World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 34 7860 7284 627 600 157 5568

Cécile Lasserre publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cécile Lasserre between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cécile Lasserre published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 12 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 9 publications
1999 2025

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cécile Lasserre: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 6
2009 5
2010 11
2011 8
2012 8
2013 8
2014 11
2015 10
2016 10
2017 9
2018 8
2019 15
2020 2
2021 22
2022 7
2023 4
2024 3
2025 9
Total 180
Download as CSV

Cécile Lasserre publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Lasserre sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 157 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495 157
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Cécile Lasserre D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Lasserre sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366 34
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cécile Lasserre is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Engineering, with a specific focus on geophysical processes.

The scientist's work extensively covers subfields including Geophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Oceanography, and Atmospheric Science. Their research engages several key topics such as earthquake and tectonic studies, earthquake detection and analysis, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) applications and techniques, soil moisture and remote sensing, geological and geochemical analysis, GNSS positioning and interference, and cryospheric studies and observations.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cécile Lasserre include Marianne Métois, Raphaël Grandin, Romain Jolivet, Stéphane Baize, and Léo Marconato. Their research has been published in multiple venues, with notable recurrent contributions to Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Geophysical Journal International, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, Comptes Rendus Géoscience, and Tectonophysics.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Cécile Lasserre include:

  • "CorPhU: an algorithm based on phase closure for the correction of unwrapping errors in SAR interferometry" (2020), Geophysical Journal International
  • "Rapid response to the M 4.9 earthquake of November 11, 2019 in Le Teil, Lower Rhône Valley, France" (2021), Comptes Rendus Géoscience
  • "The 2019 Mw 5.8 Changning, China earthquake: A cascade rupture of fold-accommodation faults induced by fluid injection" (2021), Tectonophysics
  • "FLATSIM: The ForM@Ter LArge-Scale Multi-Temporal Sentinel-1 InterferoMetry Service" (2021), Remote Sensing
  • "Subsidence associated with oil extraction, measured from time series analysis of Sentinel-1 data: case study of the Patos-Marinza oil field, Albania" (2020), Solid Earth

Best Publications

  • Corrections of stratified tropospheric delays in SAR interferometry: Validation with global atmospheric models

    M.-P. Doin;Cécile Lasserre;G. Peltzer;O. Cavalié

  • Systematic InSAR tropospheric phase delay corrections from global meteorological reanalysis data

    Romain Jolivet;Raphael Grandin;Cécile Lasserre;Marie-Pierre Doin

  • High-Resolution Satellite Imagery Mapping of the Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the Mw ∼7.8, 14 November 2001 Kokoxili Earthquake, Kunlun Fault, Northern Tibet, China

    Yann Klinger;Xiwei Xu;Paul Tapponnier;Jerome Van der Woerd

  • Shallow creep on the Haiyuan Fault (Gansu, China) revealed by SAR Interferometry

    R. Jolivet;R. Jolivet;C. Lasserre;M.-P. Doin;S. Guillaso

  • Measurement of interseismic strain across the Haiyuan fault (Gansu, China), by InSAR

    O. Cavalié;Cécile Lasserre;M.-P. Doin;G. Peltzer;G. Peltzer

  • Coseismic deformation of the 2001 Mw = 7.8 Kokoxili earthquake in Tibet, measured by synthetic aperture radar interferometry

    C. Lasserre;C. Lasserre;G. Peltzer;G. Peltzer;F. Crampé;Y Klinger

  • Ground motion measurement in the Lake Mead area, Nevada, by differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry time series analysis: Probing the lithosphere rheological structure

    O. Cavalié;M.-P. Doin;C. Lasserre;P. Briole

  • Fast late Pleistocene slip rate on the Leng Long Ling segment of the Haiyuan fault, Qinghai, China

    C. Lasserre;C. Lasserre;Y. Gaudemer;P. Tapponnier;A.-S. Mériaux

  • Postglacial left slip rate and past occurrence of M≥8 earthquakes on the Western Haiyuan Fault, Gansu, China

    Cecile Lasserre;Paul-Henri Morel;Yves Gaudemer;Paul Tapponnier

  • Presentation Of The Small Baseline NSBAS Processing Chain On A Case Example: The ETNA Deformation Monitoring From 2003 to 2010 Using ENVISAT Data

    Marie-Pierre Doin;Felicity Lodge;Stephane Guillaso;Romain Jolivet

  • September 2005 Manda Hararo‐Dabbahu rifting event, Afar (Ethiopia): Constraints provided by geodetic data

    R. Grandin;A. Socquet;R. Binet;Y. Klinger

  • Large-scale InSAR monitoring of permafrost freeze-thaw cycles on the Tibetan Plateau

    Simon Daout;Marie-Pierre Doin;Gilles Peltzer;Gilles Peltzer;Anne Socquet

  • Millennial Recurrence of Large Earthquakes on the Haiyuan Fault near Songshan, Gansu Province, China

    Jing Liu-Zeng;Jing Liu-Zeng;Yann Klinger;Xiwei Xu;Cécile Lasserre

  • New Radar Interferometric Time Series Analysis Toolbox Released

    Piyush Agram;Romain Jolivet;Bryan Riel;Yu-Nung Nina Lin

  • Spatio-temporal evolution of aseismic slip along the Haiyuan fault, China: Implications for fault frictional properties

    R. Jolivet;C. Lasserre;M.-P. Doin;G. Peltzer;G. Peltzer

  • Long-term slip rates and characteristic slip: keys to active fault behaviour and earthquake hazard

    Paul Tapponnier;Frederick James Ryerson;Jerome Van der Woerd;Jerome Van der Woerd;Anne-Sophie Mériaux;Anne-Sophie Mériaux

  • Kinematics of the North American-Caribbean-Cocos plates in Central America from new GPS measurements across the Polochic-Motagua fault system

    H. Lyon-Caen;E. Barrier;C. Lasserre;A. Franco

  • Unsupervised Spatiotemporal Mining of Satellite Image Time Series Using Grouped Frequent Sequential Patterns

    Andreea Julea;Nicolas Méger;Philippe Bolon;Christophe Rigotti

  • Thin-plate modeling of interseismic deformation and asymmetry across the Altyn Tagh fault zone

    R. Jolivet;R. Cattin;N. Chamot-Rooke;C. Lasserre

  • Fault kinematics in northern Central America and coupling along the subduction interface of the Cocos Plate, from GPS data in Chiapas (Mexico), Guatemala and El Salvador

    Aurore Franco;Cécile Lasserre;H. Lyon-Caen;Vladimir Kostoglodov

  • An aseismic slip transient on the North Anatolian Fault

    Baptiste Rousset;Romain Jolivet;Mark Simons;Cécile Lasserre

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilles Peltzer
Gilles Peltzer University of California, Los Angeles
Marie-Pierre Doin
Marie-Pierre Doin Grenoble Alpes University
Romain Jolivet
Romain Jolivet École Normale Supérieure
François Renard
François Renard University of Oslo
Paul Tapponnier
Paul Tapponnier China Earthquake Administration
Xiwei Xu
Xiwei Xu Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Anne Socquet
Anne Socquet Grenoble Alpes University
Ziyadin Cakir
Ziyadin Cakir Istanbul Technical University
Vladimir Kostoglodov
Vladimir Kostoglodov National Autonomous University of Mexico
Michel Campillo
Michel Campillo Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that can complement your career prospects. For those interested in combining analytical skills with creative expression, online options like photography degrees online offer affordable pathways to master visual documentation techniques. This can be particularly useful in environmental monitoring and geospatial studies.

Military veterans seeking to advance their knowledge may find specially tailored programs such as online photography degree for military veterans a valuable resource. These veteran-friendly programs provide flexible learning schedules and support services designed to ease the transition to civilian careers in science and technology.

Language skills are also highly beneficial for Earth Science professionals working in global contexts. Pursuing the cheapest online spanish degree allows you to gain language proficiency affordably, enhancing communication with Spanish-speaking colleagues and communities impacted by environmental issues.

For veterans aiming to specialize further, programs focused on the best military friendly online spanish degrees provide supportive environments and tailored resources, ensuring a smooth academic experience while expanding professional opportunities in international earth science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Cécile Lasserre

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles