World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 38 6373 5902 483 462 232 7192

Anne Socquet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne Socquet between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne Socquet published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2023. 24 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2023. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 3 publications
2002 2026

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne Socquet: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 4
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 5
2009 6
2010 10
2011 6
2012 8
2013 10
2014 12
2015 4
2016 13
2017 14
2018 11
2019 12
2020 11
2021 5
2022 14
2023 28
2024 25
2025 21
2026 3
Total 238
Download as CSV

Anne Socquet publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Socquet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 232 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262 232
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne Socquet D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Socquet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344 38
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anne Socquet is a researcher affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France, working primarily in the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research focuses extensively on geophysics, with significant contributions to earthquake and tectonic studies, as well as the application of artificial intelligence within geosciences.

Their body of work encompasses various specialized topics, including:

  • earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • GNSS positioning and interference
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis

Anne Socquet has published numerous papers in multiple scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Seismica

Notable recent publications include:

  • 3D GNSS Velocity Field Sheds Light on the Deformation Mechanisms in Europe: Effects of the Vertical Crustal Motion on the Distribution of Seismicity (2022), Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Rapid response to the M 4.9 earthquake of November 11, 2019 in Le Teil, Lower Rhône Valley, France (2021), Comptes Rendus Géoscience
  • Seismic Source Characterization From GNSS Data Using Deep Learning (2023), Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Localized Afterslip at Geometrical Complexities Revealed by InSAR After the 2016 Central Italy Seismic Sequence (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Relation Between Oceanic Plate Structure, Patterns of Interplate Locking and Microseismicity in the 1922 Atacama Seismic Gap (2023), Geophysical Research Letters

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • David Marsan
  • Mathilde Radiguet
  • Sophie Giffard-Roisin
  • Jannes Münchmeyer
  • Marcos Moreno

Anne Socquet's research integrates methodologies from geophysics and signal processing, and they have engaged with advanced computational approaches such as deep learning in seismology. Their work covers both observational and analytical aspects of seismic phenomena, contributing to understanding crustal deformation mechanisms and earthquake source characterization.

Best Publications

  • A decade of GPS in Southeast Asia: Resolving Sundaland motion and boundaries

    W. J. F. Simons;A. Socquet;A. Socquet;C. Vigny;B. A. C. Ambrosius

  • The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule megathrust earthquake of Central Chile, monitored by GPS.

    C. Vigny;A. Socquet;S. Peyrat;J. C. Ruegg

  • Insight into the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in southeast Asia

    C. Vigny;W. J. F. Simons;S. Abu;Ronnachai Bamphenyu

  • Present-day crustal deformation around Sagaing fault, Myanmar

    Christophe Vigny;Anne Socquet;Claude Rangin;Nicolas Chamot-Rooke

  • India and Sunda plates motion and deformation along their boundary in Myanmar determined by GPS

    Anne Socquet;Anne Socquet;Christophe Vigny;Nicolas Chamot-Rooke;Wim J. F. Simons

  • Toward understanding tectonic control on the Mw 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake

    Marcelo Spegiorin Moreno;Daniel Melnick;M. Rosenau;J. Baez

  • Microblock rotations and fault coupling in SE Asia triple junction (Sulawesi, Indonesia) from GPS and earthquake slip vector data

    Anne Socquet;Anne Socquet;Wim Simons;Christophe Vigny;Robert McCaffrey

  • Evidence of supershear during the 2018 magnitude 7.5 Palu earthquake from space geodesy

    Anne Socquet;James Hollingsworth;Erwan Pathier;Michel Bouchon

  • Cenozoic deformation in western Yunnan (China–Myanmar border)

    Anne Socquet;Anne Socquet;Manuel Pubellier

  • Interseismic coupling, segmentation and mechanical behavior of the central Chile subduction zone

    Marianne Métois;Anne Socquet;Christophe Vigny

  • Sequence of rifting in Afar, Manda-Hararo rift, Ethiopia, 2005–2009: Time-space evolution and interactions between dikes from interferometric synthetic aperture radar and static stress change modeling

    R. Grandin;R. Grandin;A. Socquet;E. Jacques;N. Mazzoni

  • Interseismic Coupling, Megathrust Earthquakes and Seismic Swarms Along the Chilean Subduction Zone (38°–18°S)

    Marianne Métois;Christophe Vigny;Anne Socquet

  • An 8 month slow slip event triggers progressive nucleation of the 2014 Chile megathrust

    Anne Socquet;Jesus Piña Valdes;Jorge Jara;Fabrice Cotton

  • September 2005 Manda Hararo‐Dabbahu rifting event, Afar (Ethiopia): Constraints provided by geodetic data

    R. Grandin;A. Socquet;R. Binet;Y. Klinger

  • Andean structural control on interseismic coupling in the North Chile subduction zone

    Marta Béjar-Pizarro;Anne Socquet;Rolando Armijo;Daniel Carrizo

  • Coseismic and postseismic slip associated with the 2010 Maule Earthquake, Chile: Characterizing the Arauco Peninsula barrier effect

    Yu Nung Nina Lin;Anthony Sladen;Francisco Ortega-Culaciati;Mark Simons

  • Large-scale InSAR monitoring of permafrost freeze-thaw cycles on the Tibetan Plateau

    Simon Daout;Marie-Pierre Doin;Gilles Peltzer;Gilles Peltzer;Anne Socquet

  • Revisiting the North Chile seismic gap segmentation using GPS-derived interseismic coupling

    Marianne Métois;Marianne Métois;A Socquet;C Vigny;D Carrizo

  • Coseismic slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake

    Fred F. Pollitz;Ben Brooks;Xiaopeng Tong;Michael G. Bevis

  • Large extensional aftershocks in the continental forearc triggered by the 2010 Maule earthquake, Chile

    Isabelle Ryder;Andreas Rietbrock;Keith Kelson;Roland Bürgmann

  • Insight into the 2004 Sumatra–Andamanearthquake from GPS measurements insoutheast Asia

    C Vigny;W J F Simons;S Abu;Ronnachai Bamphenyu

Frequent Co-Authors

Christophe Vigny
Christophe Vigny École Normale Supérieure
Raphaël Grandin
Raphaël Grandin Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Cécile Lasserre
Cécile Lasserre Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Rolando Armijo
Rolando Armijo Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Gilles Peltzer
Gilles Peltzer University of California, Los Angeles
Fabrice Cotton
Fabrice Cotton University of Potsdam
Mark Simons
Mark Simons California Institute of Technology
Marie-Pierre Doin
Marie-Pierre Doin Grenoble Alpes University
Yann Klinger
Yann Klinger Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Sergio Barrientos
Sergio Barrientos University of Chile

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their skills beyond Earth Science, exploring related online degree programs can open diverse career pathways. Fields like digital photography offer creative outlets that complement environmental studies, and many institutions provide affordable options to pursue an online digital photography degree. This can be especially valuable for documenting scientific research or working in environmental media.

Veterans looking to transition into civilian careers may find tailored programs that support their unique needs, such as online photography degree programs for veterans. These offerings often include flexibility and financial aid, making it easier to gain new skills while managing other commitments.

Language skills are another valuable asset in Earth Science careers, particularly in global research and communication. Pursuing a spanish online degree can enhance job prospects in diverse sectors like conservation, education, and government agencies.

Veterans interested in language studies can also explore the best online spanish degree programs for veterans, which offer specialized support to build proficiency while accommodating military schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Socquet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles