World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
4241
World Ranking
8982
National Ranking
4756

Megan J. Rutherford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan J. Rutherford sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 60 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Megan J. Rutherford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan J. Rutherford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Megan J. Rutherford is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with specialized work in several subfields including Hematology, Genetics, Oncology, Physiology, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

The scientist's research covers a variety of topics that intersect with both clinical and biological aspects of disease and aging. Major themes include Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, Frailty in Older Adults, Nutrition and Health in Aging, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research, Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases, and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances.

Megan J. Rutherford has contributed to multiple publication venues, with frequent contributions to Gastroenterology, Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia, Value in Health, as well as single papers in PLoS ONE and Current Problems in Cancer.

Recent published papers by the researcher include the following:

  • Body mass index and physical frailty among older Mexican Americans: Findings from an 18-year follow up (2022) in PLoS ONE
  • Current and emerging strategies for the management of advanced/metastatic lung neuroendocrine tumors (2024) in Current Problems in Cancer
  • An Uncharacteristic Presentation of Evans Syndrome Following Treatment With Dupilumab (2021) in Cureus

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Megan J. Rutherford include:

  • Hoora Moradian
  • Fei Huang
  • Ajibade Ashaye
  • Mehul Dalal
  • Elias Jabbour

Their work encompasses both clinical investigations and analyses of disease mechanisms, appearing in journals that focus on cancer, hematology, geriatrics, and related medical fields. This reflects a multidisciplinary approach bridging patient-centered research and molecular studies.

Best Publications

  • DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial.

    Thomas A. Widiger;Remi Cadoret;Robert Hare;Lee Robins

  • The relationship of psychiatric comorbidity to treatment outcomes in methadone maintained patients.

    John S Cacciola;Arthur I Alterman;Megan J Rutherford;James R McKay

  • Gender differences in the relapse experiences of cocaine patients.

    James R. McKay;Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Rachel Kabasakalian-McKay

  • Group counseling versus individualized relapse prevention aftercare following intensive outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: initial results.

    James R. McKay;Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • Personality disorders and treatment outcome in methadone maintenance patients.

    John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford;Arthur I. Alterman;James R. McKay

  • Reliability of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in Substance Abuse Patients.

    Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • Reliability and Validity of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in Women Methadone Patients

    Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;James R. McKay

  • An examination of the cocaine relapse process

    James R. McKay;Megan J. Rutherford;Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola

  • Prediction of 7 months methadone maintenance treatment response by four measures of antisociality

    Arthur I Alterman;Megan J Rutherford;John S Cacciola;James R McKay

  • Treatment response of antisocial substance abusers.

    John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;Megan J. Rutherford;Edward C. Snider

  • Predictors of participation in aftercare sessions and self-help groups following completion of intensive outpatient treatment for substance abuse.

    J R McKay;A T McLellan;A I Alterman;J S Cacciola

  • Latent Structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in Methadone Maintenance Patients

    Arthur I. Alterman;Paul A. McDermott;John S. Cacciola;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • A cocaine-positive baseline urine predicts outpatient treatment attrition and failure to attain initial abstinence

    Arthur I Alterman;Kyle Kampman;Chris R Boardman;John S Cacciola

  • Comparability of Telephone and In-Person Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) Diagnoses:

    John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;Megan J. Rutherford;James R. McKay

  • A typology of antisociality in methadone patients.

    Arthur I. Alterman;Paul A. McDermott;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • The 2-year test-retest reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist Revised in methadone patients.

    Megan Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;James R. McKay

  • Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy in cocaine-dependent women.

    Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman

  • New scales to assess change in the Addiction Severity Index for the opioid, cocaine, and alcohol dependent.

    Arthur I. Alterman;Paul A. McDermott;Terry G. Cook;David Metzger

  • The relationship of alcohol use to cocaine relapse in cocaine dependent patients in an aftercare study.

    J R McKay;A I Alterman;M J Rutherford;J S Cacciola

  • Generality of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised factors over prisoners and substance-dependent patients.

    Paul A. McDermott;Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • Response to methadone maintenance and counseling in antisocial patients with and without major depression

    Arthur I. Alterman;Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;James R. McKAY

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur I. Alterman
Arthur I. Alterman University of Pennsylvania
John S. Cacciola
John S. Cacciola University of Pennsylvania
James R. McKay
James R. McKay University of Pennsylvania
Paul A. McDermott
Paul A. McDermott University of Pennsylvania
A. Thomas McLellan
A. Thomas McLellan University of Pennsylvania
David S. Metzger
David S. Metzger University of Pennsylvania
George E. Woody
George E. Woody University of Pennsylvania
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania
Robert D. Hare
Robert D. Hare University of British Columbia
Mary C. Zanarini
Mary C. Zanarini Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying psychology in the USA, there are a variety of related online degrees and career options to explore. School counseling is a popular path, allowing you to make a direct impact on students’ academic and emotional well-being. Each state has unique qualifications and certification requirements for school counselors.

For example, those looking into North Dakota school counselor education requirements will find that obtaining a master’s degree in school counseling or a related field is typically essential, along with passing a state-approved exam. If you plan to work in Ohio, you'll need to review the Ohio school counselor certification requirements, which also emphasize graduate education and supervised practice hours.

Other states, such as Oklahoma, have additional steps; you can learn more in the guide on how to become a school counselor in Oklahoma. Similarly, the steps to meet Oregon school counselor certification requirements involve specific coursework and testing.

Considering an online degree program can offer flexibility while ensuring you meet your state’s educational standards. Researching state-specific requirements is crucial as you plan your psychology career path.

Best Scientists Citing Megan J. Rutherford

Recently Published Articles