World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
52
Citations
23793
World Ranking
3524
National Ranking
1030

Ekin D. Cubuk publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ekin D. Cubuk sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ekin D. Cubuk D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ekin D. Cubuk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ekin D. Cubuk is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a strong focus on computer science and materials science. The subfields that characterize their work include materials chemistry, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, electrical and electronic engineering, and atomic and molecular physics and optics.

The scientist's recent publications illustrate the diversity and depth of their research interests. Selected papers include:

  • FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Scaling deep learning for materials discovery (2023, Nature)
  • An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials (2023, Nature)
  • Rethinking Pre-training and Self-training (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Unveiling the predictive power of static structure in glassy systems (2020, Nature Physics)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors. The most prominent among these are Samuel S. Schoenholz, Barret Zoph, Amil Merchant, Quoc V. Le, and Simon Batzner. These collaborations have contributed to a wide range of studies, particularly in machine learning approaches applied to material sciences and computer vision.

Several venues regularly publish their work, reflecting their active engagement with the academic community in both foundational and applied research. The main publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature
  • Nature Physics
  • Microscopy and Microanalysis
  • Physical Review Letters

The main topics covered by their work reflect the intersection of machine learning and materials science as well as advanced imaging and analysis techniques. These topics include:

  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods

The scope of Ekin D. Cubuk's research positions them at the crossroads of computational methods and experimental materials research, addressing challenges in both data-driven modeling and practical material characterization. The combination of AI techniques with materials chemistry underlines a multidisciplinary approach that is evident through the diverse fields, topics, and publication outlets involved in their body of work.

Best Publications

  • SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition

    Daniel S. Park;William Chan;Yu Zhang;Chung-Cheng Chiu

  • RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search Space

    Ekin Dogus Cubuk;Barret Zoph;Jon Shlens;Quoc Le

  • AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data

    Ekin D. Cubuk;Barret Zoph;Dandelion Mane;Vijay Vasudevan

  • FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence

    Kihyuk Sohn;David Berthelot;Chun-Liang Li;Zizhao Zhang

  • FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence

    Kihyuk Sohn;David Berthelot;Chun-Liang Li;Zizhao Zhang

  • AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Data

    Ekin Dogus Cubuk;Barret Zoph;Dandelion Mane;Vijay Vasudevan

  • Scaling deep learning for materials discovery

    Unknown

  • Realistic Evaluation of Deep Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms

    Avital Oliver;Augustus Odena;Colin A. Raffel;Ekin Dogus Cubuk

  • Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentation

    Golnaz Ghiasi;Yin Cui;Aravind Srinivas;Rui Qian

  • AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertainty

    Dan Hendrycks;Norman Mu;Ekin Dogus Cubuk;Barret Zoph

  • Learning Data Augmentation Strategies for Object Detection

    Barret Zoph;Ekin D. Cubuk;Golnaz Ghiasi;Tsung-Yi Lin

  • A structural approach to relaxation in glassy liquids

    Samuel S. Schoenholz;Ekin D. Cubuk;Daniel M. Sussman;Efthimios Kaxiras

  • AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertainty

    Dan Hendrycks;Norman Mu;Ekin D. Cubuk;Barret Zoph

  • Identifying structural flow defects in disordered solids using machine-learning methods.

    E. D Cubuk;Samuel Schoenholz;Jennifer M Rieser;B. D Malone

  • ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Matching and Augmentation Anchoring

    David Berthelot;Nicholas Carlini;Ekin D. Cubuk;Alex Kurakin

  • Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12,000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials

    Austin D. Sendek;Qian Yang;Ekin D. Cubuk;Karel-Alexander N. Duerloo

  • Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12 000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials

    Austin D. Sendek;Qian Yang;Ekin D. Cubuk;Karel-Alexander N. Duerloo

  • Rethinking Pre-training and Self-training

    Barret Zoph;Golnaz Ghiasi;Tsung-Yi Lin;Yin Cui

  • Atomic layer deposition of stable lithium ion conductive interfacial layer for stable cathode cycling

    Yi Cui;Jin Xie

  • Rethinking Pre-training and Self-training

    Barret Zoph;Golnaz Ghiasi;Tsung-Yi Lin;Yin Cui

  • Unveiling the predictive power of static structure in glassy systems

    V. Bapst;T. Keck;A. Grabska-Barwińska;C. Donner

  • ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoring

    Unknown

  • Machine Learning-Assisted Discovery of Solid Li-Ion Conducting Materials

    Austin D. Sendek;Ekin D. Cubuk;Ekin D. Cubuk;Evan R. Antoniuk;Gowoon Cheon

  • Structure-property relationships from universal signatures of plasticity in disordered solids

    Ekin Dogus Cubuk;Robert Ivancic;Samuel S. Schoenholz;Samuel S. Schoenholz;Danny Strickland

  • RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space

    Ekin D. Cubuk;Barret Zoph;Jonathon Shlens;Quoc V. Le

  • A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Vision

    Dong Yin;Raphael Gontijo Lopes;Jonathon Shlens;Ekin D. Cubuk

  • ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoring

    David Berthelot;Nicholas Carlini;Ekin D. Cubuk;Alex Kurakin

  • Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noise

    Justin Gilmer;Nicolas Ford;Nicholas Carlini;Ekin D. Cubuk

Frequent Co-Authors

Barret Zoph
Barret Zoph Google (United States)
Efthimios Kaxiras
Efthimios Kaxiras Harvard University
Jonathon Shlens
Jonathon Shlens Google (United States)
Evan J. Reed
Evan J. Reed Stanford University
Tsung-Yi Lin
Tsung-Yi Lin Nvidia (United States)
Colin Raffel
Colin Raffel University of Toronto
Yi Cui
Yi Cui Stanford University
Quoc V. Le
Quoc V. Le Google (United States)
Harold S. Park
Harold S. Park Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ekin D. Cubuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles