World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
42691
World Ranking
13872
National Ranking
7041

Daniel E. Forman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel E. Forman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 423 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel E. Forman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel E. Forman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel E. Forman is primarily affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research is concentrated in the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other notable subfields of study include Physiology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Surgery.

Their recent papers cover a range of topics within cardiovascular health and aging. These include:

  • Sarcopenia and Cardiovascular Diseases, 2023, published in Circulation
  • Interventions for Frailty Among Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Heart Failure, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Association of Statin Use With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in US Veterans 75 Years and Older, 2020, JAMA
  • Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, 2022, Circulation

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Peggy M. Cawthon, Anne B. Newman, Bret H. Goodpaster, Paul M. Coen, and Parag Goyal. These collaborations reflect a strong network within their research community.

Publications by Daniel E. Forman are often found in several key journals associated with cardiovascular and geriatric medicine. The most frequent venues include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

The core topics covered by their research encompass:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Best Publications

  • 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Scott M. Grundy;Neil J. Stone;Alison L. Bailey;Craig Beam

  • 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol

    Scott M. Grundy;Neil J. Stone;Alison L. Bailey;Craig Beam

  • Clinician’s Guide to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Adults A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Gary J. Balady;Ross Arena;Kathy Sietsema;Jonathan Myers

  • Exercise Standards for Testing and Training A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Gerald F. Fletcher;Philip A. Ades;Paul Kligfield;Ross A. Arena

  • 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary

    Scott M. Grundy;Neil J. Stone;Alison L. Bailey;Craig Beam

  • Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure.

    Daniel E. Forman;Javed Butler;Yongfei Wang;William T. Abraham

  • Frailty Assessment in the Cardiovascular Care of Older Adults

    Jonathan Afilalo;Karen Patton Alexander;Michael J. Mack;Mathew S. Maurer

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Win Kuang Shen;Robert S. Sheldon;David G. Benditt;Mitchell I. Cohen

  • The prognostic importance of different definitions of worsening renal function in congestive heart failure.

    Stephen S. Gottlieb;William Abraham;Javed Butler;Daniel E. Forman

  • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEART FAILURE TREATMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF WORSENING RENAL FUNCTION AMONG HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

    Javed Butler;Daniel E Forman;William T Abraham;Stephen S Gottlieb

  • A branched-chain amino acid metabolite drives vascular fatty acid transport and causes insulin resistance

    Cholsoon Jang;Sungwhan F Oh;Shogo Wada;Glenn C Rowe

  • Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY.

    Randal J. Thomas;Alexis L. Beatty;Theresa M. Beckie;La Princess C. Brewer

  • The Importance of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the United States: The Need for a National Registry: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

    Leonard A. Kaminsky;Ross A. Arena;Theresa M. Beckie;Peter H. Brubaker

  • Randomized trial of progressive resistance training to counteract the myopathy of chronic heart failure.

    Charles T. Pu;Charles T. Pu;Meredith T. Johnson;Meredith T. Johnson;Daniel E. Forman;Daniel E. Forman;Jeffrey M. Hausdorff

  • Multimorbidity in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease

    Daniel E. Forman;Mathew S. Maurer;Cynthia Boyd;Ralph Brindis

  • Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of the Older Adult Population A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society

    Michael W. Rich;Deborah A. Chyun;Adam H. Skolnick;Karen P. Alexander

  • Tai Chi Exercise in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Gloria Y. Yeh;Ellen P. McCarthy;Peter M. Wayne;Lynne W. Stevenson

  • Cardiac care for older adults. Time for a new paradigm.

    Daniel E. Forman;Michael W. Rich;Karen P. Alexander;Susan Zieman

  • Prioritizing Functional Capacity as a Principal End Point for Therapies Oriented to Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

    Daniel E. Forman;Ross Arena;Rebecca Boxer;Mary A. Dolansky

  • Exercise Standards for Testing and Training: A Scientific Statement From the American

    Jonathan Rhodes;Paul D. Thompson;Mark A. Williams;Lola A. Coke

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross Arena
Ross Arena University of Illinois at Chicago
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Karen P. Alexander
Karen P. Alexander Duke University
Carl J. Lavie
Carl J. Lavie University of Queensland
Mathew S. Maurer
Mathew S. Maurer Columbia University
Marco Guazzi
Marco Guazzi University of Milan
Michael W. Rich
Michael W. Rich Washington University in St. Louis
Dalane W. Kitzman
Dalane W. Kitzman Wake Forest University
Nanette K. Wenger
Nanette K. Wenger Emory University
Jerome L. Fleg
Jerome L. Fleg National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up several related online degree options and alternative career pathways in healthcare. For students interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding online courses offer an affordable path into a vital support role within medical offices and hospitals.

Nursing is another popular career route. Many aspiring nurses look for cheap online nursing programs to begin their journey efficiently and cost-effectively. After gaining experience, advancing to higher roles is possible through specialized programs such as the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs, which prepare graduates for primary and advanced patient care roles.

For those aiming for top-tier positions in education, leadership, or research, pursuing a phd in nursing can open a wealth of opportunities. These flexible, online healthcare pathways allow students to balance work and study while developing skills that are in high demand within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel E. Forman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles