D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Engineering and Technology D-index 71 Citations 28,545 223 World Ranking 446 National Ranking 191

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Internal medicine

Charles E. Metz focuses on Artificial intelligence, Receiver operating characteristic, Medical imaging, Pattern recognition and Computer vision. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Machine learning, Standard error and Nuclear medicine. His studies in Machine learning integrate themes in fields like Variety, Data collection, Radiological weapon and Radionuclide imaging.

His studies deal with areas such as Statistical hypothesis testing and Computer-aided diagnosis, Radiology as well as Receiver operating characteristic. He usually deals with Medical imaging and limits it to topics linked to Data mining and Variance components. The various areas that Charles E. Metz examines in his Pattern recognition study include Maximum likelihood, Abdominal computed tomography and Significant difference.

His most cited work include:

  • Basic principles of ROC analysis (4576 citations)
  • ROC methodology in radiologic imaging (1553 citations)
  • Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. (797 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Charles E. Metz mainly focuses on Artificial intelligence, Receiver operating characteristic, Pattern recognition, Computer vision and Mammography. He interconnects Machine learning and Nuclear medicine in the investigation of issues within Artificial intelligence. The concepts of his Receiver operating characteristic study are interwoven with issues in Receiver operating characteristic analysis, Data mining and Medical imaging.

In general Computer vision, his work in Observer and Image restoration is often linked to Biplane linking many areas of study. His Mammography research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Computer-aided diagnosis and Radiology. His work investigates the relationship between Image processing and topics such as Radiography that intersect with problems in Diagnostic accuracy.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (41.30%)
  • Receiver operating characteristic (28.26%)
  • Pattern recognition (16.52%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2012)?

  • Receiver operating characteristic (28.26%)
  • Artificial intelligence (41.30%)
  • Observer (11.30%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Receiver operating characteristic, Artificial intelligence, Observer, Computer-aided diagnosis and Statistics. His Receiver operating characteristic study combines topics in areas such as Hypersurface, Data mining and Medical imaging. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Machine learning, Decision theory, Computer vision and Pattern recognition.

In the field of Machine learning, his study on Overfitting overlaps with subjects such as Component. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Classifier, Mammography and Medical physics. His study in the field of Bayes' theorem also crosses realms of Interpretation.

Between 2002 and 2012, his most popular works were:

  • Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. (223 citations)
  • Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. (156 citations)
  • Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. (123 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Internal medicine

His primary scientific interests are in Receiver operating characteristic, Data mining, Observer, Medical imaging and Artificial intelligence. His Receiver operating characteristic study is focused on Statistics in general. The Medical imaging study combines topics in areas such as Curve fitting, Receiver operating characteristic analysis and Observer performance.

His Observer performance research includes themes of Statistical hypothesis testing, Hierarchical database model and Diagnostic accuracy. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mammography, Nuclear medicine and Pattern recognition. His Pattern recognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Radiographic image interpretation, Screening mammography, BI-RADS and Measure.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Basic principles of ROC analysis

Charles E. Metz.
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine (1978)

8196 Citations

ROC methodology in radiologic imaging

Charles E. Metz.
Investigative Radiology (1986)

2430 Citations

Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies.

Charles E. Metz.
Investigative Radiology (1989)

1267 Citations

Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data

Charles E. Metz;Benjamin A. Herman;Jong-Her Shen.
Statistics in Medicine (1998)

1163 Citations

Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Donald D. Dorfman;Kevin S. Berbaum;Charles E. Metz.
Investigative Radiology (1992)

1084 Citations

Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Yuzheng Wu;M. L. Giger;Kunio Doi;C. J. Vyborny.
Radiology (1993)

622 Citations

A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data

Charles E. Metz;Pu-Lan Wang;Helen B. Kronman.
information processing in medical imaging (1984)

517 Citations

Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis.

H P Chan;K Doi;C J Vyborny;R A Schmidt.
Investigative Radiology (1990)

513 Citations

Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets

Charles E. Metz;Benjamin A. Herman;Cheryl A. Roe.
Medical Decision Making (1998)

488 Citations

The exponential Radon transform

Oleh Tretiak;Charles Metz.
Siam Journal on Applied Mathematics (1980)

471 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Metz

Maryellen L. Giger

Maryellen L. Giger

University of Chicago

Publications: 203

Kunio Doi

Kunio Doi

University of Chicago

Publications: 135

Heang Ping Chan

Heang Ping Chan

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Publications: 89

Robert M. Nishikawa

Robert M. Nishikawa

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 75

Berkman Sahiner

Berkman Sahiner

United States Food and Drug Administration

Publications: 75

Lubomir M. Hadjiiski

Lubomir M. Hadjiiski

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Publications: 74

Bin Zheng

Bin Zheng

University of Oklahoma

Publications: 69

Heber MacMahon

Heber MacMahon

University of Chicago

Publications: 68

Benjamin M. W. Tsui

Benjamin M. W. Tsui

Johns Hopkins University

Publications: 61

Rangaraj M. Rangayyan

Rangaraj M. Rangayyan

University of Calgary

Publications: 60

Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Emory University

Publications: 60

Nico Karssemeijer

Nico Karssemeijer

Radboud University Nijmegen

Publications: 58

Xiaochuan Pan

Xiaochuan Pan

University of Chicago

Publications: 55

Mark A. Helvie

Mark A. Helvie

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Publications: 52

Harrison H. Barrett

Harrison H. Barrett

University of Arizona

Publications: 51

Nicholas Petrick

Nicholas Petrick

US Food and Drug Administration

Publications: 47

Trending Scientists

Ahmed Sameh

Ahmed Sameh

Purdue University West Lafayette

Charles Ray Johns

Charles Ray Johns

IBM (United States)

Janko Kos

Janko Kos

University of Ljubljana

Carles Cantó

Carles Cantó

Nestlé (Switzerland)

Ann Marie Pendergast

Ann Marie Pendergast

Duke University

Alain Filloux

Alain Filloux

Imperial College London

Frances Wall

Frances Wall

University of Exeter

Lars E. Borg

Lars E. Borg

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

David C. Rubin

David C. Rubin

Duke University

Kees P.J. Braun

Kees P.J. Braun

Utrecht University

Rainer K. Silbereisen

Rainer K. Silbereisen

Friedrich Schiller University Jena

Jamie L. Goldenberg

Jamie L. Goldenberg

University of South Florida

Chun Yuan

Chun Yuan

University of Washington

Rama Natarajan

Rama Natarajan

City Of Hope National Medical Center

Johannes A. Langendijk

Johannes A. Langendijk

University Medical Center Groningen

Melanie Walker

Melanie Walker

University of the Free State

Something went wrong. Please try again later.