World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
11218
World Ranking
4229
National Ranking
2358

John S. Cacciola publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Cacciola sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John S. Cacciola D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Cacciola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John S. Cacciola is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their academic profile does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues. There is no information available on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research in the provided data.

This absence of detailed publication and research data limits the scope of describing their specific areas of expertise or contributions to academic literature. Likewise, no awards or distinctions have been noted for this researcher.

The data confirms that John S. Cacciola is currently active and not deceased. As such, their career status remains ongoing, though further public details about their research interests and outputs would be necessary for a more comprehensive profile.

Best Publications

  • New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

    A. McLELLAN;Lester Luborsky;John Cacciola;Jeffrey Griffith

  • Independent assessment of manic and depressive symptoms by self-rating. Scale characteristics and implications for the study of mania.

    Mark S. Bauer;Paul Crits-Christoph;William A. Ball;Edward Dewees

  • Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: From retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring.

    A. Thomas McLellan;James R. McKay;Robert Forman;John Cacciola

  • A new measure of substance abuse treatment. Initial studies of the treatment services review.

    A. McLELLAN;Arthur Alterman;John Cacciola;David Metzger

  • Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of a “Lite” version of the Addiction Severity Index

    John S. Cacciola;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;A. Thomas McLellan;Yi-Ting Lin

  • Explanatory Style Change During Cognitive Therapy for Unipolar Depression

    Martin E. P. Seligman;Camilo Castellon;John Cacciola;Peter Schulman

  • The relationship of psychiatric comorbidity to treatment outcomes in methadone maintained patients.

    John S Cacciola;Arthur I Alterman;Megan J Rutherford;James R McKay

  • Gender differences in the relapse experiences of cocaine patients.

    James R. McKay;Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Rachel Kabasakalian-McKay

  • Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM).

    John S. Cacciola;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;Dominick DePhilippis;Dominick DePhilippis;Michelle L. Drapkin;Michelle L. Drapkin

  • Group counseling versus individualized relapse prevention aftercare following intensive outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: initial results.

    James R. McKay;Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • Personality disorders and treatment outcome in methadone maintenance patients.

    John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford;Arthur I. Alterman;James R. McKay

  • Initial validation of a computer-administered Addiction Severity Index: the ASI-MV.

    Stephen F. Bultler;Simon H. Budman;Risa J. Goldman;Frederick J. Newman

  • Reliability of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in Substance Abuse Patients.

    Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • Reliability and Validity of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in Women Methadone Patients

    Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;James R. McKay

  • The antisocial personality disorder diagnosis in substance abusers: problems and issues.

    Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola

  • Psychometric properties of the sixth version of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6) in Brazil

    Felix Kessler;John Cacciola;Arthur Alterman;Sibele Faller

  • Compliance with buprenorphine medication-assisted treatment and relapse to opioid use.

    Joseph Tkacz;Jamie Severt;John Cacciola;Charles Ruetsch

  • Reliability and validity of the alcohol short index of problems and a newly constructed drug short index of problems.

    Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan A. Ivey;Brian Habing

  • An examination of the cocaine relapse process

    James R. McKay;Megan J. Rutherford;Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola

  • Prediction of 7 months methadone maintenance treatment response by four measures of antisociality

    Arthur I Alterman;Megan J Rutherford;John S Cacciola;James R McKay

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur I. Alterman
Arthur I. Alterman University of Pennsylvania
Megan J. Rutherford
Megan J. Rutherford University of Washington
James R. McKay
James R. McKay University of Pennsylvania
A. Thomas McLellan
A. Thomas McLellan University of Pennsylvania
Paul A. McDermott
Paul A. McDermott University of Pennsylvania
Kevin G. Lynch
Kevin G. Lynch University of Pennsylvania
Kimberly C. Kirby
Kimberly C. Kirby Rowan University
Lester Luborsky
Lester Luborsky University of Pennsylvania
David S. Metzger
David S. Metzger University of Pennsylvania
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of specialized online programs and promising career options. One increasingly popular pathway is working towards Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification, an in-demand credential for professionals interested in applied behavior analysis.

The journey to becoming a BCBA can vary by location, so it’s crucial to understand the unique requirements in your area. For instance, if you’re interested in learning how to become a bcba in Lubbock, you’ll need to meet both educational and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, the bcba certification requirements in Madison emphasize the importance of accredited coursework and passing the board examination.

Students considering how to become a bcba in Memphis or wishing to understand Mesa bcba requirements should pay close attention to the number of supervised hours and continuing education needed. Many accredited universities now offer online psychology and BCBA-related programs, providing flexible options for busy professionals or remote learners. Exploring these online degrees can significantly expand your career opportunities while helping you meet state-specific certification standards in the field of psychology and behavior analysis.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Cacciola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles