World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
18364
World Ranking
9543
National Ranking
2681

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
61
Citations
18772
World Ranking
2001
National Ranking
639

Deborah J. Myers publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah J. Myers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 327 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Deborah J. Myers D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah J. Myers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah J. Myers is affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the areas of engineering and energy, with significant contributions in subfields such as electrical and electronic engineering, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, materials chemistry, energy engineering and power technology, and electrochemistry.

The main topics covered by their work include electrocatalysts for energy conversion, fuel cells and related materials, advanced battery technologies research, hybrid renewable energy systems, machine learning in materials science, electrochemical analysis and applications, and catalytic processes in materials science.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation, 2021, Nature Energy
  • Performance enhancement and degradation mechanism identification of a single-atom Co-N-C catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, 2020, Nature Catalysis
  • Chemical vapour deposition of Fe-N-C oxygen reduction catalysts with full utilization of dense Fe-N4 sites, 2021, Nature Materials
  • Atomically dispersed iron sites with a nitrogen-carbon coating as highly active and durable oxygen reduction catalysts for fuel cells, 2022, Nature Energy
  • Recent developments in catalyst-related PEM fuel cell durability, 2020, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • David A. Cullen
  • Nancy N. Kariuki
  • Jae Hyung Park
  • Haoran Yu
  • K.C. Neyerlin

Deborah J. Myers has published extensively across several venues, with a strong presence in:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts (95 publications)
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society (12 publications)
  • Journal of Power Sources (8 publications)
  • Microscopy and Microanalysis (4 publications)
  • Nature Catalysis (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation.

    Rodney Borup;Jeremy Meyers;Bryan Pivovar;Yu Seung Kim

  • New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation

    David A. Cullen;K. C. Neyerlin;Rajesh K. Ahluwalia;Rangachary Mukundan

  • Atomically dispersed iron sites with a nitrogen–carbon coating as highly active and durable oxygen reduction catalysts for fuel cells

    Unknown

  • Highly active atomically dispersed CoN 4 fuel cell cathode catalysts derived from surfactant-assisted MOFs: carbon-shell confinement strategy

    Yanghua He;Sooyeon Hwang;David A. Cullen;M. Aman Uddin

  • Activity–Stability Trends for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Monometallic Oxides in Acidic Environments

    Nemanja Danilovic;Ramachandran Subbaraman;Kee-Chul Chang;Seo Hyoung Chang

  • Performance enhancement and degradation mechanism identification of a single-atom Co–N–C catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

    Xiaohong Xie;Cheng He;Boyang Li;Yanghua He

  • Chemical vapour deposition of Fe-N-C oxygen reduction catalysts with full utilization of dense Fe-N4 sites.

    Li Jiao;Jingkun Li;Lynne LaRochelle Richard;Qiang Sun

  • Synthesis–structure–performance correlation for polyaniline–Me–C non-precious metal cathode catalysts for oxygen reduction in fuel cells

    Gang Wu;Christina M. Johnston;Nathan H. Mack;Kateryna Artyushkova

  • Effect of voltage on platinum dissolution : Relevance to polymer electrolyte fuel cells

    Xiaoping Wang;Romesh Kumar;Deborah J. Myers

  • Multitechnique Characterization of a Polyaniline–Iron–Carbon Oxygen Reduction Catalyst

    Magali Ferrandon;A. Jeremy Kropf;Deborah J. Myers;Kateryna Artyushkova

  • Using Surface Segregation To Design Stable Ru‐Ir Oxides for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Environments

    Nemanja Danilovic;Ramachandran Subbaraman;Kee Chul Chang;Seo Hyoung Chang

  • Recent developments in catalyst-related PEM fuel cell durability

    Rodney L. Borup;Ahmet Kusoglu;Kenneth C. Neyerlin;Rangachary Mukundan

  • Tuning the thermal activation atmosphere breaks the activity–stability trade-off of Fe–N–C oxygen reduction fuel cell catalysts

    Unknown

  • Atomically dispersed single iron sites for promoting Pt and Pt3Co fuel cell catalysts: performance and durability improvements

    Zhi Qiao;Chenyu Wang;Chenzhao Li;Yachao Zeng

  • Evidence for lithium superoxide-like species in the discharge product of a Li–O2 battery

    Junbing Yang;Dengyun Zhai;Hsien Hau Wang;Kah Chun Lau

  • Evolution Pathway from Iron Compounds to Fe1(II)-N4 Sites through Gas-Phase Iron during Pyrolysis.

    Jingkun Li;Li Jiao;Evan Wegener;Lynne Larochelle Richard

  • A carbon-nanotube-supported graphene-rich non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalyst with enhanced performance durability

    Gang Wu;Karren L. More;Ping Xu;Hsing-Lin Wang

  • Regulating Catalytic Properties and Thermal Stability of Pt and PtCo Intermetallic Fuel-Cell Catalysts via Strong Coupling Effects between Single-Metal Site-Rich Carbon and Pt.

    Unknown

  • Performance Durability of Polyaniline-derived Non-precious Cathode Catalysts

    Gang Wu;Kateryna Artyushkova;Magali Ferrandon;Arthur Jeremy Kropf

  • Stability and Dissolution of Platinum Surfaces in Perchloric Acid

    V. Komanicky;K. C. Chang;A. Menzel;N. M. Markovic

  • Dynamically Unveiling Metal-Nitrogen Coordination during Thermal Activation to Design High-Efficient Atomically Dispersed CoN 4 Active Sites.

    Yanghua He;Qiurong Shi;Weitao Shan;Xing Li

  • Stability of iron species in heat-treated polyaniline–iron–carbon polymer electrolyte fuel cell cathode catalysts

    Magali Ferrandon;Xiaoping Wang;A. Jeremy Kropf;Deborah J. Myers

  • Cyanamide-derived non-precious metal catalyst for oxygen reduction

    Hoon T. Chung;Christina M. Johnston;Kateryna Artyushkova;Magali Ferrandon

  • Colloidal Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon-Supported Pd−Cu Nanoparticle Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts

    Nancy N. Kariuki;Xiaoping Wang;Jennifer R. Mawdsley;Magali S. Ferrandon

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth C. Neyerlin
Kenneth C. Neyerlin National Renewable Energy Laboratory
David A. Cullen
David A. Cullen Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Piotr Zelenay
Piotr Zelenay Los Alamos National Laboratory
Rajesh K. Ahluwalia
Rajesh K. Ahluwalia Argonne National Laboratory
Magali Ferrandon
Magali Ferrandon Argonne National Laboratory
Karren L. More
Karren L. More Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Xiaoping Wang
Xiaoping Wang Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Paulo J Ferreira
Paulo J Ferreira Instituto Superior Técnico
Rangachary Mukundan
Rangachary Mukundan Los Alamos National Laboratory
Gang Wu
Gang Wu Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities. Many students combine core technical skills with knowledge in business, management, or administration to enhance their employability. Online education enables convenient access to such interdisciplinary programs, allowing you to balance studies with work or other commitments.

For those interested in financial management, consider enrolling in the best online bookkeeping certificate programs to build a strong foundation in accounting practices. Additionally, a degree in office administration equips students with practical skills for managing office environments—valuable in any tech-driven workplace.

To further strengthen your leadership and strategic abilities, pursuing an online administration degree or an organizational management degree online can set you apart in roles that bridge engineering and business. By complementing your technical expertise with these career-focused online programs, you position yourself for long-term success across diverse sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah J. Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles