World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 49 5951 5782 46 45 148 8294

Shih-Wei Lin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shih-Wei Lin between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shih-Wei Lin published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2009. 16 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2009. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shih-Wei Lin: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 9
2007 7
2008 9
2009 15
2010 11
2011 14
2012 10
2013 8
2014 14
2015 6
2016 8
2017 7
2018 7
2019 9
2020 8
2021 9
2022 13
2023 7
2024 14
2025 15
2026 1
Total 206
Download as CSV

Shih-Wei Lin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shih-Wei Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 148
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Shih-Wei Lin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shih-Wei Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 49
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shih-Wei Lin is affiliated with Chang Gung University in Taiwan and specializes in engineering, with a strong focus on industrial and manufacturing engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields, including electrical and electronic engineering, automotive engineering, building and construction, and computer networks and communications.

The primary topics covered by Shih-Wei Lin's work include advanced manufacturing and logistics optimization, scheduling and optimization algorithms, vehicle routing optimization methods, assembly line balancing optimization, transportation and mobility innovations, urban and freight transport logistics, and various optimization and packing problems.

Frequent publication venues for their research encompass:

  • Mathematics
  • IEEE Access
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Computers & Industrial Engineering

Shih-Wei Lin collaborates regularly with several coauthors, notably:

  • Kuo-Ching Ying
  • Vincent F. Yu
  • Pourya Pourhejazy
  • Chen-Yang Cheng
  • Panca Jodiawan

Among recent publications authored or coauthored by Shih-Wei Lin are:

  • Multi-temperature simulated annealing for optimizing mixed-blocking permutation flowshop scheduling problems, 2020, Expert Systems with Applications
  • New benchmark algorithm for hybrid flowshop scheduling with identical machines, 2021, Expert Systems with Applications

Other related works by frequent coauthor Vincent F. Yu include:

  • A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem With Parcel Lockers, 2022, IEEE Access
  • The Vehicle Routing Problem with Simultaneous Pickup and Delivery and Parcel Lockers, 2022, Mathematics

Additional relevant research from Kuo-Ching Ying includes:

  • Solving no-wait job-shop scheduling problems using a multi-start simulated annealing with bi-directional shift timetabling algorithm, 2020, Computers & Industrial Engineering

Best Publications

  • Particle swarm optimization for parameter determination and feature selection of support vector machines

    Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying;Shih-Chieh Chen;Zne-Jung Lee

  • Parameter determination of support vector machine and feature selection using simulated annealing approach

    Shih-Wei Lin;Zne-Jung Lee;Shih-Chieh Chen;Tsung-Yuan Tseng

  • A simulated annealing heuristic for the capacitated location routing problem

    Vincent F. Yu;Shih-Wei Lin;Wenyih Lee;Ching-Jung Ting

  • An intelligent algorithm with feature selection and decision rules applied to anomaly intrusion detection

    Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying;Chou-Yuan Lee;Zne-Jung Lee

  • Solving the truck and trailer routing problem based on a simulated annealing heuristic

    Shih-Wei Lin;Vincent F. Yu;Shuo-Yan Chou

  • Minimising makespan in distributed permutation flowshops using a modified iterated greedy algorithm

    Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying;Chien-Yi Huang

  • Applying hybrid meta-heuristics for capacitated vehicle routing problem

    Shih-Wei Lin;Zne-Jung Lee;Kuo-Ching Ying;Chou-Yuan Lee

  • A simulated annealing heuristic for the truck and trailer routing problem with time windows

    Shih-Wei Lin;Vincent F. Yu;Chung-Cheng Lu

  • A simulated annealing heuristic for the team orienteering problem with time windows

    Shih-Wei Lin;Vincent F. Yu

  • Minimizing makespan for the distributed hybrid flowshop scheduling problem with multiprocessor tasks

    Kuo-Ching Ying;Shih-Wei Lin;Shih-Wei Lin;Shih-Wei Lin

  • Dynamic parking negotiation and guidance using an agent-based platform

    Shuo-Yan Chou;Shih-Wei Lin;Chien-Chang Li

  • Multiprocessor task scheduling in multistage hybrid flow-shops: an ant colony system approach

    Kuo-Ching Ying;Shih-Wei Lin

  • An enhanced ant colony optimization (EACO) applied to capacitated vehicle routing problem

    Chou-Yuan Lee;Zne-Jung Lee;Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying

  • Minimizing makespan for solving the distributed no-wait flowshop scheduling problem

    Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying

  • Combining support vector machine with genetic algorithm to classify ultrasound breast tumor images.

    Wen Jie Wu;Shih Wei Lin;Woo Kyung Moon

  • Iterated reference greedy algorithm for solving distributed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problems

    Kuo-Ching Ying;Shih-Wei Lin;Shih-Wei Lin;Chen-Yang Cheng;Cheng-Ding He

  • Multi-start simulated annealing heuristic for the location routing problem with simultaneous pickup and delivery

    Vincent F. Yu;Shih-Wei Lin

  • Robust scheduling on a single machine to minimize total flow time

    Chung-Cheng Lu;Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying

  • Optimization of makespan for no-wait flowshop scheduling problems using efficient matheuristics

    Shih-Wei Lin;Shih-Wei Lin;Kuo-Ching Ying

  • Makespan minimization for scheduling unrelated parallel machines with setup times

    Kuo-Ching Ying;Zne-Jung Lee;Shih-Wei Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kuo-Ching Ying
Kuo-Ching Ying National Taipei University of Technology
Vincent F. Yu
Vincent F. Yu National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Chih-Cheng Hsieh
Chih-Cheng Hsieh National Tsing Hua University
Jatinder N. D. Gupta
Jatinder N. D. Gupta University of Alabama in Huntsville
Shun-Feng Su
Shun-Feng Su National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Woo Kyung Moon
Woo Kyung Moon Seoul National University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens the door to many flexible study and career options. For those just starting out, associate degrees offer a fast and practical way to build essential tech skills. These programs can be completed in two years or less and are a good fit for students seeking quick entry into the tech job market or planning to transfer to a bachelor’s program.

Many students look for affordable, flexible pathways to support their career goals. Choosing online accredited colleges ensures your degree is recognized and valued by employers. If you are interested in educational leadership within tech fields, some of the most affordable edd programs are now offered fully online, making advanced study accessible without high costs.

Tech careers go well beyond traditional CS roles. For creative minds, game design schools online provide specialized training in programming, art, and design—perfect for students passionate about interactive media. With so many options, online degrees can save time and money while helping you reach your career goals in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Shih-Wei Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles