World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
58
Citations
10892
World Ranking
3455
National Ranking
304

Andrew Hill publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Hill sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 245 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Andrew Hill D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Hill sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Hill is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly within the field of infectious diseases. Their work spans several subfields, including infectious diseases, epidemiology, virology, emergency medicine, and aspects of economics and econometrics related to health.

The primary focus of their research covers a range of topics, notably:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew Hill include:

  • François Venter
  • Jacob Levi
  • Bryony Simmons
  • Junzheng Wang
  • Victoria Pilkington

Andrew Hill has published in several notable journals and venues throughout their career. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • AIDS
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Among recent publications, several papers stand out due to their subject matter and citation impact:

  • "A review of the safety of favipiravir - a potential treatment in the COVID-19 pandemic?" (2020), Journal of Virus Eradication
  • "Dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (ADVANCE): week 96 results from a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial" (2020), The Lancet HIV
  • "The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 95-95-95 targets: worldwide clinical and cost benefits of generic manufacture" (2021), AIDS
  • "Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir compared with standard of care in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with moderate or severe coronavirus infection (COVID-19): a randomized controlled trial" (2020), Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • "The impact of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir or ribavirin in patients with severe COVID-19" (2020), Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Andrew Hill's work predominantly focuses on medicine, with 206 publications in the field. This positions them as a contributor to ongoing research concerning both infectious diseases and the integration of economic perspectives within healthcare policy and pharmaceutical development.

Best Publications

  • Global trends in antiretroviral resistance in treatment-naive individuals with HIV after rollout of antiretroviral treatment in resource-limited settings: a global collaborative study and meta-regression analysis

    Ravindra K Gupta;Michael R Jordan;Binta J Sultan;Andrew Hill

  • Risk of Late Relapse or Reinfection With Hepatitis C Virus After Achieving a Sustained Virological Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Bryony Simmons;Jawaad Saleem;Andrew Hill;Richard D. Riley

  • Virological monitoring and resistance to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy in adults infected with HIV-1 treated under WHO guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ravindra K Gupta;Andrew Hill;Anthony W Sawyer;Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri

  • Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Patients Infected With Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Survival Benefit of Achieving a Sustained Virological Response

    Bryony Simmons;Jawaad Saleem;Katherine Heath;Graham S. Cooke

  • CD4-guided scheduled treatment interruptions compared with continuous therapy for patients infected with HIV-1 : results of the staccato randomised trial

    Jintanat Ananworanich;Angèle Gayet-Ageron;Michelle Le Braz;Wisit Prasithsirikul

  • Minimum Costs for Producing Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antivirals for Use in Large-Scale Treatment Access Programs in Developing Countries

    Andrew Hill;Saye Khoo;Joe Fortunak;Bryony Simmons

  • A review of the safety of favipiravir - a potential treatment in the COVID-19 pandemic?

    Victoria Pilkington;Toby Pepperrell;Andrew Hill

  • Emergence of Drug Resistance in HIV Type 1-Infected Patients after Receipt of First-Line Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

    Ravindra Gupta;Andrew Hill;Anthony W. Sawyer;Deenan Pillay;Deenan Pillay

  • Dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (ADVANCE): week 96 results from a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

    Willem D F Venter;Simiso Sokhela;Bryony Simmons;Michelle Moorhouse

  • The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml.

    Jose R Arribas;Andrzej Horban;Jan Gerstoft;Gerdt Fätkenheuer

  • Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

    Rebekah L. Puls;Janaki Amin;Marcelo Losso;Praphan Phanuphak

  • The future role of CD4 cell count for monitoring antiretroviral therapy

    Nathan Ford;Nathan Ford;Graeme Meintjes;Anton Pozniak;Helen Bygrave

  • Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets.

    Brian Barr Godman;Anna Bucsics;Patricia Vella Bonanno;Wija Oortwijn;Wija Oortwijn

  • The road to elimination of hepatitis C: analysis of cures versus new infections in 91 countries.

    Andrew M. Hill;Sanjay Nath;Bryony Simmons

  • Prioritization of Anti-SARS-Cov-2 Drug Repurposing Opportunities Based on Plasma and Target Site Concentrations Derived from their Established Human Pharmacokinetics.

    Usman Arshad;Henry Pertinez;Helen Box;Lee Tatham

  • Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial.

    Ulrik B.Ulrik Dragsted;Jan Gerstoft;Court Pedersen;Barry Peters

  • Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: is there a true difference in efficacy and safety?

    Andrew Hill;Sophie L Hughes;Dzintars Gotham;Anton L Pozniak

  • The transition to dolutegravir and other new antiretrovirals in low-income and middle-income countries: what are the issues?

    Marco Vitoria;Andrew Hill;Nathan Ford;Meg Doherty

  • The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 95-95-95 targets: worldwide clinical and cost benefits of generic manufacture.

    Katherine Heath;Jacob Levi;Andrew Hill

  • The MONET trial: week 144 analysis of the efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy versus DRV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, for patients with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at baseline.

    J R Arribas;N Clumeck;M Nelson;A Hill

  • Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir compared with standard of care in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with moderate or severe coronavirus infection (COVID-19): a randomized controlled trial.

    Anahita Sadeghi;Ali Ali Asgari;Alireza Norouzi;Zahedin Kheiri

  • Improvement in vitamin D deficiency following antiretroviral regime change: Results from the MONET trial.

    Julie Fox;Barry Peters;Manyu Prakash;Jose Arribas

  • Rapidly declining HIV infection in MSM in central London.

    Nneka Nwokolo;Andrew Hill;Alan McOwan;Anton Pozniak

Frequent Co-Authors

Anton Pozniak
Anton Pozniak London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Jose R. Arribas
Jose R. Arribas Hospital Universitario La Paz
Nathan Ford
Nathan Ford World Health Organization
Saye Khoo
Saye Khoo University of Liverpool
Marta Boffito
Marta Boffito Imperial College London
Mark Nelson
Mark Nelson University of Vermont
Alexandra Calmy
Alexandra Calmy University of Geneva
Brian Gazzard
Brian Gazzard St Bartholomew's Hospital
Kiat Ruxrungtham
Kiat Ruxrungtham Chulalongkorn University
David Back
David Back University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options. Fields like healthcare information management are increasingly vital as data-driven decision-making transforms healthcare. Understanding the healthcare information management salary potential helps gauge return on investment in this rewarding sector.

If you want to pursue a formal education in this area, the best online health information management degree cahiim accredited programs provide credible, flexible learning paths. These programs ensure quality education aligned with industry standards, preparing you for certification and career growth.

For those seeking quicker entry into the healthcare administration field, enrolling in one of the quickest medical billing and coding certificate online programs can be a smart strategy. These certificates open doors to essential roles that keep healthcare operations running smoothly.

More broadly, if you want to explore diverse opportunities within healthcare, learning about what medical degrees can i get online gives insight into flexible and accessible medical education options. This knowledge allows you to choose a path that complements your microbiology background and personal goals.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Hill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles