World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
91
Citations
46813
World Ranking
2273
National Ranking
1218

David J. Glass publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Glass sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 261 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David J. Glass D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Glass sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Glass is affiliated with Regeneron in the United States and specializes in research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Physiology, Epidemiology, Rheumatology, and Immunology.

The scientist has contributed to a range of topics predominantly focused on Muscle Physiology and Disorders, Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, Nutrition and Health in Aging, GDF15 and Related Biomarkers, Autophagy in Disease and Therapy, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by David J. Glass are:

  • Common and rare variant associations with clonal haematopoiesis phenotypes (2022, Nature)
  • Protein signatures of centenarians and their offspring suggest centenarians age slower than other humans (2021, Aging Cell)
  • ARDD 2020: from aging mechanisms to interventions (2020, Aging)
  • The prevalence of low muscle mass associated with obesity in the USA (2022, Skeletal Muscle)
  • Dual roles of mTORC1-dependent activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in muscle proteostasis (2022, Communications Biology)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature, Skeletal Muscle, UNC Libraries, and Aging.

David J. Glass has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including Gurinder S. Atwal, Tea Shavlakadze, Alan R. Shuldiner, John D. Overton, and Aris Baras, with multiple joint publications recorded.

Best Publications

  • Identification of Ubiquitin Ligases Required for Skeletal Muscle Atrophy

    Sue C. Bodine;Esther Latres;Susanne Baumhueter;Venus K.-M. Lai

  • Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo.

    Sue C. Bodine;Trevor N. Stitt;Michael Gonzalez;William O. Kline

  • The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt Pathway Prevents Expression of Muscle Atrophy-Induced Ubiquitin Ligases by Inhibiting FOXO Transcription Factors

    Trevor N. Stitt;Doreen Drujan;Brian A. Clarke;Frank Panaro

  • Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways

    Christian Rommel;Sue C. Bodine;Brian A. Clarke;Roni Rossman

  • IKKβ/NF-κB Activation Causes Severe Muscle Wasting in Mice

    Dongsheng Cai;J. Daniel Frantz;J. Daniel Frantz;Nicholas E. Tawa;Nicholas E. Tawa;Peter A. Melendez;Peter A. Melendez

  • Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy signaling pathways.

    David J. Glass

  • Cancer cachexia: mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways.

    Kenneth C.H. Fearon;David J. Glass;Denis C. Guttridge

  • The Receptor Tyrosine Kinase MuSK Is Required for Neuromuscular Junction Formation In Vivo

    Thomas M DeChiara;David C Bowen;David M Valenzuela;Mary V Simmons

  • Differentiation Stage-Specific Inhibition of the Raf-MEK-ERK Pathway by Akt

    Christian Rommel;Brian A. Clarke;Sven Zimmermann;Lorna Nuñez

  • trkB encodes a functional receptor for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 but not nerve growth factor

    Stephen P. Squinto;Trevor N. Stitt;Thomas H. Aldrich;Samuel Davis

  • The anticoagulation factor protein S and its relative, Gas6, are ligands for the Tyro 3/Axl family of receptor tyrosine kinases

    Trevor N Stitt;Greg Conn;Martin Goret;Martin Goret;Cary Lai

  • Signalling pathways that mediate skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy

    David J. Glass

  • Myostatin reduces Akt/TORC1/p70S6K signaling, inhibiting myoblast differentiation and myotube size

    Anne Ulrike Trendelenburg;Angelika Meyer;Daisy Rohner;Joseph Boyle

  • Agrin Acts via a MuSK Receptor Complex

    David J Glass;David C Bowen;Trevor N Stitt;Czeslaw Radziejewski

  • mTOR inhibition improves immune function in the elderly

    Joan B. Mannick;Giuseppe Del Giudice;Maria Lattanzi;Nicholas M. Valiante

  • The E3 Ligase MuRF1 degrades myosin heavy chain protein in dexamethasone-treated skeletal muscle.

    Brian A. Clarke;Doreen Drujan;Monte S. Willis;Leon O. Murphy

  • During muscle atrophy, thick, but not thin, filament components are degraded by MuRF1-dependent ubiquitylation

    Shenhav Orit Cohen;Jeffrey J. Brault;Steven P. Gygi;David Jonathan Glass

  • Similarities and differences in the way neurotrophins interact with the Trk receptors in neuronal and nonneuronal cells.

    Nancy Y. Ip;Trevor N. Stitt;Peter Tapley;Rudiger Klein

  • An orphan receptor tyrosine kinase family whose members serve as nonintegrin collagen receptors

    Ajay Shrivastava;Czeslaw Radziejewski;Ernest Campbell;Lubomir Kovac

  • Short Article The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt Pathway Prevents Expression of Muscle Atrophy-Induced Ubiquitin Ligases by Inhibiting FOXO Transcription Factors

    Trevor N. Stitt;Doreen Drujan;Brian A. Clarke;Frank Panaro

Frequent Co-Authors

George D. Yancopoulos
George D. Yancopoulos Regeneron (United States)
Michael C. Milone
Michael C. Milone University of Pennsylvania
Ronenn Roubenoff
Ronenn Roubenoff Novartis (Switzerland)
Peter H. Schur
Peter H. Schur Brigham and Women's Hospital
David L. Porter
David L. Porter University of Pennsylvania
Nancy Y. Ip
Nancy Y. Ip Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
David M. Valenzuela
David M. Valenzuela Regeneron (United States)
Joshua R. Sanes
Joshua R. Sanes Harvard University
Carl H. June
Carl H. June University of Pennsylvania
Susan T. Lovett
Susan T. Lovett Brandeis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a range of in-demand careers, many of which now offer online study options. As the healthcare industry continues to grow, so do opportunities in areas such as medical coding, health information management, and nutrition science.

For those interested in merging science and technology, medical coding offers a stable career with competitive pay. If you are curious about potential earnings, learn more about medical coder salary and see if it matches your goals. Another common question is: is medical billing and coding a good career? This guide can help you weigh the pros and cons.

Beyond coding, those hoping to advance in data and healthcare systems can now complete an accredited him degree entirely online. If food science and wellness are your passion, explore an online masters degree in nutrition to become a specialist in this rapidly evolving field.

Online programs offer flexibility for working professionals and those with demanding schedules, making it easier than ever to launch or advance your career in healthcare and the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Glass

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles