World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
9231
World Ranking
4515
National Ranking
1679

Dusan Odstrcil publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dusan Odstrcil sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 202 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Dusan Odstrcil D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dusan Odstrcil sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dusan Odstrcil is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research expertise lies primarily within the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a particular focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics. The body of work spans various subfields and topics, reflecting a comprehensive engagement with solar, planetary, and space plasma dynamics as well as astro and planetary science.

Odstrcil's main fields of study include:

  • Physics and Astronomy

Their research encompasses several subfields of study:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Within these fields, Odstrcil has contributed to numerous topics, notably:

  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics

The scientist has several recent papers published mostly between 2020 and 2021, covering solar system missions, space plasma observations, and planetary science investigations. These papers include:

  • "Investigating Mercury's Environment with the Two-Spacecraft BepiColombo Mission," (2020) published in Space Science Reviews
  • "The Heliospheric Current Sheet in the Inner Heliosphere Observed by the Parker Solar Probe," (2020) published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
  • "BepiColombo Science Investigations During Cruise and Flybys at the Earth, Venus and Mercury," (2021) published in Space Science Reviews
  • "Solar Wind Streams and Stream Interaction Regions Observed by the Parker Solar Probe with Corresponding Observations at 1 au," (2020) published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
  • "Energetic Particle Increases Associated with Stream Interaction Regions," (2020) published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Odstrcil frequently collaborates with several researchers within the space sciences community. Their most common coauthors are:

  • M. L. Stevens
  • C. N. Arge
  • M. L. Mays
  • G. C. Ho
  • P. L. Whittlesey

Most of Odstrcil's publications appear in a core set of venues engaged in astrophysical and space science research. These include:

  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
  • Space Science Reviews
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Modeling 3-D solar wind structure

    D. Odstrcil

  • Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event

    D. Odstrcil;P. Riley;X. P. Zhao

  • Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME

    C.N. Arge;J.G. Luhmann;D. Odstrcil;C.J. Schrijver

  • Improved Method for Specifying Solar Wind Speed Near the Sun

    Charles N. Arge;Dusan Odstrcil;Victor J. Pizzo;Leslie R. Mayer

  • Three-dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 2. CME launched adjacent to the streamer belt

    D. Odstrčil;V. J. Pizzo

  • Three-dimensional propagation of CMEs in a structured solar wind flow: 1. CME launched within the streamer belt

    Unknown

  • Propagation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary coronal mass ejection in evolving solar wind structures

    D. Odstrcil;D. Odstrcil;V. J. Pizzo;C. N. Arge

  • Ensemble Modeling of CMEs Using the WSA–ENLIL+Cone Model

    M. L. Mays;M. L. Mays;A. Taktakishvili;A. Taktakishvili;A. Pulkkinen;P. J. MacNeice

  • Distortion of the interplanetary magnetic field by three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections in a structured solar wind

    D. Odstrcil;V. J. Pizzo

  • Ensemble modeling of CMEs using the WSA-ENLIL+Cone model

    M. L. Mays;A. Taktakishvili;A. A. Pulkkinen;P. J. MacNeice

  • Flux cancellation and coronal mass ejections

    Jon A. Linker;Zoran Mikić;Roberto Lionello;Pete Riley

  • Characteristics of kinematics of a coronal mass ejection during the 2010 august 1 CME–CME interaction event

    Manuela Temmer;Bojan Vršnak;Tanja Rollett;Bianca Bein

  • Metrics for solar wind prediction models: Comparison of empirical, hybrid, and physics-based schemes with 8 years of L1 observations

    M. J. Owens;Harlan E. Spence;S. McGregor;W. J. Hughes

  • Fitting flux ropes to a global MHD solution: a comparison of techniques

    Pete Riley;J.A. Linker;R. Lionello;Z. Mikić

  • Interplanetary coronal mass ejection observed at STEREO-A, Mars, comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Saturn, and New Horizons en route to Pluto: Comparison of its Forbush decreases at 1.4, 3.1, and 9.9 AU

    Olivier Witasse;Beatriz Sánchez-Cano;M. L. Mays;P. Kajdič

  • Influence of the ambient solar wind flow on the propagation behavior of interplanetary CMEs

    Manuela Temmer;Tanja Rollett;Christian Möstl;Astrid M. Veronig

  • Initial coupling of coronal and heliospheric numerical magnetohydrodynamic codes

    Dusan Odstrcil;Dusan Odstrcil;Victor J. Pizzo;Jon A. Linker;Pete Riley

  • Interactions between Coronal Mass Ejections Viewed in Coordinated Imaging and in situ Observations

    Ying D. Liu;Ying D. Liu;Janet G. Luhmann;Christian Möstl;Christian Möstl;Christian Möstl;Juan C. Martinez-Oliveros

  • Ways in which ICME sheaths differ from magnetosheaths

    G. Siscoe;D. Odstrcil

  • Wang‐Sheeley‐Arge–Enlil Cone Model Transitions to Operations

    Annette Parsons;Douglas Biesecker;Dusan Odstrcil;George Millward

  • MULTI-POINT SHOCK AND FLUX ROPE ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS AROUND 2010 AUGUST 1 IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE

    C. Mostl;C. Mostl;C. Mostl;Charlie J. Farrugia;E. K. J. Kilpua;L. K. Jian;L. K. Jian

  • Merging of coronal and heliospheric numerical two‐dimensional MHD models

    D. Odstrcil;J. A. Linker;R. Lionello;Z. Mikic

  • INFLUENCE OF THE AMBIENT SOLAR WIND FLOW ON THE PROPAGATION BEHAVIOR OF INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS

    Manuela Temmer;Tanja Rollett;Tanja Rollett;Christian Möstl;Christian Möstl;Astrid M. Veronig

  • Using an MHD simulation to interpret the global context of a coronal mass ejection observed by two spacecraft

    Pete Riley;J. A. Linker;Z. Mikić;D. Odstrcil

  • Propagation of an interplanetary shock along the heliospheric plasma sheet

    D. Odstrčil;M. Dryer;Z. Smith

  • Validation for solar wind prediction at Earth: Comparison of coronal and heliospheric models installed at the CCMC

    L. K. Jian;L. K. Jian;P. J. MacNeice;A. Taktakishvili;A. Taktakishvili;D. Odstrcil;D. Odstrcil

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet G. Luhmann
Janet G. Luhmann University of California, Berkeley
Jon A. Linker
Jon A. Linker Science Applications International Corporation (United States)
Sean C. Solomon
Sean C. Solomon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
James A. Slavin
James A. Slavin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Antti Pulkkinen
Antti Pulkkinen Goddard Space Flight Center
Stuart D. Bale
Stuart D. Bale University of California, Berkeley
Daniel N. Baker
Daniel N. Baker University of Colorado Boulder
Brian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Nathan A. Schwadron
Nathan A. Schwadron University of New Hampshire
Justin C. Kasper
Justin C. Kasper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and skill sets. Many find that selecting the easiest degree to get that still aligns with their interests provides a practical starting point, allowing for steady progress without undue stress.

Specializations like a geology degree online are particularly relevant. These programs integrate well with environmental studies by focusing on earth systems and natural resources, making graduates attractive to environmental consulting firms and government agencies.

Another complementary field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The best GIS programs in the US equip students with cutting-edge spatial analysis skills that are crucial for environmental monitoring and resource management careers.

For those interested in leadership roles or public sector careers, pursuing the best online masters in public administration can enhance understanding of policy and management, facilitating impactful roles in environmental regulation and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Dusan Odstrcil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles