World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
56
Citations
9236
World Ranking
2878
National Ranking
1018

Matteo Detto publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Detto sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 208 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Matteo Detto D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Detto sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matteo Detto is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States and contributes extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research primarily addresses global and planetary change, ecology, atmospheric science, nature and landscape conservation, and ecological modeling. The scholar's work spans a variety of interconnected topics, including plant water relations and carbon dynamics, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, remote sensing in agriculture, species distribution and climate change, plant and animal studies, peatlands and wetlands ecology, and tree-ring climate responses.

Their recent publications include:

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network (2020), published in Biological Conservation
  • Benchmarking and parameter sensitivity of physiological and vegetation dynamics using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) at Barro Colorado Island, Panama (2020), published in Biogeosciences
  • FLUXNET-CH 4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands (2021), published in Earth system science data
  • Hydraulically-vulnerable trees survive on deep-water access during droughts in a tropical forest (2021), published in New Phytologist
  • The interspecific growth-mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure (2020), published in Nature Ecology & Evolution

Matteo Detto frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Nate G. McDowell, Oliver Sonnentag, Jin Wu, Shawn Serbin, and Alistair Rogers. These partnerships have contributed to a substantial number of publications and multidisciplinary research output.

The scholar has published in several well-known scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • New Phytologist
  • Biogeosciences
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Remote Sensing of Environment

Their work reflects a broad engagement with environmental science, applying a range of techniques and perspectives to better understand ecological and planetary processes. Their research contributions integrate field observations, modeling, and data synthesis to advance knowledge on forest dynamics, ecosystem function, and environmental change.

Best Publications

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought-kill and recovery patterns.

    A. T. Trugman;M. Detto;M. K. Bartlett;D. Medvigy

  • Consequences of defaunation for a tropical tree community

    Rhett D Harrison;Rhett D Harrison;Sylvester Tan;Joshua B. Plotkin;Ferry Slik

  • Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy

    Matteo Detto;Nicola Montaldo;John D. Albertson;Marco Mancini

  • MODIS-derived global land products of shortwave radiation and diffuse and total photosynthetically active radiation at 5 km resolution from 2000

    Youngryel Ryu;Chongya Jiang;Hideki Kobayashi;Matteo Detto

  • Evaluating uncertainty in mapping forest carbon with airborne LiDAR

    Joseph Mascaro;Joseph Mascaro;Matteo Detto;Gregory P. Asner;Helene C. Muller-Landau

  • Greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, H2O) fluxes from drained and flooded agricultural peatlands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

    Jaclyn A. Hatala;Matteo Detto;Matteo Detto;Oliver Sonnentag;Oliver Sonnentag;Steven J. Deverel

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • Multiscale analysis of temporal variability of soil CO2 production as influenced by weather and vegetation

    Rodrigo Vargas;Matteo Detto;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Michael F. Allen

  • Temporal Dynamics in Soil Oxygen and Greenhouse Gases in Two Humid Tropical Forests

    Daniel Liptzin;Daniel Liptzin;Whendee L. Silver;Matteo Detto

  • Benchmarking and parameter sensitivity of physiological and vegetation dynamics using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) at Barro Colorado Island, Panama

    Charles D. Koven;Ryan G. Knox;Rosie A. Fisher;Jeffrey Q. Chambers;Jeffrey Q. Chambers

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of CO2 in relation to climate: a cross-biome analysis across multiple time scales

    P. C. Stoy;P. C. Stoy;A. D. Richardson;D. D. Baldocchi;G. G. Katul

  • FLUXNET-CH4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands

    Kyle B. Delwiche;Sara Helen Knox;Avni Malhotra;Etienne Fluet-Chouinard

  • Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks

    M. Réjou-Méchain;Helene C. Muller-Landau;Matteo Detto;S. C. Thomas

  • The challenges of measuring methane fluxes and concentrations over a peatland pasture

    Dennis D. Baldocchi;Matteo Detto;Oliver Sonnentag;Joe Verfaillie

  • On the temporal upscaling of evapotranspiration from instantaneous remote sensing measurements to 8-day mean daily-sums

    Youngryel Ryu;Youngryel Ryu;Dennis D. Baldocchi;T. Andrew Black;Matteo Detto

  • Comparing laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes using the eddy covariance method

    Matteo Detto;Joseph Verfaillie;Frank Anderson;Liukang Xu

  • Large Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Temperate Peatland Pasture

    Yit Arn Teh;Yit Arn Teh;Whendee L. Silver;Oliver Sonnentag;Matteo Detto

  • Gross ecosystem photosynthesis causes a diurnal pattern in methane emission from rice

    Jaclyn A. Hatala;Matteo Detto;Matteo Detto;Dennis D. Baldocchi

  • Bias in the detection of negative density dependence in plant communities.

    Matteo Detto;Matteo Detto;Marco D. Visser;S. Joseph Wright;Stephen W. Pacala

  • Tropospheric ozone reduces carbon assimilation in trees: estimates from analysis of continuous flux measurements.

    Silvano Fares;Rodrigo Vargas;Matteo Detto;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of CO2 in relation to climate

    P. C. Stoy;A. D. Richardson;D. D. Baldocchi;G. G. Katul

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis D. Baldocchi
Dennis D. Baldocchi University of California, Berkeley
Oliver Sonnentag
Oliver Sonnentag University of Montreal
Helene C. Muller-Landau
Helene C. Muller-Landau Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Stuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Nate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
S. Joseph Wright
S. Joseph Wright Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Sean M. McMahon
Sean M. McMahon Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Stephen P. Hubbell
Stephen P. Hubbell University of California, Los Angeles
Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to a range of related career paths and online degree options. For those interested in the intersection of research, data, and resource management, consider programs at colleges with library science programs, which focus on information organization and environmental data stewardship.

If you are passionate about communication and biology, accredited online health programs are worth exploring. A top option is earning your master’s through asha accredited online slp master's programs to help people with speech or language disorders—a field that frequently draws on knowledge of human evolution and development.

Non-majors can also enter these fields via alternative pathways. For example, if you have a background in communication sciences, the SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates offers a direct transition into speech-language pathology.

Similarly, those without a nursing degree can pursue healthcare roles through accelerated bsn programs for non nurses, providing a fast-track to careers that combine science, research, and medical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Matteo Detto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles