World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
55
Citations
10026
World Ranking
2054
National Ranking
366

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
9405
World Ranking
4895
National Ranking
293

Charles Oppenheim publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 369 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charles Oppenheim D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles Oppenheim is affiliated with Robert Gordon University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields including Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems and Management, and Law.

The scientific work encompasses a range of topics such as:

  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Scientometrics and Bibliometrics Research
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence

Several key papers involving Charles Oppenheim illustrate the breadth of their research. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Does education in library and information studies in the United Kingdom have a future?" (2020) in Education for Information
  • "Korea's national approach to Open Science: Present and possible future" (2022) in Journal of Information Science
  • "The Uptake of Open Science: Mapping the Results of a Systematic Literature Review" (2020) in ITM Web of Conferences
  • "A copyright overview" (2020) in El Profesional de la Informacion
  • "Identifying key factors and actions: Initial steps in the Open Science Policy Design and Implementation Process" (2023) in Journal of Information Science

Charles Oppenheim has collaborated frequently with several colleagues, including:

  • Naomi Korn
  • Adrienne Muir
  • Hanna Shmagun
  • Jae-Soo Kim
  • Jangsup Shim

Publication venues where their work is regularly featured include:

  • Information law
  • Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
  • Journal of Information Science
  • Education for Information
  • ITM Web of Conferences

In addition to journal articles, Charles Oppenheim has published books, including one titled Information Law (2020), published by Facet eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature

    Michael Norris;Charles Oppenheim

  • The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access☆

    Stevan Harnad;Tim Brody;François Vallières;Les Carr

  • The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update

    Stevan Harnad;Tim Brody;François Vallières;Les Carr

  • The citation advantage of open-access articles

    Michael Norris;Charles Oppenheim;Fytton Rowland

  • Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited

    Charles Oppenheim;Susan P. Renn

  • Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models Exploring the costs and benefits

    John Houghton;Bruce Rasmussen;Peter Sheehan;Charles Oppenheim

  • The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind

    Unknown

  • Do citations matter

    Laura M. Baird;Charles Oppenheim

  • A GENRE ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC ABSTRACTS

    Cate Cross;Charles Oppenheim

  • The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology

    Charles Oppenheim

  • The evaluation of WWW search engines

    Charles Oppenheim;Anne Morris;Cliff McKnight;S. Lowley

  • Using the h‐index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship

    Charles Oppenheim

  • National Information Policy developments worldwide I: electronic government

    Adrienne Muir;Charles Oppenheim

  • RoMEO Studies 1 : the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving

    Elizabeth Gadd;Charles Oppenheim;Steve G. Probets

  • Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories

    Claire Creaser;Jenny Fry;Helen Greenwood;Charles Oppenheim

  • THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CITATION COUNTS AND THE 1992 RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISE RATINGS FOR BRITISH LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS

    Charles Oppenheim

  • Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE

    Michael Norris;Charles Oppenheim

  • What Is the Hybrid Library

    Charles Oppenheim;Daniel Smithson

  • The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator

    Michael Norris;Charles Oppenheim

  • Mandated online RAE CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives

    Stevan Harnad;Les Carr;Tim Brody;Charles Oppenheim

  • RoMEO Studies 4: An analysis of Journal publishers' Copyright Agreements

    Elizabeth Gadd;Charles Oppenheim;Steve G. Probets

  • Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models : exploring the costs and benefits. JISC EI-ASPM Project. A report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)

    John Houghton;Bruce Rasmussen;Peter Sheehan;Charles Oppenheim

Frequent Co-Authors

Stevan Harnad
Stevan Harnad University of Quebec at Montreal
Mike Thelwall
Mike Thelwall University of Sheffield
Yves Gingras
Yves Gingras University of Quebec at Montreal
Klaus Hellgardt
Klaus Hellgardt Imperial College London
Peter Willett
Peter Willett University of Sheffield
Mark Sanderson
Mark Sanderson RMIT University
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford
David I. Stuart
David I. Stuart University of Oxford
Yorick Wilks
Yorick Wilks Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Tim Berners-Lee
Tim Berners-Lee University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens various career avenues, many of which now offer flexible, accredited online degree options. Students interested in clinical or counseling psychology can consider cheapest psyd programs, which provide a cost-effective route to a Doctor of Psychology credential and potential licensure.

Those aiming for a specialized counseling career, such as working with families or couples, may benefit from enrolling in mft online programs—some of which offer accelerated tracks. If you are looking to advance your knowledge of psychology without committing to a doctoral track, an online master degree in psychology can offer both affordability and flexibility.

For those focused on leadership, education, or organizational change, there are edd online programs that provide fast-track doctoral options. These varied pathways ensure that students can align their academic pursuits with personal interests and career goals—while managing costs and schedules with online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Oppenheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles