World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
6671
World Ranking
9080
National Ranking
3258

Matthew Lebsock publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Lebsock sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 142 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Matthew Lebsock D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Lebsock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew Lebsock is affiliated with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the United States. Their research mainly focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong emphasis on Environmental Science. Within these fields, their work delves deeply into several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Earth-Surface Processes, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The scientist's publications have appeared frequently in multiple venues, notably including Atmospheric Measurement Techniques and Zenodo, each with 12 publications. Other venues featuring their work are the Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, and Geophysical Research Letters.

Lebsock's research primarily addresses topics related to:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Precipitation measurement and analysis
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric ozone and climate
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Lebsock include:

  • Spaceborne Cloud and Precipitation Radars: Status, Challenges, and Ways Forward (2020), published in Reviews of Geophysics
  • Validation of a G-Band Differential Absorption Cloud Radar for Humidity Remote Sensing (2020), published in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • G-Band Radar for Humidity and Cloud Remote Sensing (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • To assess marine cloud brightening's technical feasibility, we need to know what to study-and when to stop (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening (2024), published in Science Advances

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Lebsock's work. Frequent co-authors contributing to multiple publications include Ken B. Cooper, Marcin J. Kurowski, Richard Roy, Mark Smalley, and Juan M. Socuéllamos.

Best Publications

  • An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations

    Graeme L. Stephens;Juilin Li;Martin Wild;Carol Anne Clayson

  • CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation

    Graeme L. Stephens;Deborah G. Vane;Simone Tanelli;Eastwood Im

  • CloudSat and CALIPSO within the A-Train: Ten Years of Actively Observing the Earth System

    Graeme Stephens;David Winker;Jacques Pelon;Charles Trepte

  • Snowfall‐driven mass change on the East Antarctic ice sheet

    Carmen Boening;Matthew Lebsock;Felix Landerer;Graeme Stephens

  • The retrieval of warm rain from CloudSat

    Matthew D. Lebsock;Tristan S. L'Ecuyer

  • Multisensor satellite observations of aerosol effects on warm clouds

    Matthew D. Lebsock;Graeme L. Stephens;Christian Kummerow

  • On the precipitation susceptibility of clouds to aerosol perturbations

    Armin Sorooshian;Armin Sorooshian;Armin Sorooshian;Graham Feingold;Matthew D. Lebsock;Hongli Jiang;Hongli Jiang

  • Spaceborne Cloud and Precipitation Radars: Status, Challenges, and Ways Forward.

    Alessandro Battaglia;Alessandro Battaglia;Pavlos Kollias;Pavlos Kollias;Ranvir Dhillon;Richard Roy

  • Status of High latitude precipitation estimates from observations and reanalyses.

    Ali Behrangi;Matthew Christensen;Matthew Christensen;Mark Richardson;Matthew Lebsock

  • The Multisensor Advanced Climatology of Liquid Water Path (MAC-LWP)

    Gregory S. Elsaesser;Gregory S. Elsaesser;Christopher W. O’Dell;Matthew D. Lebsock;Ralf Bennartz

  • Global observations of aerosol impacts on precipitation occurrence in warm maritime clouds

    Tristan L'Ecuyer;Wesley Berg;John Matthew Haynes;Matthew Lebsock

  • On the quantification of oceanic rainfall using spaceborne sensors

    Ali Behrangi;Matthew Lebsock;Sun Wong;Bjorn Lambrigtsen

  • An Update on the Oceanic Precipitation Rate and Its Zonal Distribution in Light of Advanced Observations from Space

    Ali Behrangi;Graeme Stephens;Robert F. Adler;George J. Huffman

  • Frequency and causes of failed MODIS cloud property retrievals for liquid phase clouds over global oceans.

    Hyoun Myoung Cho;Zhibo Zhang;Kerry Meyer;Kerry Meyer;Matthew Lebsock

  • Precipitation driving of droplet concentration variability in marine low clouds

    Robert Wood;David Leon;Matthew Lebsock;Jefferson Snider

  • Microphysical implications of cloud‐precipitation covariance derived from satellite remote sensing

    Matthew Lebsock;Hugh Morrison;Andrew Gettelman

  • A Comparison of Precipitation Occurrence from the NCEP Stage IV QPE Product and theCloudSatCloud Profiling Radar

    Mark Smalley;Tristan L'Ecuyer;Matthew Lebsock;John Haynes

  • Application of active spaceborne remote sensing for understanding biases between passive cloud water path retrievals

    Matthew Lebsock;Hui Su

  • Detecting the Ratio of Rain and Cloud Water in Low-Latitude Shallow Marine Clouds

    Matthew D. Lebsock;Tristan S. L’Ecuyer;Graeme L. Stephens

  • Exposing biases in retrieved low cloud properties from CloudSat: A guide for evaluating observations and climate data

    Matthew W. Christensen;Graeme L. Stephens;Matthew D. Lebsock

  • Retrieval of snowflake microphysical properties from multifrequency radar observations

    Jussi Leinonen;Jussi Leinonen;Matthew D. Lebsock;Simone Tanelli;Ousmane O. Sy

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme L. Stephens
Graeme L. Stephens Jet Propulsion Lab
Tristan L'Ecuyer
Tristan L'Ecuyer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kentaroh Suzuki
Kentaroh Suzuki University of Tokyo
João Paulo Teixeira
João Paulo Teixeira University of Porto
Robert Pincus
Robert Pincus University of Colorado Boulder
Mark I. Richardson
Mark I. Richardson California Institute of Technology
Ali Behrangi
Ali Behrangi University of Arizona
Christian D. Kummerow
Christian D. Kummerow Colorado State University
Brian H. Kahn
Brian H. Kahn California Institute of Technology
Peter Kalmus
Peter Kalmus California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA often leads students to consider complementary or alternative fields that enhance their career prospects. For those interested in leadership within public sectors, programs like the easiest online mpa programs offer flexible pathways to gain crucial administrative skills in a short period.

Alternatively, a strong foundation in social dynamics is essential for understanding environmental impacts on communities. Pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors can equip students with this perspective, broadening the scope of their environmental work.

For professionals seeking advanced education in education leadership or policy without the extensive commitment of a dissertation, finding programs like an edd without dissertation can be a game-changer. These options provide specialized knowledge while maintaining a manageable workload.

Moreover, those already holding an Education Specialist degree might benefit from exploring eds to edd programs to advance their credentials efficiently and access higher-level career opportunities related to environmental education and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Lebsock

Trending Scientists