World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
18110
World Ranking
3767
National Ranking
1436

Robert Pincus publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Pincus sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert Pincus D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Pincus sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Pincus is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. The main subfields of study covered in their work include global and planetary change, atmospheric science, aerospace engineering, oceanography, and applied mathematics.

Their research encompasses a variety of topics related to the atmosphere and climate systems. The key themes in their work are atmospheric aerosols and clouds, climate variability and models, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, and gas dynamics and kinetic theory.

Robert Pincus has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets for their work include the Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Earth System Science Data, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, and Geoscientific Model Development.

Notable recent papers by Robert Pincus reflect a range of atmospheric and climate research topics:

  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • EUREC 4 A, 2021, Earth System Science Data
  • JOANNE: Joint dropsonde Observations of the Atmosphere in tropical North atlaNtic meso-scale Environments, 2021, Earth System Science Data
  • Accelerating Radiation Computations for Dynamical Models With Targeted Machine Learning and Code Optimization, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Measurements from the RV Ronald H. Brown and related platforms as part of the Atlantic Tradewind Ocean-Atmosphere Mesoscale Interaction Campaign (ATOMIC), 2021, Earth System Science Data

In collaborative research, Robert Pincus frequently coauthors with Stefan A. Buehler, C. W. Fairall, Benjamin Fildier, E. J. Mlawer, and Oliviér Boucher. These partnerships reflect a network of ongoing work in atmospheric and Earth system science.

Best Publications

  • Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6

    Bjorn Stevens;Marco Giorgetta;Monika Esch;Thorsten Mauritsen

  • Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2.

    Thorsten Mauritsen;Thorsten Mauritsen;Jürgen Bader;Tobias Becker;Jörg Behrens

  • Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS

    M.D. King;W.P. Menzel;Y.J. Kaufman;D. Tanre

  • The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3

    Leo J. Donner;Bruce L. Wyman;Richard S. Hemler;Larry W. Horowitz

  • Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity

    Sandrine Bony;Bjorn Stevens;Dargan M W Frierson;Christian Jakob

  • COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment

    Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo;M Webb;S Bony;H Chepfer

  • Taking climate model evaluation to the next level

    Veronika Eyring;Veronika Eyring;Peter M. Cox;Gregory M. Flato;Peter J. Gleckler

  • Tuning the climate of a global model

    Thorsten Mauritsen;Bjoern Stevens;Erich Roeckner;Traute Crueger

  • Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements

    M. H. Zhang;W. Y. Lin;S. A. Klein;S. A. Klein;J. T. Bacmeister

  • A fast, flexible, approximate technique for computing radiative transfer in inhomogeneous cloud fields

    Robert Pincus;Howard W. Barker;Jean-Jacques Morcrette

  • Effect of precipitation on the albedo susceptibility of clouds in the marine boundary layer

    Robert Pincus;Marcia B. Baker

  • Impact of a New Radiation Package, McRad, in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System

    J. J. Morcrette;H. W. Barker;J. N. S. Cole;M. J. Iacono

  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models

    Christopher J. Smith;Christopher J. Smith;Ryan J. Kramer;Ryan J. Kramer;Gunnar Myhre;Kari Alterskjær

  • Reconciling Simulated and Observed Views of Clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the Limits of Instrument Simulators

    Robert Pincus;Steven Platnick;Steven A. Ackerman;Richard S. Hemler

  • A First Course on Atmospheric Radiation

    Unknown

  • Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators

    J. E. Kay;B. R. Hillman;B. R. Hillman;S. A. Klein;Y. Zhang

  • Low-Cloud Feedbacks from Cloud-Controlling Factors: A Review

    Stephen A. Klein;Alex Hall;Joel R. Norris;Robert Pincus;Robert Pincus

  • Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6

    Piers M. Forster;Thomas Richardson;Amanda C. Maycock;Christopher J. Smith

  • The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): Experimental Protocol for CMIP6

    Robert Pincus;Robert Pincus;Piers M. Forster;Bjorn Stevens

  • Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator

    Stephen A. Klein;Yuying Zhang;Mark D. Zelinka;Robert Pincus

  • Evaluating the present‐day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models

    Robert Pincus;Crispian P. Batstone;Robert J. Patrick Hofmann;Karl E. Taylor

  • EUREC 4 A

    Bjorn Stevens;Sandrine Bony;David Farrell;Felix Ament

Frequent Co-Authors

Bjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens Max Planck Society
Stephen A. Klein
Stephen A. Klein Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Sandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony Université Paris Cité
Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Thorsten Mauritsen
Thorsten Mauritsen Stockholm University
Aiko Voigt
Aiko Voigt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Piers M. Forster
Piers M. Forster University of Leeds
Marco A. Giorgetta
Marco A. Giorgetta Max Planck Society
Steven Platnick
Steven Platnick Goddard Space Flight Center
Monika Esch
Monika Esch Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs such as eds to edd programs online offer advanced education opportunities focusing on leadership and policy, ideal for those looking to influence environmental education and research.

Professionals aimed at community impact might consider dsw programs online, which combine social work with environmental justice initiatives. These programs prepare graduates to advocate for sustainable and equitable policies effectively.

For students seeking flexibility, the best affordable online general studies degree programs offer multidisciplinary approaches, allowing integration of environmental science with other fields such as business or public administration.

Additionally, some may find it beneficial to pursue one of the easiest bachelor's degree online programs to build foundational knowledge before moving into specialized environmental careers. These options make higher education more accessible without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Pincus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles