World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anthony P. H. Wright

Anthony P. H. Wright

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 47 2756 2500 36 31 92 7399

Anthony P. H. Wright publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony P. H. Wright between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony P. H. Wright published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2000. 3 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2000. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1985 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony P. H. Wright: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 4
1992 5
1993 3
1994 4
1995 5
1996 2
1997 5
1998 2
1999 5
2000 6
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 0
2009 3
2010 5
2011 1
2012 0
2013 3
2014 1
2015 1
2016 3
2017 3
2018 4
2019 2
2020 3
2021 4
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 104
Download as CSV

Anthony P. H. Wright publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony P. H. Wright sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 92 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125 92
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony P. H. Wright D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony P. H. Wright sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 47
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Anthony P. H. Wright is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their scholarly work addresses a range of topics reflecting intersections between oncology, molecular biology, and immunology. Key research areas include:

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Their publication record comprises numerous articles published in a variety of scientific journals, with frequent contributions to venues such as the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Cancers, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Pancreatology, and Frontiers in Neuroscience. Notable recent papers include:

  • Disentangling the Amyloid Pathways: A Mechanistic Approach to Etiology (2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience)
  • 3D heterospecies spheroids of pancreatic stroma and cancer cells demonstrate key phenotypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2021, Translational Oncology)
  • Intrinsic 5-lipoxygenase activity regulates migration and adherence of mantle cell lymphoma cells (2021, Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators)
  • Differential B-Cell Receptor Signaling Requirement for Adhesion of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells to Stromal Cells (2020, Cancers)
  • Migration and Adhesion of B-Lymphocytes to Specific Microenvironments in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Interplay between Signaling Pathways and the Epigenetic Landscape (2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

Anthony Wright has collaborated with several recurring co-authors throughout their career. Frequent collaborators include Laia Sadeghi, Gustav Arvidsson, Magali Merrien, Birgitta Sander, and Matthias Löhr.

Best Publications

  • c-Myc associates with ribosomal DNA and activates RNA polymerase I transcription.

    Azadeh Arabi;Azadeh Arabi;Siqin Wu;Karin Ridderstråle;Holger Bierhoff

  • Activation functions 1 and 2 of nuclear receptors: molecular strategies for transcriptional activation.

    Anette Wärnmark;Eckardt Treuter;Anthony P.H. Wright;Jan Åke Gustafsson

  • Activation Domain–Mediated Targeting of the SWI/SNF Complex to Promoters Stimulates Transcription from Nucleosome Arrays

    Kristen E Neely;Ahmed H Hassan;Annika E Wallberg;David J Steger

  • IDENTIFICATION AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL MITOCHONDRIAL THIOREDOXIN SYSTEM IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

    José R. Pedrajas;Effie Kosmidou;Antonio Miranda-Vizuete;Jan-Åke Gustafsson

  • Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain with DNA as a dimer is mediated by a short segment of five amino acids.

    Karin Dahlman-Wright;Anthony Wright;Jan-Ake Gustafsson;Jan Carlstedt-Duke

  • Structural determinants of DNA-binding specificity by steroid receptors.

    Johanna Zilliacus;Anthony P. H. Wright;Jan Carlstedt-Duke;Jan-Ake Gustafsson

  • Mechanism of gene expression by the glucocorticoid receptor: Role of protein-protein interactions

    Iain J. McEwan;Anthony P. H. Wright;Jan‐Åke Gustafsson

  • Structural characterization of a minimal functional transactivation domain from the human glucocorticoid receptor.

    Karin Dahlman-Wright;Herbert Baumann;Iain J. McEwan;Tova Almlof

  • Dicer is required for chromosome segregation and gene silencing in fission yeast cells

    Patrick Provost;Rebecca A. Silverstein;David Dishart;Julian Walfridsson

  • myc Boxes, Which Are Conserved in myc Family Proteins, Are Signals for Protein Degradation via the Proteasome

    Elizabeth M. Flinn;C. Magnus C. Busch;Anthony P. H. Wright

  • The N-terminal regions of estrogen receptor alpha and beta are unstructured in vitro and show different TBP binding properties.

    Anette Wärnmark;Anja Wikström;Anja Wikström;Anthony P.H. Wright;Anthony P.H. Wright;Jan Åke Gustafsson

  • Recruitment of the SWI-SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complex as a Mechanism of Gene Activation by the Glucocorticoid Receptor τ1 Activation Domain

    Annika E. Wallberg;Kristen E. Neely;Ahmed H. Hassan;Jan-Åke Gustafsson

  • FUNCTIONAL INTERACTION OF THE C-MYC TRANSACTIVATION DOMAIN WITH THE TATA BINDING PROTEIN : EVIDENCE FOR AN INDUCED FIT MODEL OF TRANSACTIVATION DOMAIN FOLDING

    Iain J. McEwan;Karin Dahlman-Wright;Jacqueline Ford;Anthony P. H. Wright

  • Role of Acidic and Phosphorylated Residues in Gene Activation by the Glucocorticoid Receptor

    Tova Almlöf;Anthony P.H. Wright;Jan-Åke Gustafsson

  • Refined solution structure of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain.

    H. Baumann;K. Paulsen;H. Kovacs;H. Berglund

  • Vectors for the construction of gene banks and the integration of cloned genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Wright A;Maundrell K;Heyer Wd;Beach D

  • Structure and function of the glucocorticoid receptor

    Anthony P.H. Wright;Johanna Zilliacus;Iain J. McEwan;Karin Dahlman-Wright

  • Interaction of the ligand-activated glucocorticoid receptor with the 14- 3-3η protein

    Hideki Wakui;Anthony P.H. Wright;Jan-Åke Gustafsson;Johanna Zilliacus

  • Delineation of a small region within the major transactivation domain of the human glucocorticoid receptor that mediates transactivation of gene expression.

    Karin Dahlman-Wright;Tova Almlöf;Iain J. Mcewan;Jan Åke Gustafsson

  • Accumulation of c-Myc and proteasomes at the nucleoli of cells containing elevated c-Myc protein levels.

    Azadeh Arabi;Cecilia Rustum;Einar Hallberg;Anthony P. H. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan-Åke Gustafsson
Jan-Åke Gustafsson University of Houston
Jan Carlstedt-Duke
Jan Carlstedt-Duke Nanyang Technological University
Karin Dahlman-Wright
Karin Dahlman-Wright Karolinska Institute
Jerry L. Workman
Jerry L. Workman Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Karl Ekwall
Karl Ekwall Karolinska Institute
Torleif Härd
Torleif Härd Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Lennart Nilsson
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institute
Samir El Andaloussi
Samir El Andaloussi Karolinska Institute
Susanne Åkesson
Susanne Åkesson Lund University
Staffan Bensch
Staffan Bensch Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their careers beyond molecular biology, a range of related online degrees and pathways are available. Many students explore healthcare and nursing programs, which build on scientific foundations and offer strong job prospects in the USA.

If you’re considering a transition to nursing from a science background, direct entry msn online programs allow non-nurses to earn a master’s degree efficiently. For registered nurses looking to boost their qualifications, comparing options like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can help you select the best degree based on flexibility, cost, and reputation.

Budget-conscious students may be interested in finding the cheapest bsn to msn online programs, which can significantly reduce tuition expenses while opening doors to advanced roles. It’s also wise to consider accredited, reputable institutions. Choosing a non profit university often ensures higher standards and better student outcomes.

Whether you aim for laboratory research, clinical practice, or teaching, these online degree pathways provide a flexible, affordable way to build on your molecular biology background and expand your career options.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony P. H. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles