World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Eliasziw

Michael Eliasziw

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
55463
World Ranking
14806
National Ranking
613

Michael Eliasziw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Eliasziw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 212 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Eliasziw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Eliasziw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Eliasziw is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a focused subfield in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work addresses the effects and risks associated with endocrine disrupting chemicals. This thematic focus is reflected in their recent research publications, emphasizing environmental impacts on human health.

The following topics represent the main focal areas of their research:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Michael Eliasziw has published research in the journal Environmental Research. Their recent paper is titled "Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI influences the associations between bisphenol and phthalate exposures and maternal weight changes and fat accumulation" (2024), which has garnered citations indicating engagement by the scientific community.

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include:

  • Rhonda C. Bell
  • Catherine J. Field
  • Jonathan W. Martin
  • Deborah Dewey
  • Nicole Létourneau

Michael Eliasziw's publication venues are specialized, with available data indicating a concentration in Environmental Research, reflecting alignment with their environmental health focus.

There is no record of book publications or awards associated with Michael Eliasziw in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis

    Barnett Hjm;Taylor Dw;Haynes Rb

  • Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

    H J Barnett;D W Taylor;M Eliasziw;A J Fox

  • A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy.

    Samuel Wiebe;Warren T. Blume;John P. Girvin;Michael Eliasziw

  • Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies

    S. D. Walter;M. Eliasziw;A. Donner

  • Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery

    P M Rothwell;M Eliasziw;S A Gutnikov;C P Warlow

  • Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

    PM Rothwell;M Eliasziw;SA Gutnikov;AJ Fox

  • Carotid artery stenosis: Gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis-society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference

    Edward G. Grant;Carol B. Benson;Gregory L. Moneta;Andrei V. Alexandrov

  • The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Surgical Results in 1415 Patients

    G. G. Ferguson;M. Eliasziw;H. W. K. Barr;G. P. Clagett

  • The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): A Phase II MRI-Based 9-Hour Window Acute Stroke Thrombolysis Trial With Intravenous Desmoteplase

    Werner Hacke;Greg Albers;Yasir Al-Rawi;Julien Bogousslavsky

  • The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

    Domenico Inzitari;Michael Eliasziw;Peter Gates;Brenda L. Sharpe

  • Sample size requirements for reliability studies

    Allan Donner;Michael Eliasziw

  • Statistical Methodology for the Concurrent Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability: Using Goniometric Measurements as an Example

    M Eliasziw;S L Young;M G Woodbury;K Fryday-Field

  • Carotid Plaque Area A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy

    J. David Spence;Michael Eliasziw;Maria DiCicco;Daniel G. Hackam

  • Fast assessment of stroke and transient ischaemic attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a randomised controlled pilot trial

    James Kennedy;Michael D Hill;Karla J Ryckborst;Michael Eliasziw

  • Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

    M. Eliasziw;J. Y. Streifler;A. J. Fox;V. C. Hachinski

  • Angiographically Defined Collateral Circulation and Risk of Stroke in Patients With Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis

    Robert D. Henderson;Michael Eliasziw;Allan J. Fox;Peter M. Rothwell

  • Long-term prognosis and effect of endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis and contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion: results from NASCET. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

    Andrew P. Gasecki;Michael Eliasziw;Gary G. Ferguson;Vladimir Hachinski

  • Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging

    P A Barber;M D Hill;M Eliasziw;A M Demchuk

  • Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference.

    Edward G. Grant;Carol B. Benson;Gregory L. Moneta;Andrei V. Alexandrov

  • Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis

    P.M. Rothwell;M. Eliasziw;S.A. Gutnikov

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan J. Fox
Allan J. Fox University of Toronto
Alastair M. Buchan
Alastair M. Buchan University of Oxford
Vladimir Hachinski
Vladimir Hachinski University of Western Ontario
Allan Donner
Allan Donner University of Western Ontario
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Peter M. Rothwell
Peter M. Rothwell University of Oxford
Scott B. Patten
Scott B. Patten University of Calgary
Suzanne Tough
Suzanne Tough University of Calgary
David A. Hanley
David A. Hanley University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring medicine in the USA, a variety of online degrees and career advancement pathways are available. These flexible options cater to diverse interests and backgrounds—whether you’re starting your journey or seeking to specialize further.

Nurses aiming to elevate their careers may consider asn to nurse practitioner programs. These bridge programs allow registered nurses with an associate degree to advance to a master’s level and take on more specialized or leadership roles.

Nutrition is another fast-growing healthcare field. If you are passionate about food science and health, an online nutrition degree offers a pathway into jobs ranging from dietetics to community nutrition.

Healthcare administration presents yet another rewarding career option; the best online mha programs are designed to prepare students for leadership roles within healthcare organizations.

For practicing RNs wanting to move ahead without clinical requirements, there are online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These programs increase career mobility and earning potential—all through flexible online study.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Eliasziw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles