World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 53 4143 3965 1564 1443 196 18289

Michael J. Hayes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael J. Hayes between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael J. Hayes published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 10 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 7 publications
1987 2025

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael J. Hayes: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 5
1999 1
2000 4
2001 4
2002 5
2003 2
2004 6
2005 10
2006 4
2007 7
2008 6
2009 6
2010 1
2011 10
2012 5
2013 7
2014 11
2015 20
2016 8
2017 10
2018 12
2019 15
2020 18
2021 9
2022 5
2023 9
2024 3
2025 7
Total 220
Download as CSV

Michael J. Hayes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 196 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377 196
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael J. Hayes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Hayes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217 53
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael J. Hayes is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with particular emphasis on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, and Ocean Engineering.

The main topics of Michael J. Hayes's work include:

  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Climate variability and models
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Water resources management and optimization
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

They have published research articles in several scientific venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Climatology
  • Remote Sensing

Recent papers associated with Michael J. Hayes include:

  • "Czech Drought Monitor System for monitoring and forecasting agricultural drought and drought impacts," published in 2020 in the International Journal of Climatology
  • "Explainable machine learning for the prediction and assessment of complex drought impacts," published in 2023 in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Agricultural Drought Assessment in East Asia Using Satellite-Based Indices," published in 2020 in Remote Sensing
  • "Improved mapping and change detection of the start of the crop growing season in the US Corn Belt from long-term AVHRR NDVI," published in 2020 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • "Linking Drought Impacts to Drought Severity at the State Level," published in 2020 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorships with the following researchers:

  • Mark Svoboda
  • Kelly Helm Smith
  • Rezaul Mahmood
  • Deborah J. Bathke
  • Tonya Haigh

Best Publications

  • Monitoring the 1996 Drought Using the Standardized Precipitation Index

    Michael J. Hayes;Mark D. Svoboda;Donald A. Wilhite;Olga V. Vanyarkho

  • A Self-Calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index

    Nathan Wells;Steve Goddard;Michael J. Hayes

  • THE DROUGHT MONITOR

    Mark D. Svoboda;Doug LeComte;Mike Hayes;Richard Heim

  • The lincoln declaration on drought indices: Universal meteorological drought index recommended

    Michael Hayes;Mark Svoboda;Nicole Wall;Melissa Widhalm

  • Understanding the complex impacts of drought: A key to enhancing drought mitigation and preparedness

    Donald A. Wilhite;Mark D. Svoboda;Michael J. Hayes

  • Paleogeographic and paleotectonic setting of Laramide sedimentary basins in the central Rocky Mountain region

    William R. Dickinson;Margaret A. Klute;Michael J. Hayes;Susanne U. Janecke

  • Drought Monitoring with NDVI-Based Standardized Vegetation Index

    Albert J. Peters;Elizabeth A. Walter-Shea;Lei Ji;Andrés Viña

  • An evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index, the China-Z Index and the statistical Z-Score

    Hong Wu;Michael J. Hayes;Albert Weiss;Qi Hu

  • Are droughts becoming more frequent or severe in China based on the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index: 1951–2010?

    Meixiu Yu;Meixiu Yu;Qiongfang Li;Michael J. Hayes;Mark D. Svoboda

  • The Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI): A New Integrated Approach for Monitoring Drought Stress in Vegetation

    Jesslyn F. Brown;Brian D. Wardlow;Tsegaye Tadesse;Michael J. Hayes

  • Appropriate application of the standardized precipitation index in arid locations and dry seasons

    Hong Wu;Mark D. Svoboda;Michael J. Hayes;Donald A. Wilhite

  • The effect of the length of record on the standardized precipitation index calculation

    Hong Wu;Michael J. Hayes;Donald A. Wilhite;Mark D. Svoboda

  • Defining Ecological Drought for the Twenty-First Century

    Shelley D. Crausbay;Aaron R. Ramirez;Shawn L. Carter;Molly S. Cross

  • Planning for Drought: Moving from Crisis to Risk Management

    Donald A. Wilhite;Michael J. Hayes;Cody Knutson;Kelly Helm Smith

  • Measuring Economic Impacts of Drought: A Review and Discussion

    Ya Ding;Michael J. Hayes;Melissa Widhalm

  • Drought hazard assessment in the context of climate change for South Korea

    Won Ho Nam;Michael J. Hayes;Mark D. Svoboda;Tsegaye Tadesse

  • Application of relative drought indices in assessing climate-change impacts on drought conditions in Czechia

    M. Dubrovsky;Mark D. Svoboda;M. Trnka;Michael J. Hayes

  • Using the standardized precipitation index for flood risk monitoring

    R. A. Seiler;M. Hayes;L. Bressan

  • Reducing Drought Risk: Bridging Theory and Practice

    Michael J. Hayes;Olga V. Wilhelmi;Cody L. Knutson

  • Using NOAA AVHRR data to estimate maize production in the United States Corn Belt

    Unknown

  • Multi-GCM projections of future drought and climate variability indicators for the Mediterranean region

    Martin Dubrovský;Michael Hayes;Pierpaolo Duce;Miroslav Trnka

  • Drought indicators and triggers

    Anne C. Steinemann;Michael J. Hayes;Luiz F.N. Cavalcanti

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Svoboda
Mark Svoboda University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Donald A. Wilhite
Donald A. Wilhite University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Miroslav Trnka
Miroslav Trnka Czech Academy of Sciences
Brian D. Wardlow
Brian D. Wardlow University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Josef Eitzinger
Josef Eitzinger BOKU University
Zdeněk Žalud
Zdeněk Žalud Mendel University Brno
Petr Hlavinka
Petr Hlavinka Mendel University Brno
Kenneth G. Hubbard
Kenneth G. Hubbard University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Rudolf Brázdil
Rudolf Brázdil Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences graduates often explore various related fields to broaden their expertise and career options. For those interested in public administration and policy-making, pursuing a 1 year mpa online program offers a fast track to leadership roles in environmental agencies.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial in addressing environmental challenges. An accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide insights into community behaviors and societal impacts, enriching an environmental science career.

For professionals aiming for advanced research or academic positions, flexible doctoral options are essential. Several 1 year phd programs online no dissertation cater to this need, enabling degrees without the lengthy dissertation process, which can be ideal for experienced practitioners.

Additionally, educators and administrators can advance through structured programs like the eds to edd program, offering a seamless transition from a master's to a doctoral degree in education leadership within environmental studies contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Hayes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles