World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark J. Haykowsky

Mark J. Haykowsky

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 18026 16945 758 715 423 22925

Mark J. Haykowsky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark J. Haykowsky between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark J. Haykowsky published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 15.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2025. 48 of the 533 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2025. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 46 publications 2026: 2 publications
1993 2026

533 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark J. Haykowsky: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 4
1995 4
1996 1
1997 0
1998 4
1999 5
2000 4
2001 3
2002 5
2003 12
2004 16
2005 10
2006 17
2007 25
2008 9
2009 17
2010 13
2011 25
2012 19
2013 19
2014 16
2015 25
2016 30
2017 28
2018 39
2019 23
2020 10
2021 17
2022 17
2023 29
2024 37
2025 46
2026 2
Total 533
Download as CSV

Mark J. Haykowsky publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Haykowsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 423 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 423
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark J. Haykowsky D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Haykowsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark J. Haykowsky is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has an extensive publication record in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research spans several interrelated disciplines including physiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, oncology, and complementary and alternative medicine.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics in cardiovascular and exercise physiology, cardiovascular function and risk factors, chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation, cardiovascular effects of exercise, heart failure treatment and management, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, and cancer survivorship and care.

  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cancer survivorship and care

Frequent publication venues for Mark J. Haykowsky's work include:

  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal

Selected recent papers demonstrate a focus on exercise interventions and cardiovascular health outcomes. Notable publications are:

  • Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training, Moderate Continuous Training, or Guideline-Based Physical Activity Advice on Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2021, JAMA
  • Exercise Intolerance in Older Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Exercise for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Exercise for the Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Functional Disability and Cardiac Dysfunction: The BREXIT Study, 2022, Circulation
  • High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial, 2023, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark J. Haykowsky include Stephen Foulkes, André La Gerche, Richard B. Thompson, Edith Pituskin, and Amy A. Kirkham. These collaborations reflect a multidisciplinary approach to cardiovascular research and patient management.

Best Publications

  • Effect of Caloric Restriction or Aerobic Exercise Training on Peak Oxygen Consumption and Quality of Life in Obese Older Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Dalane W. Kitzman;Peter Brubaker;Timothy Morgan;Mark Haykowsky

  • Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function.

    C.K. Willie;F.L. Colino;D.M. Bailey;Y.C. Tzeng

  • A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed.

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Yuanyuan Liang;David Pechter;Lee W. Jones

  • Early Breast Cancer Therapy and Cardiovascular Injury

    Lee W. Jones;Mark J. Haykowsky;Jonas J. Swartz;Pamela S. Douglas

  • Cardiopulmonary Function and Age-Related Decline Across the Breast Cancer Survivorship Continuum

    Lee W. Jones;Kerry S. Courneya;John R. Mackey;Hyman B. Muss

  • Determinants of Exercise Intolerance in Elderly Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Peter H. Brubaker;Jerry M. John;Kathryn P. Stewart

  • Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease.

    Darren E.R. Warburton;Darren E.R. Warburton;Donald C. McKenzie;Mark J. Haykowsky;Arlana Taylor;Arlana Taylor

  • Effect of Endurance Exercise Training on Endothelial function and Arterial Stiffness in Older Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial

    Dalane W. Kitzman;Peter H. Brubaker;David M. Herrington;Timothy M. Morgan

  • Multidisciplinary Approach to Novel Therapies in Cardio-Oncology Research (MANTICORE 101–Breast): A Randomized Trial for the Prevention of Trastuzumab-Associated Cardiotoxicity

    Edith Pituskin;John R Mackey;Sheri Koshman;Davinder Jassal

  • Effects of presurgical exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness among patients undergoing thoracic surgery for malignant lung lesions.

    Lee W. Jones;Carolyn J. Peddle;Neil D. Eves;Mark J. Haykowsky

  • Effect of endurance training on the determinants of peak exercise oxygen consumption in elderly patients with stable compensated heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Peter H. Brubaker;Kathryn P. Stewart;Timothy M. Morgan

  • Cardiac Remodeling in Response to 1 Year of Intensive Endurance Training

    Armin Arbab-Zadeh;Merja Perhonen;Erin Howden;Ronald M. Peshock

  • Exercise intolerance in cancer and the role of exercise therapy to reverse dysfunction

    Lee W Jones;Neil D Eves;Mark Haykowsky;Stephen J Freedland

  • The Addition of Manual Lymph Drainage to Compression Therapy For Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema: a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Margaret L McNeely;David J Magee;Alan W Lees;Keith M Bagnall

  • Skeletal muscle abnormalities and exercise intolerance in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

    Dalane W. Kitzman;Barbara J. Nicklas;William E. Kraus;Mary F. Lyles

  • Effect of Exercise Training on Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

    Lee W. Jones;Yuanyuan Liang;Edith N. Pituskin;Claudio L. Battaglini

  • Meta-Analysis of Aerobic Interval Training on Exercise Capacity and Systolic Function in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fractions

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Meagan P. Timmons;Calvin Kruger;Margaret McNeely

  • High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study

    Siddhartha S. Angadi;Siddhartha S. Angadi;Farouk Mookadam;Chong D. Lee;Wesley J. Tucker

  • Skeletal muscle composition and its relation to exercise intolerance in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Erik J. Kouba;Peter H. Brubaker;Barbara J. Nicklas

  • Prioritizing Functional Capacity as a Principal End Point for Therapies Oriented to Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

    Daniel E. Forman;Ross Arena;Rebecca Boxer;Mary A. Dolansky

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee W. Jones
Lee W. Jones Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dalane W. Kitzman
Dalane W. Kitzman Wake Forest University
John R. Mackey
John R. Mackey University of Alberta
Koon K. Teo
Koon K. Teo McMaster University
Justin A. Ezekowitz
Justin A. Ezekowitz University of Alberta
Daniel Kim
Daniel Kim Northeastern University
Jason R.B. Dyck
Jason R.B. Dyck University of Alberta
Kerry S. Courneya
Kerry S. Courneya University of Alberta
Gavin Y. Oudit
Gavin Y. Oudit University of Alberta
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in alternative or complementary pathways to a career in medicine, there are several flexible online degree options available. Nursing ranks among the most popular and fastest-growing healthcare professions in the United States, and online programs make it easier for working adults to advance their qualifications or transition into new roles.

If you want to become a nurse practitioner, you can explore online nurse practitioner programs that offer flexibility, affordability, and accredited curricula. Many students also search for the cheapest online MSN programs to earn a master’s in nursing and open doors to advanced positions and higher salaries.

For nurses seeking to enter education, leadership, or research, there are reputable online PhD programs nursing that can be completed alongside professional commitments. Registered nurses looking to advance can also find affordable rn to bsn programs that help build clinical skills and improve employability.

These diverse online options make it easier than ever to pursue healthcare careers or continue your education, wherever you are in your medical journey.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Haykowsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles