World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
27107
World Ranking
15046
National Ranking
7605

Jane F. Lynch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane F. Lynch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 338 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jane F. Lynch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane F. Lynch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane F. Lynch is affiliated with Creighton University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Sociology and Political Science, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's research explores various main topics, notably:

  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Jane F. Lynch has contributed to several publications, with recent papers including:

  • Lynch Syndrome-Associated Extracolonic Tumors Are Rare in Two Extended Families With the Same EPCAM Deletion, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • P-46 Developing a process to support the wellbeing of children facing the death of a parent, 2022, Poster presentations

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jane F. Lynch include:

  • Henry T. Lynch
  • Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson
  • Carrie Snyder
  • Jill Hagenkord
  • C. Richard Boland

The scientist's work has appeared in various venues, primarily:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Poster presentations

Best Publications

  • HNPCC (Lynch Syndrome): Differential Diagnosis, Molecular Genetics and Management - a Review

    Henry T Lynch;Jane F Lynch;Trudy G Shaw;Jan Lubiński

  • Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: An updated review

    Henry T. Lynch;Thomas C. Smyrk;Patrice Watson;Stephen J. Lanspa

  • BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

    Caryn Lerman;Steven Narod;Kevin Schulman;Chanita Hughes

  • Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications

    Henry T. Lynch;Patrick M Lynch;S. J. Lanspa;C. L. Snyder

  • Familial breast-ovarian cancer locus on chromosome 17q12-q23

    Steven A. Narod;Jean Feunteun;Henry T. Lynch;Patrice Watson

  • Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (lynch syndromes I and II). I. Clinical description of resource

    Henry T. Lynch;William Kimberling;William A. Albano;Jane F. Lynch

  • Familial atypical multiple mole-melanoma syndrome.

    H T Lynch;B C Frichot rd;J F Lynch

  • Downregulation of death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Aparna Raval;Stephan M. Tanner;John C. Byrd;Elizabeth B. Angerman

  • Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) a phenotypically and genotypically distinctive variant of FAP

    Henry T. Lynch;Thomas Smyrk;Thomas McGinn;Stephen Lanspa

  • Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

    Caryn Lerman;Chanita Hughes;Bruce J. Trock;Ronald E. Myers

  • Familial pancreatic cancer: a review.

    H. T. Lynch;T. Smyrk;S. E. Kern;R. H. Hruban

  • Prophylactic Surgery Decisions and Surveillance Practices One Year Following BRCA1/2 Testing

    Caryn Lerman;Chanita Hughes;Robert T. Croyle;David Main

  • Phenotypic variation in eight extended CDKN2A germline mutation familial atypical multiple mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma-prone families: the familial atypical mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma syndrome.

    Henry T. Lynch;Randall E. Brand;David Hogg;Carolyn A. Deters

  • An update of HNPCC (Lynch syndrome)

    Henry T. Lynch;Thomas Smyrk;Jane Lynch

  • Molecular Analysis of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer in the United States: High Mutation Detection Rate among Clinically Selected Families and Characterization of an American Founder Genomic Deletion of the MSH2 Gene

    Anja Wagner;Alicia Barrows;Juul Th. Wijnen;Heleen van der Klift

  • Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management

    Henry T. Lynch;Jane F. Lynch;Patrick M. Lynch;Thomas Attard;Thomas Attard

  • Overview of natural history, pathology, molecular genetics and management of HNPCC (Lynch syndrome)

    Henry T. Lynch;Thomas Smyrk;Jane F. Lynch

  • Pancreatic carcinoma and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a family study.

    H T Lynch;G J Voorhees;S J Lanspa;P S McGreevy

  • Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer - Lynch syndromes I and II

    H. T. Lynch;S. J. Lanspa;B. M. Boman;T. Smyrk

  • Historical and Natural Cancer History Facets of the Lynch Syndromes

    Henry T. Lynch;Stephen J. Lanspa;Thomas C. Smyrk;Robert J. Fitzgibbons

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry T. Lynch
Henry T. Lynch Creighton University
Patrice Watson
Patrice Watson Creighton University
Thomas C. Smyrk
Thomas C. Smyrk Mayo Clinic
Patrick M. Lynch
Patrick M. Lynch The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Steven A. Narod
Steven A. Narod University of Toronto
Albert de la Chapelle
Albert de la Chapelle The Ohio State University
Caryn Lerman
Caryn Lerman University of Southern California
Riccardo Fodde
Riccardo Fodde Erasmus MC
Dennis D. Weisenburger
Dennis D. Weisenburger University of Nebraska Medical Center
Scott E. Kern
Scott E. Kern Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of health-related careers and online education paths. For those interested in advanced pharmaceutical roles, earning an online pharmd can be a flexible and affordable option, allowing you to study while gaining professional experience.

If your interests lean toward healthcare data and systems management, a bachelor of health information management online offers strong preparation for in-demand roles overseeing patient information and regulatory compliance.

For a quicker entry into the healthcare workforce, consider enrolling in cheapest medical billing and coding online courses. These credentials can lead to rewarding administrative positions in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

Those aiming for direct patient care but seeking a more flexible, cost-effective route may find the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs ideal for advancing their nursing careers. Each of these online pathways supports diverse interests and career goals within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jane F. Lynch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles