and Building Materials
  • On the comparison of two mixed-mode I + III fracture test specimens, 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Cracking Properties of Warm Mix Asphalts Containing Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement and Recycling Agents under Different Loading Modes, 2021, Construction and Building Materials
  • An extended edge-notched disc bend (ENDB) specimen for mixed-mode I+II fracture assessments, 2020, International Journal of Solids and Structures
  • Fracture loads prediction of the modified 3D-printed ABS specimens under mixed-mode I/II loading, 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Best Publications

  • 45th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium

    M. R M Aliha;M. R. Ayatollahi;D. J. Smith;Martyn J Pavier

  • Geometry and size effects on fracture trajectory in a limestone rock under mixed mode loading

    M.R.M. Aliha;M.R.M. Aliha;M.R. Ayatollahi;D.J. Smith;M.J. Pavier

  • Wide range data for crack tip parameters in two disc-type specimens under mixed mode loading

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha

  • Mixed mode brittle fracture in PMMA—An experimental study using SCB specimens

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha;M.M. Hassani

  • On the use of Brazilian disc specimen for calculating mixed mode I–II fracture toughness of rock materials

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha

  • An improved semi-circular bend specimen for investigating mixed mode brittle fracture

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha;H. Saghafi

  • Fracture toughness study for a brittle rock subjected to mixed mode I/II loading

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha

  • Analysis of a new specimen for mixed mode fracture tests on brittle materials

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha

  • Mixed mode fracture resistance of asphalt concrete mixtures

    M. Ameri;A. Mansourian;S. Pirmohammad;M.R.M. Aliha

  • Determination of mode III fracture toughness for different materials using a new designed test configuration

    M.R.M. Aliha;A. Bahmani;Sh. Akhondi

  • Cracked asphalt pavement under traffic loading – A 3D finite element analysis

    M. Ameri;A. Mansourian;M. Heidary Khavas;M.R.M. Aliha

  • Application of Cracked Triangular Specimen Subjected to Three-Point Bending for Investigating Fracture Behavior of Rock Materials

    M R M Aliha;G H R Hosseinpour;M R Ayatollahi

  • Study of characteristic specification on mixed mode fracture toughness of asphalt mixtures

    M.R.M. Aliha;H. Behbahani;H. Fazaeli;M.H. Rezaifar

  • Numerical analysis of a new mixed mode I/III fracture test specimen

    M.R.M. Aliha;A. Bahmani;Sh. Akhondi

  • A novel test specimen for investigating the mixed mode I+III fracture toughness of hot mix asphalt composites – Experimental and theoretical study

    M.R.M. Aliha;A. Bahmani;Sh. Akhondi

  • Size-dependent fracture behavior of Guiting limestone under mixed mode loading

    J. Akbardoost;M. R. Ayatollahi;M. R M Aliha;M. R M Aliha;Martyn J Pavier

  • Application of an average strain energy density criterion to obtain the mixed mode fracture load of granite rock tested with the cracked asymmetric four-point bend specimens

    Seyed Mohammad Javad Razavi;Mohammad Reza Mohammad Aliha;Filippo Berto

  • Rock fracture toughness study using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc specimen under pure modes I and II loading – A statistical approach

    M.R.M. Aliha;M.R. Ayatollahi

  • Effect of temperature and air void on mixed mode fracture toughness of modified asphalt mixtures

    M.R.M. Aliha;H. Fazaeli;S. Aghajani;F. Moghadas Nejad

  • EMTSN criterion for evaluating mixed mode I/II crack propagation in rock materials

    MM Mirsayar;A Razmi;Mrm Aliha;Filippo Berto

  • Typical Upper Bound–Lower Bound Mixed Mode Fracture Resistance Envelopes for Rock Material

    M. R. M. Aliha;M. R. Ayatollahi;J. Akbardoost

  • On determination of mode II fracture toughness using semi-circular bend specimen

    M.R. Ayatollahi;M.R.M. Aliha

Frequent Co-Authors

Majid R. Ayatollahi
Majid R. Ayatollahi Iran University of Science and Technology
Filippo Berto
Filippo Berto Sapienza University of Rome
Martyn J Pavier
Martyn J Pavier University of Bristol
A.R. Torabi
A.R. Torabi University of Tehran
Mahmood M. Shokrieh
Mahmood M. Shokrieh Iran University of Science and Technology
Emanoil Linul
Emanoil Linul Polytechnic University of Timişoara
Liviu Marsavina
Liviu Marsavina Polytechnic University of Timişoara
Michael I. Friswell
Michael I. Friswell Swansea University
Seyed Jafar Sadjadi
Seyed Jafar Sadjadi Iran University of Science and Technology
Michael R Wisnom
Michael R Wisnom University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career options. For those interested in forensic applications, understanding how to become a criminal profiler can complement engineering skills with behavioral analysis and investigative techniques. This unique combination enhances problem-solving abilities in high-stakes environments.

Counseling degrees also present valuable career pathways, especially for engineers interested in team leadership and organizational development. The overview of different types of counseling degrees can guide students in selecting a specialization that fits their interests, whether in mental health, education, or workplace counseling.

For learners seeking flexible, accessible options, easy counseling degree programs online provide convenient paths to gain critical interpersonal skills alongside technical expertise. These programs help cultivate empathy and communication, essential for collaborative engineering projects.

Additionally, accelerated tracks, such as the fastest BCBA program, allow professionals to quickly obtain credentials in applied behavior analysis. This knowledge supports roles in human factors engineering and improving user-centered designs, bridging engineering and human behavior insights effectively.

Best Scientists Citing M.R.M. Aliha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles