World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
12326
World Ranking
15510
National Ranking
6472

Nathan C Verberkmoes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan C Verberkmoes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 106 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nathan C Verberkmoes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan C Verberkmoes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan C Verberkmoes is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their professional background is connected to this research institution, which is known for its contributions to various scientific fields and applied research.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work listed for Nathan C Verberkmoes in the available data. Similarly, there are no awards detailed for this scientist.

Given the absence of specific publication records or research topics, the profile focuses mainly on the institutional affiliation, which suggests involvement in scientific activities related to the work conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Best Publications

  • Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla

    Michael A. Mahowald;Federico E. Rey;Henning Seedorf;Peter J. Turnbaugh

  • Community Proteomics of a Natural Microbial Biofilm

    Rachna J. Ram;Nathan C. VerBerkmoes;Michael P. Thelen;Michael P. Thelen;Gene W. Tyson

  • Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla.

    Kelly C. Wrighton;Brian C. Thomas;Itai Sharon;Christopher S. Miller

  • Shotgun metaproteomics of the human distal gut microbiota.

    Nathan C Verberkmoes;Alison L Russell;Manesh Shah;Adam Godzik

  • Multi-omics of permafrost, active layer and thermokarst bog soil microbiomes

    Jenni Hultman;Jenni Hultman;Mark P. Waldrop;Rachel Mackelprang;Rachel Mackelprang;Maude David

  • Detecting Differential and Correlated Protein Expression in Label-Free Shotgun Proteomics

    Bing Zhang;Nathan C. Verberkmoes;Michael A. Langston;Edward Uberbacher

  • Integrated Metagenomics/Metaproteomics Reveals Human Host-Microbiota Signatures of Crohn's Disease

    Alison R. Erickson;Brandi L. Cantarel;Regina Lamendella;Youssef El Darzi

  • Enigmatic, ultrasmall, uncultivated Archaea

    Brett J. Baker;Luis R. Comolli;Gregory J. Dick;Loren J. Hauser

  • Niche of harmful alga Aureococcus anophagefferens revealed through ecogenomics

    Christopher J. Gobler;Dianna L. Berry;Sonya T. Dyhrman;Steven W. Wilhelm

  • Systems biology: Functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics.

    Nathan C Verberkmoes;Vincent Denef;Robert {Bob} L Hettich;Jillian F. Banfield

  • Impact of Dietary Resistant Starch on the Human Gut Microbiome, Metaproteome, and Metabolome

    Tanja V. Maier;Marianna Lucio;Lang Ho Lee;Nathan C. VerBerkmoes

  • Strain-resolved community proteomics reveals recombining genomes of acidophilic bacteria

    Ian Lo;Vincent J. Denef;Nathan C. VerBerkmoes;Manesh B. Shah

  • Molecular Dynamics of the Shewanella oneidensis Response to Chromate Stress

    Steven D Brown;Melissa R Thompson;Nathan C Verberkmoes;Karuna Chourey

  • Community proteogenomics highlights microbial strain-variant protein expression within activated sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal

    Paul Wilmes;Anders F Andersson;Mark G Lefsrud;Margaret Wexler

  • Direct cellular lysis/protein extraction protocol for soil metaproteomics.

    Karuna Chourey;Janet Jansson;Nathan C Verberkmoes;Manesh B Shah

  • Metaproteomics of a gutless marine worm and its symbiotic microbial community reveal unusual pathways for carbon and energy use

    Manuel Kleiner;Cecilia Wentrup;Christian Lott;Hanno Teeling

  • Twelve previously unknown phage genera are ubiquitous in global oceans

    Karin Holmfeldt;Natalie Solonenko;Manesh B Shah;Kristen L Corrier

  • Discovery of a novel methanogen prevalent in thawing permafrost

    Rhiannon Mondav;Ben J. Woodcroft;Eun Hae Kim;Carmody K. Mccalley

  • Proteogenomic basis for ecological divergence of closely related bacteria in natural acidophilic microbial communities

    Vincent J. Denef;Linda H. Kalnejais;Ryan S. Mueller;Paul Wilmes

  • Shotgun metaproteomics of the human distal gut microbiota

    N.C. VerBerkmoes

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Hettich
Robert L. Hettich Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jillian F. Banfield
Jillian F. Banfield University of California, Berkeley
Janet K. Jansson
Janet K. Jansson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Kenneth H. Williams
Kenneth H. Williams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Steven W. Singer
Steven W. Singer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Philip E. Long
Philip E. Long Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Mary S. Lipton
Mary S. Lipton Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Loren Hauser
Loren Hauser Digital Infuzion (United States)
Michael J. Wilkins
Michael J. Wilkins Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering your next step after studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, a wide range of online programs can support your goals. For those interested in direct patient care, the ma to lpn bridge program is a fast-track option for medical assistants seeking to become Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs). This pathway can help you build on existing experience while qualifying for more advanced clinical roles.

Looking to advance your studies in biological sciences? online biology degree programs offer flexible, accelerated options broadly suited for students needing to balance study with work or other commitments. Those aiming for a nursing practice career may benefit from online associate rn programs, which prepare graduates for the NCLEX-RN licensure and a career as a Registered Nurse.

If nutrition science interests you, consider an online degree in nutrition. Careers in this field range from wellness consulting to clinical nutrition and public health. With so many online pathways, students can tailor their education for evolving careers in health, research, and allied sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan C Verberkmoes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles