World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7020
World Ranking
8226
National Ranking
4406

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
7424
World Ranking
8038
National Ranking
3454

Thomas W. James publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. James sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 98 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas W. James D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. James sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas W. James is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with particular contributions in the subfields of Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, and Media Technology.

The scientist's work centers on several main topics, including Cryospheric studies and observations, Landslides and related hazards, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Remote-Sensing Image Classification, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Climate change and permafrost, and Energy Load and Power Forecasting.

Thomas W. James has published research in a range of academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Remote Sensing
  • GIScience & Remote Sensing
  • Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
  • Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment

Some notable recent papers by James and collaborators include:

  • Convolutional neural networks for water segmentation using sentinel-2 red, green, blue (RGB) composites and derived spectral indices, 2021, International Journal of Remote Sensing
  • Snow detection in alpine regions with Convolutional Neural Networks: discriminating snow from cold clouds and water body, 2022, GIScience & Remote Sensing
  • Climate and environmental data contribute to the prediction of grain commodity prices using deep learning, 2023, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
  • MAPunet: High-resolution snow depth mapping through U-Net pixel-wise regression, 2025, Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment

The scientist often collaborates with a select group of co-authors. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Calogero Schillaci
  • Aldo Lipani
  • Niamh French
  • Yichen Lu
  • Zilin Wang

Best Publications

  • Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.

    Thomas W. James;Jody Culham;G. Keith Humphrey;A. David Milner

  • Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas

    Thomas W. James;G.Keith Humphrey;Joseph S. Gati;Philip Servos

  • Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams

    Thomas W James;G.Keith Humphrey;Joseph S Gati;Ravi S Menon

  • Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: Inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognition

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Thomas W. James

  • An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings.

    Frances Wilkinson;Thomas W James;Hugh R Wilson;Joseph S Gati

  • Characterization of the Affective Norms for English Words by discrete emotional categories

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Joseph A. Mikels;Thomas W. James

  • Identifying and Quantifying Multisensory Integration: A Tutorial Review

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Dipanwita Ghose;Juliane Krueger Fister;Juliane Krueger Fister;Diana K. Sarko;Diana K. Sarko

  • Neural Synergy Between Kinetic Vision and Touch

    Randolph Blake;Kenith V. Sobel;Thomas W. James

  • Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges

    Thomas W James;Doreen Kimura

  • Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings

    Karin H. James;Thomas W. James;Gael Jobard;Alan C. N. Wong

  • The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition.

    Thomas W. James;G.Keith Humphrey;Joseph S. Gati;Ravi S. Menon

  • Affective auditory stimuli: characterization of the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS) by discrete emotional categories.

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Thomas W. James

  • Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity

    Thomas W. James;Thomas W. James;Isabel Gauthier

  • Neural processing of asynchronous audiovisual speech perception.

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Nicholas A. Altieri;Sunah Kim;David B. Pisoni

  • The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination.

    Isabel Gauthier;Thomas W. James;Kim M. Curby;Michael J. Tarr

  • Auditory and action semantic features activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions.

    Thomas W. James;Isabel Gauthier

  • The neural basis of haptic object processing.

    Thomas W. James;Sunah Kim;Jerry S. Fisher

  • Superadditive BOLD activation in superior temporal sulcus with threshold non-speech objects

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Marisa L. Geoghegan;Thomas W. James

  • Discrete neural substrates underlie complementary audiovisual speech integration processes

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Ross M. VanDerKlok;David B. Pisoni;Thomas W. James

  • Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes

    Robert M. Nosofsky;Daniel R. Little;Thomas W. James

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan A. Stevenson
Ryan A. Stevenson University of Western Ontario
Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
Isabel Gauthier
Isabel Gauthier Vanderbilt University
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Joseph S. Gati
Joseph S. Gati University of Western Ontario
Dale R. Sengelaub
Dale R. Sengelaub Indiana University
Julia R. Heiman
Julia R. Heiman Indiana University
Peter R. Finn
Peter R. Finn Indiana University
Erick Janssen
Erick Janssen KU Leuven
Ellen D. Ketterson
Ellen D. Ketterson Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience, there are several accelerated online bachelor's degree options that can help you enter the field faster. These programs let you build a solid scientific foundation, often in less than four years, so you can start your career or move on to advanced studies quickly.

For those considering therapy or counseling within Neuroscience, the shortest online psyd programs and lmft online programs can streamline your path to licensure. These online pathways are designed for flexible scheduling and can fast-track your progress towards high-demand mental health roles.

If your goal is a lucrative career, it’s worth exploring 4 year degrees that pay well. Many neuroscience-related and interdisciplinary degrees fall into this category, opening doorways to research, healthcare, and biotech industries.

Remember, choosing an online program means balancing convenience, accreditation, and long-term career goals. Take time to research program reputation and graduate outcomes before you enroll.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. James

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles