World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9111 8513 397 383 94 7194

Sanne de Wit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sanne de Wit between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sanne de Wit published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2023. 10 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2023. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sanne de Wit: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 3
2010 3
2011 4
2012 4
2013 6
2014 6
2015 4
2016 10
2017 7
2018 9
2019 1
2020 4
2021 15
2022 8
2023 16
2024 6
2025 4
Total 116
Download as CSV

Sanne de Wit publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanne de Wit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sanne de Wit D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanne de Wit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sanne de Wit is a researcher affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their work centers primarily on psychology, contributing to the field through a focus on applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, health, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

Their research involves several main topics, including behavioral health and interventions, health disparities and outcomes, mental health research topics, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, neural and behavioral psychology studies, aging and gerontology research, and eating disorders and behaviors.

The researcher has published in multiple academic venues with some frequency, including:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Behavior Research Methods

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sanne de Wit include Lotte P. Brinkhof, Jaap M. J. Murre, K. Richard Ridderinkhof, Harm J. Krugers, and Tim van Timmeren.

Recent papers reflect diverse research interests with emphasis on behavior and psychological constructs:

  • What is habit and how can it be used to change real-world behaviour? Narrowing the theory-reality gap (2024, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)
  • The Interplay Between Quality of Life and Resilience Factors in Later Life: A Network Analysis (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ) (2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Investigating habits in humans with a symmetrical outcome-revaluation task (2022, Behavior Research Methods)
  • Promoting physical distancing during COVID-19: a systematic approach to compare behavioral interventions (2021, Scientific Reports)

The scope of their work suggests involvement in interdisciplinary areas touching on psychological health, aging, and behavioral interventions, with a considerable body of publications addressing real-world behavior change and psychological assessments.

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: towards dimensional psychiatry

    Trevor W. Robbins;Claire M. Gillan;Dana G. Smith;Sanne de Wit

  • Disruption in the balance between goal-directed behavior and habit learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Claire M. Gillan;Martina Papmeyer;Sharon Morein-Zamir;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: a case for animal-human translational models.

    Sanne de Wit;Anthony Dickinson

  • Corticostriatal Connectivity Underlies Individual Differences in the Balance between Habitual and Goal-Directed Action Control

    Sanne de Wit;Poppy Watson;Helga A Harsay;Michael X Cohen

  • Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective.

    George Aalbers;Richard J. McNally;Alexandre Heeren;Sanne de Wit

  • Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for overreliance on habit learning in alcohol-dependent patients

    Z. Sjoerds;Z. Sjoerds;S. de Wit;W. van den Brink;T.W. Robbins

  • Behavioral and neuroanatomical characterization of the Fmr1 knockout mouse.

    Yann S. Mineur;Yann S. Mineur;Frans Sluyter;Sanne de Wit;Ben A. Oostra

  • Carrots and sticks fail to change behavior in cocaine addiction.

    Karen D. Ersche;Claire M. Gillan;Claire M. Gillan;P. Simon Jones;Guy B. Williams

  • Differential engagement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex by goal-directed and habitual behavior toward food pictures in humans

    Sanne de Wit;Philip R Corlett;Michael Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

  • Shifting the balance between goals and habits: Five failures in experimental habit induction.

    Sanne de Wit;Merel Kindt;Sarah L. Knot;Aukje A. C. Verhoeven

  • Working for food you don't desire. Cues interfere with goal-directed food-seeking

    P. Watson;R.W. Wiers;B. Hommel;S. de Wit

  • Enhanced habit formation in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

    Cécile Delorme;Alexandre Salvador;Alexandre Salvador;Romain Valabrègue;Emmanuel Roze

  • Reliance on habits at the expense of goal-directed control following dopamine precursor depletion

    Sanne de Wit;Sanne de Wit;Holly R. Standing;Elise E. DeVito;Elise E. DeVito;Oliver J. Robinson;Oliver J. Robinson

  • Habitual versus goal-directed action control in parkinson disease

    Sanne de Wit;Roger A. Barker;Anthony D. Dickinson;Roshan Cools

  • Stimulus-outcome interactions during instrumental discrimination learning by rats and humans.

    S. de Wit;D. Niry;R. Wariyar;M. R. F. Aitken

  • Current limits of experimental research into habits and future directions

    Unknown

  • Motivational mechanisms and outcome expectancies underlying the approach bias toward addictive substances

    P. Watson;S. de Wit;Bernhard Hommel;R. W. Wiers

  • Neurocognitive and Clinical Predictors of Long-Term Outcome in Adolescents at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: A 6-Year Follow-Up

    Tim Ziermans;Sanne de Wit;Patricia Schothorst;Mirjam Sprong

  • Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex Resolves Response Conflict in Rats

    Sanne de Wit;Yutaka Kosaki;Bernard Walter Balleine;Anthony Dickinson

  • Distinct Modulatory Effects of Satiety and Sibutramine on Brain Responses to Food Images in Humans: A Double Dissociation across Hypothalamus, Amygdala, and Ventral Striatum

    P.C. Fletcher;A. Napolitano;A. Skeggs;S.R. Miller

  • Ketamine administration in healthy volunteers reproduces aberrant agency experiences associated with schizophrenia

    James W. Moore;Danielle C. Turner;Philip R. Corlett;Philip R. Corlett;Fernando S. Arana;Fernando S. Arana

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Claire M. Gillan
Claire M. Gillan Trinity College Dublin
Anthony Dickinson
Anthony Dickinson University of Cambridge
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge
Annette Horstmann
Annette Horstmann University of Helsinki
Herman van Engeland
Herman van Engeland Utrecht University
Sarah Durston
Sarah Durston Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to diverse online programs and rewarding career paths in counseling and mental health. As the demand for licensed professionals grows, many students pursue specialized master’s degrees to meet state licensure requirements and launch careers as counselors.

Each state features distinct guidelines for becoming an LPC (Licensed Professional Counselor). For example, Arkansas licensed professional counselor requirements emphasize both graduate coursework and supervised experience, highlighting the value of accredited online study. If you’re interested in the West Coast, learn how to get an lpc license in California—a state known for its rigorous educational and practical mandates.

Other regions feature their own standards. Understanding Colorado licensed professional counselor requirements or researching Connecticut lpc licensure requirements can help you choose the best online degree and state for your professional ambitions. Ultimately, selecting the right program will position you to succeed in counseling, therapy, and related psychology careers nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Sanne de Wit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles