World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
22636
World Ranking
17148
National Ranking
235

Jose R. Arribas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose R. Arribas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 462 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jose R. Arribas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose R. Arribas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Circulating microRNAs in sera correlate with soluble biomarkers of immune activation but do not predict mortality in ART treated individuals with HIV-1 infection : a case control study

    Daniel D. Murray;Kazuo Suzuki;Matthew Law;Jonel Trebicka

  • Tenofovir DF, Emtricitabine, and Efavirenz vs. Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and Efavirenz for HIV

    Joel E. Gallant;Edwin Dejesus;José R. Arribas;Anton L. Pozniak

  • Lopinavir–Ritonavir versus Nelfinavir for the Initial Treatment of HIV Infection

    Sharon Walmsley;Barry Bernstein;Martin King;José Arribas

  • Comparison of Changes in Bone Density and Turnover with Abacavir-Lamivudine versus Tenofovir-Emtricitabine in HIV-Infected Adults: 48-Week Results from the ASSERT Study

    Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink;Chloe Orkin;Jose Ramon Arribas;Juliet Compston

  • Dolutegravir in Antiretroviral-Experienced Patients With Raltegravir- and/or Elvitegravir-Resistant HIV-1: 24-Week Results of the Phase III VIKING-3 Study

    Antonella Castagna;Franco Maggiolo;Giovanni Penco;David Wright

  • Clinical Management of Ebola Virus Disease in the United States and Europe.

    Timothy M. Uyeki;Aneesh K. Mehta;Richard T. Davey;Allison M. Liddell

  • Once daily dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV: planned interim 48 week results from SPRING-1, a dose-ranging, randomised, phase 2b trial

    Jan van Lunzen;Franco Maggiolo;José R Arribas;Aza Rakhmanova

  • Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in antiretroviral regimens for virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 infection: a randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study

    Anthony Mills;Jose R. Arribas;Jaime Andrade-Villanueva;Giovanni DiPerri

  • Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in ChAdOx1-S-primed participants (CombiVacS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

    Alberto M Borobia;Antonio J Carcas;Mayte Pérez-Olmeda;Luis Castaño

  • Incidence and Severity of COVID-19 in HIV-Positive Persons Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy : A Cohort Study.

    Julia Del Amo;Rosa Polo;Santiago Moreno;Asunción Díaz

  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz compared with zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients: 144-week analysis.

    Jose R. Arribas;Anton L. Pozniak;Joel E. Gallant;Edwin DeJesus

  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz versus fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive patients: virologic, immunologic, and morphologic changes--a 96-week analysis.

    Anton L. Pozniak;Joel E. Gallant;Joel E. Gallant;Edwin DeJesus;Jose R. Arribas;Jose R. Arribas

  • Smoking-Related Health Risks Among Persons With HIV in the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Clinical Trial

    Alan R. Lifson;Jacqueline Neuhaus;Jose Ramon Arribas;Mary van den Berg-Wolf

  • A cohort of patients with COVID-19 in a major teaching hospital in Europe

    Alberto M Borobia;Antonio J Carcas;Francisco Arnalich;Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala

  • Pegylated Ifn-α2b plus ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C in Hiv-infected patients

    Mayte Pérez-Olmeda;Marina Núñez;Miriam Romero;Juan González

  • Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide, Coformulated With Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, and Emtricitabine, in HIV-Infected Patients With Renal Impairment: 48-Week Results From a Single-Arm, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

    Anton Pozniak;Jose R. Arribas;Joseph Gathe;Samir K. Gupta

  • Severe Nucleoside-Associated Lactic Acidosis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients: Report of 12 Cases and Review of the Literature

    Vicente Falcó;Dolors Rodríguez;Esteban Ribera;Esteban Martínez

  • Assessment of Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens for HIV Therapy in Africa

    Nicholas I. Paton;Cissy Kityo;Anne Hoppe;Andrew Reid

  • Heart failure in COVID-19 patients: prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications.

    Juan R Rey;Juan Caro‐Codón;Sandra O. Rosillo;Ángel M. Iniesta

  • Raltegravir once daily or twice daily in previously untreated patients with HIV-1: a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial

    Joseph J. Eron;Jürgen K. Rockstroh;Jacques Reynes;Jaime Andrade-Villanueva

Frequent Co-Authors

Federico Pulido
Federico Pulido Complutense University of Madrid
Pere Domingo
Pere Domingo Autonomous University of Barcelona
Hernando Knobel
Hernando Knobel Autonomous University of Barcelona
Juan Berenguer
Juan Berenguer Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Antonio Rivero
Antonio Rivero Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba
Andrew Hill
Andrew Hill University of Liverpool
Eugenia Negredo
Eugenia Negredo University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
Santiago Moreno
Santiago Moreno Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
José M. Miró
José M. Miró University of Barcelona
Edwin DeJesus
Edwin DeJesus Hanover University of Applied Sciences and Arts

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative medical career paths online is increasingly popular among those seeking flexibility and quicker entry into the healthcare field. Nursing, in particular, offers a variety of routes for advancement through online programs.

For registered nurses who want to earn their doctorate efficiently, quickest dnp program options provide an accelerated path to leadership roles. Those looking for less intensive clinical requirements can consider a dnp program without clinical hours, ideal for nurses interested in education or administration.

If starting your medical journey is your goal, you might be wondering what is the fastest way to become an lpn. Fast-track online LPN programs help students begin a healthcare career quickly and with minimal prerequisites.

For those passionate about mental health, pursuing a fast track mental health nursing pathway can lead to rewarding roles as a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. Online learning makes these advanced degrees more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Jose R. Arribas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles