World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17979 16899 8960 8282 564 24423

Ian T. Meredith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian T. Meredith between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian T. Meredith published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2015. 2 of the 586 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2015. 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 51 publications 2013: 46 publications 2014: 43 publications 2015: 55 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 43 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1990 2025

586 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian T. Meredith: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 4
1991 6
1992 3
1993 6
1994 2
1995 3
1996 4
1997 4
1998 5
1999 7
2000 11
2001 8
2002 8
2003 14
2004 9
2005 2
2006 5
2007 26
2008 26
2009 39
2010 31
2011 34
2012 51
2013 46
2014 43
2015 55
2016 40
2017 43
2018 21
2019 15
2020 6
2021 4
2022 3
2023 0
2024 0
2025 2
Total 586
Download as CSV

Ian T. Meredith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian T. Meredith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 564 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 564
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian T. Meredith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian T. Meredith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian T. Meredith is a researcher affiliated with Boston Scientific in the United States, with a focus on the field of Medicine. Their work largely centers on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine as well as Surgery, with additional research contributions in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Genetics.

Their research addresses several key topics including Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches, Peripheral Artery Disease Management, and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics.

Significant recent publications by Ian T. Meredith include the following:

  • Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Primary Results of the EVOLVE Short DAPT Study, 2021, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Insights on Embolic Protection, Repositioning, and Stroke: A Subanalysis of the RESPOND Study, 2020, Journal of Interventional Cardiology
  • Does study subject diversity influence cardiology research site performance?: Insights from 2 U.S. National Coronary Stent Registries, 2021, American Heart Journal
  • SAFETY OF ABBREVIATED DAPT IN HIGH BLEEDING RISK PATIENTS ON ANTICOAGULANTS OR AGE ≥75 YEARS AFTER PCI WITH THE SYNERGY STENT: A SUBGROUP ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLVE SHORT DAPT STUDY, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Their most frequent publication venues illustrate a concentration in journals related to cardiovascular and cardiology research, including:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiology
  • American Heart Journal

Frequent collaborators in Ian T. Meredith's work include Dominic J. Allocco, Robert Stoler, Robert Feldman, Loukas Boutis, and Naeem Tahirkheli, indicating collaborative research efforts with experts in related cardiovascular and interventional fields.

Best Publications

  • Close relation of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations

    Todd J. Anderson;Akimi Uehata;Marie D. Gerhard;Ian T. Meredith

  • The Effect of Cholesterol-Lowering and Antioxidant Therapy on Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion

    Todd J. Anderson;Ian T. Meredith;Alan C. Yeung;Balz Frei

  • Overflow of catecholamine neurotransmitters to the circulation: source, fate, and functions

    M Esler;G Jennings;G Lambert;I Meredith

  • Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes

    Patrick W. Serruys;Yoshinobu Onuma;Dariusz Dudek;Pieter C. Smits

  • Air versus oxygen in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction

    Dion Ashley Stub;Karen Louise Smith;Stephen Anthony Bernard;Ziad Nehme

  • Systemic nature of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis.

    Todd J. Anderson;Marie D. Gerhard;Ian T. Meredith;François Charbonneau

  • Evidence of a Selective Increase in Cardiac Sympathetic Activity in Patients with Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias

    Ian T. Meredith;Archer Broughton;Garry L. Jennings;Murray D. Esler

  • Postischemic vasodilation in human forearm is dependent on endothelium-derived nitric oxide

    I. T. Meredith;K. E. Currie;T. J. Anderson;M. A. Roddy

  • Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus Drug-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery StenosisClinical Perspective

    Patrick W. Serruys;Yoshinobu Onuma;John A. Ormiston;Bernard de Bruyne

  • Early Endothelial Dysfunction Predicts the Development of Transplant Coronary Artery Disease at 1 Year Posttransplant

    Stacy F. Davis;Alan C. Yeung;Ian T. Meredith;François Charbonneau

  • Feasibility of Shockwave Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Stenoses.

    Todd J. Brinton;Ziad A. Ali;Jonathan M. Hill;Ian T. Meredith

  • Cardiac sympathetic nervous activity in congestive heart failure. Evidence for increased neuronal norepinephrine release and preserved neuronal uptake.

    I T Meredith;G Eisenhofer;G W Lambert;E M Dewar

  • Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Patrick W. Serruys;Yoshinobu Onuma;Hector M. Garcia-Garcia;Takashi Muramatsu

  • Exercise training lowers resting renal but not cardiac sympathetic activity in humans.

    I T Meredith;P Friberg;G L Jennings;E M Dewar

  • A prospective, randomized evaluation of a novel everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the PLATINUM (a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial to Assess an Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System [PROMUS Element] for the Treatment of Up to Two de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions) trial.

    Gregg W. Stone;Paul S. Teirstein;Ian T. Meredith;Bruno Farah

  • First Serial Assessment at 6 Months and 2 Years of the Second Generation of Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold A Multi-Imaging Modality Study

    John A Ormiston;Patrick W Serruys;Yoshinobu Onuma;Robert-Jan van Geuns

  • Primary Endpoint Results of the EVOLVE Trial: A Randomized Evaluation of a Novel Bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated, Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent

    Ian T. Meredith;Stefan Verheye;Christophe L. Dubois;Joseph Dens

  • Epicardial adipose tissue: far more than a fat depot

    Andrew H. Talman;Peter J. Psaltis;James D. Cameron;Ian T. Meredith

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Characterization of Coronary Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Lesions: First Description

    Ziad A. Ali;Todd J. Brinton;Jonathan M. Hill;Akiko Maehara

  • Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice: comprehensive network meta-analysis

    Eliano Pio Navarese;Kenneth Tandjung;Bimmer Claessen;Felicita Andreotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Garry L. Jennings
Garry L. Jennings University of Sydney
Murray D. Esler
Murray D. Esler Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Helen Cox
Helen Cox University of Cape Town
Anthony M. Dart
Anthony M. Dart Monash University
Bronwyn A. Kingwell
Bronwyn A. Kingwell Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
David M. Kaye
David M. Kaye The Alfred Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine extends beyond becoming a doctor. Several online adn programs offer students a flexible route to enter the nursing field. These associate degree programs prepare graduates for entry-level nursing positions while allowing them to study from home.

If you're interested in healthcare administration, an online healthcare administration degree can open doors to leadership and management roles within hospitals and clinics. These accelerated programs are designed for those eager to move up in the healthcare industry without years on campus.

Not all healthcare paths require direct patient care. Careers in health information, such as medical billing and coding, are also in high demand. Many choose accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to quickly gain credentials and secure employment.

For aspiring nurses worried about standardized tests, some schools no longer mandate the TEAS or HESI exam. To learn more about whether you need to take the TEAS test for LPN admission, visit do i need to take the teas test for lpn.

Best Scientists Citing Ian T. Meredith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles