World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
80
Citations
20311
World Ranking
1464
National Ranking
876

Arthur I. Alterman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur I. Alterman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 252 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arthur I. Alterman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur I. Alterman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur I. Alterman is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their professional activity focuses primarily on academic research and scientific inquiry within this institution.

While there is no detailed record of recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues associated with their work, the profile highlights their ongoing engagement in scholarly pursuits.

There is no available information regarding specific fields or subfields of study, main topics of their research, or book publications attributed to this researcher.

No data is recorded about awards or recognitions received by Arthur I. Alterman.

This profile reflects the current available information on the scientist's affiliations and academic standing without further specifics about their research output or thematic focus areas.

Best Publications

  • Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence

    Joseph R. Volpicelli;Arthur I. Alterman;Motoi Hayashida;Charles P. O'Brien

  • Naltrexone and Alcohol Dependence: Role of Subject Compliance

    Joseph R. Volpicelli;Karen C. Rhines;Jared S. Rhines;Laura A. Volpicelli

  • The Addiction Severity Index at 25: origins, contributions and transitions.

    A. Thomas McLellan;John C. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;Samuel H. Rikoon

  • Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: Role of treatment services.

    A. Thomas McLellan;Arthur I. Alterman;David S. Metzger;Grant R. Grissom

  • A new measure of substance abuse treatment. Initial studies of the treatment services review.

    A. McLELLAN;Arthur Alterman;John Cacciola;David Metzger

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: Reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons.

    A. Thomas McLellan;George E. Woody;David Metzger;James McKay

  • Vulnerability to alcoholism in men: a behavior-genetic perspective.

    Ralph E. Tarter;Arthur I. Alterman;Kathleen L. Edwards

  • Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of a “Lite” version of the Addiction Severity Index

    John S. Cacciola;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;A. Thomas McLellan;Yi-Ting Lin

  • DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial.

    Thomas A. Widiger;Remi Cadoret;Robert Hare;Lee Robins

  • Adolescent sons of alcoholics: neuropsychological and personality characteristics.

    Ralph E. Tarter;Andrea M. Hegedus;Gerald Goldstein;Carolyn Shelly

  • Reliability and validity of the cocaine selective severity assessment

    Kyle M. Kampman;Kyle M. Kampman;Joseph R. Volpicelli;Joseph R. Volpicelli;David E. Mcginnis;Arthur I. Alterman;Arthur I. Alterman

  • The relationship of psychiatric comorbidity to treatment outcomes in methadone maintained patients.

    John S Cacciola;Arthur I Alterman;Megan J Rutherford;James R McKay

  • Antisocial personality disorder in patients with substance abuse disorders: a problematic diagnosis?

    Gerstley Lj;Alterman Ai;McLellan At;Woody Ge

  • Preparations for AIDS vaccine trials. An automated version of the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB): enhancing the assessment of risk behaviors.

    H A Navaline;E C Snider;C J Petro;D Tobin

  • Gender differences in the relapse experiences of cocaine patients.

    James R. McKay;Megan J. Rutherford;John S. Cacciola;Rachel Kabasakalian-McKay

  • Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM).

    John S. Cacciola;John S. Cacciola;Arthur I. Alterman;Dominick DePhilippis;Dominick DePhilippis;Michelle L. Drapkin;Michelle L. Drapkin

  • Interviewer severity ratings and composite scores of the ASI: a further look

    Arthur I. Alterman;Arthur I. Alterman;Lawrence S. Brown;Arturo Zaballero;James R. McKay

  • Group counseling versus individualized relapse prevention aftercare following intensive outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: initial results.

    James R. McKay;Arthur I. Alterman;John S. Cacciola;Megan J. Rutherford

  • Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital substance abuse rehabilitation program.

    J R McKay;A I Alterman;A T McLellan;E C Snider

  • Relationship of Perceived Competencies, Perceived Social Support, and Gender to Substance Use in Young Adolescents

    Patricia D. Lifrak;James R. Mckay;Anthony Rostain;Arthur I. Alterman

  • Alcohol in Human Violence

    Arthur I. Alterman

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Cacciola
John S. Cacciola University of Pennsylvania
James R. McKay
James R. McKay University of Pennsylvania
Megan J. Rutherford
Megan J. Rutherford University of Washington
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania
A. Thomas McLellan
A. Thomas McLellan University of Pennsylvania
Ralph E. Tarter
Ralph E. Tarter University of Pittsburgh
Paul A. McDermott
Paul A. McDermott University of Pennsylvania
Kevin G. Lynch
Kevin G. Lynch University of Pennsylvania
George E. Woody
George E. Woody University of Pennsylvania
David S. Metzger
David S. Metzger University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up flexible and affordable options for learners across the USA. Many students are prioritizing cost-effective education, which is crucial with the rising cost of traditional campus programs. Fortunately, several accredited institutions now offer quality psychology courses online that won’t break the bank.

Affordability matters, and there are many choices available. For instance, if you're interested in studying in Illinois, you can review the cheapest psychology programs in Illinois. Similarly, Indiana residents can explore the cheapest psychology degrees in Indiana, while those in Kentucky might consider the affordable psychology programs in Kentucky. If you’re aiming for opportunities in a major city, you’ll find a variety of most affordable psychology degree programs in Los Angeles as well.

Completing an online psychology program can lead to diverse career pathways, including counseling, human resources, and research. Whether you're pursuing a bachelor’s or a graduate degree, consider flexible, affordable online options to reach your career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur I. Alterman

Recently Published Articles