World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5396 5011 2952 2678 198 11539

Nathan A. Gillespie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nathan A. Gillespie between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nathan A. Gillespie published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2019. 36 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2019. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 22 publications
1999 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nathan A. Gillespie: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 9
2005 3
2006 6
2007 6
2008 2
2009 3
2010 0
2011 3
2012 8
2013 9
2014 5
2015 7
2016 14
2017 18
2018 26
2019 30
2020 16
2021 26
2022 21
2023 17
2024 14
2025 22
Total 273
Download as CSV

Nathan A. Gillespie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan A. Gillespie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 198
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nathan A. Gillespie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan A. Gillespie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nathan A. Gillespie is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States. Their research spans medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong concentration in genetics, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, and clinical psychology.

The primary topics of their work include genetic associations and epidemiology, dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, cannabis and cannabinoid research, epigenetics and DNA methylation, as well as alcohol consumption and health effects.

Gillespie has published extensively in several key scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include Alzheimer's & Dementia, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Psychological Medicine, Neurobiology of Aging, and Twin Research and Human Genetics.

Notable recent papers by Gillespie include:

  • Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use, 2022, Nature
  • A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Multivariate genome-wide association meta-analysis of over 1 million subjects identifies loci underlying multiple substance use disorders, 2023, Nature Mental Health
  • Multi-ancestry study of the genetics of problematic alcohol use in over 1 million individuals, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • Genetic correlations and genome-wide associations of cortical structure in general population samples of 22,824 adults, 2020, Nature Communications

Collaborations are a significant component of Gillespie's work. Frequent co-authors include Carol E. Franz, William S. Kremen, Michael J. Lyons, Michael C. Neale, and Chandra A. Reynolds.

Best Publications

  • Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group.

    L Schmaal;D P Hibar;P G Sämann;G B Hall

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • Transancestral GWAS of alcohol dependence reveals common genetic underpinnings with psychiatric disorders

    Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters;Renato Polimanti;Emma C. Johnson;Jeanette N. McClintick

  • GWAS of lifetime cannabis use reveals new risk loci, genetic overlap with psychiatric traits, and a causal influence of schizophrenia

    Joëlle A. Pasman;Karin J. H. Verweij;Karin J. H. Verweij;Zachary Gerring;Sven Stringer

  • The relationship between stressful life events, the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and major depression

    Nathan A. Gillespie;John B. Whitfield;Ben Williams;Andrew C. Heath

  • A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder

    Emma C Johnson;Ditte Demontis;Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson;Raymond K Walters

  • The genetic and environmental relationship between Cloninger's dimensions of temperament and character.

    Nathan A. Gillespie;C. Robert Cloninger;Andrew C. Heath;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    L. Schmaal;D.J. Veltman;T.G.M. van Erp;P.G. Sämann

  • The genetics of addiction-a translational perspective.

    Arpana Agrawal;K. J.H. Verweij;K. J.H. Verweij;N. A. Gillespie;Andrew Heath

  • A Genome-Wide Analysis of Liberal and Conservative Political Attitudes

    Peter K. Hatemi;Nathan A. Gillespie;Lindon J. Eaves;Brion S. Maher

  • Genetic Basis of Male Pattern Baldness

    Dale R Nyholt;Dale R Nyholt;Nathan A Gillespie;Andrew C Heath;Nicholas G Martin

  • Recent advances in the genetic epidemiology and molecular genetics of substance use disorders

    Kenneth S Kendler;Xiangning Chen;Danielle Dick;Hermine Maes

  • Genome-wide association study of lifetime cannabis use based on a large meta-analytic sample of 32 330 subjects from the International Cannabis Consortium

    S Stringer;C.C. Minică;Karin J. H. Verweij;H Mbarek

  • The Nature of Nurture: Using a Virtual-Parent Design to Test Parenting Effects on Children's Educational Attainment in Genotyped Families.

    Timothy C. Bates;Brion S. Maher;Sarah E. Medland;Kerrie McAloney

  • Creating a Social World: A Developmental Twin Study of Peer-Group Deviance

    Kenneth S. Kendler;Kristen C. Jacobson;Charles O. Gardner;Nathan Gillespie

  • A genome scan for eye color in 502 twin families: Most variation is due to a QTL on chromosome 15q

    Gu Zhu;David M. Evans;David L. Duffy;Grant W. Montgomery

  • Pathways to cannabis abuse: a multi-stage model from cannabis availability, cannabis initiation and progression to abuse

    Nathan A Gillespie;Michael C Neale;Kenneth S Kendler

  • Resting State Abnormalities of the Default Mode Network in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Lisa T Eyler;Jeremy A Elman;Sean N Hatton;Sarah Gough

  • Factor and item-response analysis DSM-IV criteria for abuse of and dependence on cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, sedatives, stimulants and opioids.

    Nathan A. Gillespie;Michael C. Neale;Carol A. Prescott;Steven H. Aggen

  • Perceived social support in a large community sample--age and sex differences.

    W. L. Coventry;N. A. Gillespie;A. C. Heath;N. G. Martin

  • Subcortical brain structure and suicidal behaviour in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis from the ENIGMA-MDD working group.

    M E Rentería;M E Rentería;L Schmaal;D P Hibar;B Couvy-Duchesne;B Couvy-Duchesne

  • Erratum: The genetics of addiction - a translational perspective (Translational Psychiatry (2012) 2 (e140) DOI: 10.1038/tp.2012.54)

    A. Agrawal;K. J. H. Verweij;N. A. Gillespie;A. C. Heath

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Kenneth S. Kendler
Kenneth S. Kendler Virginia Commonwealth University
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen University of California, San Diego
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Margaret J. Wright
Margaret J. Wright University of Queensland
Michael C. Neale
Michael C. Neale Virginia Commonwealth University
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud
Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud University of Oslo
Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to many fulfilling careers, especially in counseling and mental health services. One increasingly popular pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor. This role is vital in helping individuals recover from addiction and improve their quality of life.

Many professionals start by earning an online psychology degree, which offers flexibility and access to reputable programs from anywhere in the country. Local requirements for counselors can vary. For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Laredo must meet specific state guidelines. Similarly, prospective counselors should review the process for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Las Vegas to understand the educational and licensing standards for Nevada.

It's essential to know the academic paths and certifications required in different cities. For those exploring options, learning about Lexington substance abuse counselors education requirements or Lincoln substance abuse counselors education requirements provides valuable insight into regional differences.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can set you on the path to help others, while also offering the qualifications needed for various counseling careers across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan A. Gillespie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles