World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 47 11071 10696 2604 2419 167 9086

Kenneth C. Neyerlin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth C. Neyerlin between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth C. Neyerlin published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 7 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth C. Neyerlin: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 6
2007 2
2008 3
2009 4
2010 11
2011 6
2012 8
2013 6
2014 6
2015 2
2016 11
2017 6
2018 10
2019 26
2020 17
2021 17
2022 18
2023 13
2024 10
2025 6
2026 1
Total 190
Download as CSV

Kenneth C. Neyerlin publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth C. Neyerlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–169 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 167 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723
150–169 835 167
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth C. Neyerlin D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth C. Neyerlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612 47
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kenneth C. Neyerlin is affiliated with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of engineering and energy, with a focus on electrical and electronic engineering as well as renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment. Additional subfields of interest include electrochemistry, materials chemistry, and catalysis.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Electrocatalysts for energy conversion
  • Fuel cells and related materials
  • Advanced battery technologies research
  • CO2 reduction techniques and catalysts
  • Electrochemical analysis and applications
  • Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Conducting polymers and applications

Some of the recent papers from Kenneth C. Neyerlin include the following:

  • "New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation," published in 2021 in Nature Energy
  • "Recent developments in catalyst-related PEM fuel cell durability," published in 2020 in Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
  • "A Robust, Scalable Platform for the Electrochemical Conversion of CO2 to Formate: Identifying Pathways to Higher Energy Efficiencies," published in 2020 in ACS Energy Letters
  • "Status and challenges for the application of platinum group metal-free catalysts in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells," published in 2020 in Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
  • "Standardized protocols for evaluating platinum group metal-free oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts in polymer electrolyte fuel cells," published in 2022 in Nature Catalysis

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated most with Kenneth C. Neyerlin include:

  • Deborah J. Myers
  • Leiming Hu
  • David A. Cullen
  • Scott A Mauger
  • Tim Van Cleve

The scientist's work has been published in a range of venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • Journal of Power Sources
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society
  • ACS Energy Letters
  • Nano Energy

Best Publications

  • New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation

    David A. Cullen;K. C. Neyerlin;Rajesh K. Ahluwalia;Rangachary Mukundan

  • Enhancement of Pt and Pt-alloy fuel cell catalyst activity and durability via nitrogen-modified carbon supports

    Yingke Zhou;Yingke Zhou;Kenneth Neyerlin;Tim S. Olson;Svitlana Pylypenko;Svitlana Pylypenko

  • Measurement of Oxygen Transport Resistance in PEM Fuel Cells by Limiting Current Methods

    Daniel R. Baker;David A. Caulk;Kenneth C. Neyerlin;Michael W. Murphy

  • Study of the Exchange Current Density for the Hydrogen Oxidation and Evolution Reactions

    K. C. Neyerlin;K. C. Neyerlin;Wenbin Gu;Jacob Jorne;Hubert A. Gasteiger

  • Determination of Catalyst Unique Parameters for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in a PEMFC

    K. C. Neyerlin;K. C. Neyerlin;Wenbin Gu;Jacob Jorne;Hubert A. Gasteiger

  • Recent developments in catalyst-related PEM fuel cell durability

    Rodney L. Borup;Ahmet Kusoglu;Kenneth C. Neyerlin;Rangachary Mukundan

  • Cathode Catalyst Utilization for the ORR in a PEMFC Analytical Model and Experimental Validation

    K. C. Neyerlin;K. C. Neyerlin;Wenbin Gu;Jacob Jorne;Alfred Clark

  • Electrochemical activity and stability of dealloyed Pt–Cu and Pt–Cu–Co electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR)

    K.C. Neyerlin;Ratndeep Srivastava;Chengfei Yu;Peter Strasser;Peter Strasser

  • Effect of Relative Humidity on Oxygen Reduction Kinetics in a PEMFC

    K. C. Neyerlin;K. C. Neyerlin;Hubert A. Gasteiger;Cortney K. Mittelsteadt;Jacob Jorne

  • Activity and Durability of Iridium Nanoparticles in the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

    Shaun M. Alia;Brian Rasimick;Chilan Ngo;K. C. Neyerlin

  • Bimetallic Ru Electrocatalysts for the OER and Electrolytic Water Splitting in Acidic Media

    Rhys Forgie;Greg Bugosh;K. C. Neyerlin;Zengcai Liu

  • Impact of Catalyst Ink Dispersing Methodology on Fuel Cell Performance Using in-Situ X-ray Scattering

    Min Wang;Jae Hyung Park;Sadia Kabir;K. C. Neyerlin

  • A Robust, Scalable Platform for the Electrochemical Conversion of CO2 to Formate: Identifying Pathways to Higher Energy Efficiencies

    Yingying Chen;Ashlee Vise;W. Ellis Klein;Firat C. Cetinbas

  • ElectroCat: DOE's approach to PGM-free catalyst and electrode R&D

    Simon T. Thompson;Adria R. Wilson;Piotr Zelenay;Deborah J. Myers

  • The Use of Limiting Current to Determine Transport Resistance in PEM Fuel Cells

    Daniel R. Baker;Christian Wieser;Kenneth C. Neyerlin;Michael W. Murphy

  • Rheological Investigation on the Microstructure of Fuel Cell Catalyst Inks

    Sunilkumar Khandavalli;Jae Hyung Park;Nancy N. Kariuki;Deborah J. Myers

  • Elucidating the Dynamic Nature of Fuel Cell Electrodes as a Function of Conditioning: An ex Situ Material Characterization and in Situ Electrochemical Diagnostic Study.

    Sadia Kabir;Deborah J. Myers;Nancy N. Kariuki;Jae Park

  • Standardized protocols for evaluating platinum group metal-free oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts in polymer electrolyte fuel cells

    Unknown

  • Dictating Pt-Based Electrocatalyst Performance in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells, from Formulation to Application.

    Tim Van Cleve;Sunilkumar Khandavalli;Anamika Chowdhury;Anamika Chowdhury;Samantha Medina

  • Combinatorial Study of High Surface-Area Binary and Ternary Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

    K. C. Neyerlin;Greg Bugosh;Rhys Forgie;Zengcai Liu

  • Platinum Coated Nickel Nanowires As Oxygen Reducing Electrocatalysts

    Shaun M Alia;Brian A Larsen;Svitlana Pylypenko;David A Cullen

  • Tuning Carbon-Based Fuel Cell Catalyst Support Structures via Nitrogen Functionalization. I. Investigation of Structural and Compositional Modification of Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite Model Catalyst Supports as a Function of Nitrogen Implantation Dose

    Svitlana Pylypenko;Svitlana Pylypenko;Aimee Queen;Tim S. Olson;Arrelaine Dameron

Frequent Co-Authors

Svitlana Pylypenko
Svitlana Pylypenko Colorado School of Mines
Bryan S. Pivovar
Bryan S. Pivovar National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Deborah J. Myers
Deborah J. Myers Argonne National Laboratory
Karren L. More
Karren L. More Oak Ridge National Laboratory
David A. Cullen
David A. Cullen Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Rajesh K. Ahluwalia
Rajesh K. Ahluwalia Argonne National Laboratory
Peter Strasser
Peter Strasser Technical University of Berlin
Wilson A. Smith
Wilson A. Smith University of Colorado Boulder
Rangachary Mukundan
Rangachary Mukundan Los Alamos National Laboratory
Ryan O'Hayre
Ryan O'Hayre Colorado School of Mines

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth C. Neyerlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles