World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
34531
World Ranking
13006
National Ranking
695

Jens Fiehler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Fiehler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 966 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jens Fiehler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Fiehler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Fiehler is affiliated with the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Epidemiology, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's research interests include the following main topics:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Jens Fiehler has published extensively, with recent notable papers including:

  • "Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: multicentre, open-label, randomised trial" (2023), published in The Lancet
  • "Challenging the Ischemic Core Concept in Acute Ischemic Stroke Imaging" (2020), published in Stroke
  • "Thrombectomy for Primary Distal Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke" (2021), published in JAMA Neurology
  • "Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials" (2023), published in The Lancet
  • "Global impact of COVID-19 on stroke care" (2021), published in International Journal of Stroke

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jens Fiehler include:

  • Götz Thomalla
  • Lukas Meyer
  • Gabriel Broocks
  • Uta Hanning
  • Helge Kniep

The scientist's work appears prominently in several publication venues, such as:

  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Stroke
  • Clinical Neuroradiology
  • Abstracts
  • European Stroke Journal

Best Publications

  • MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset

    Götz Thomalla;Claus Z. Simonsen;Florent Boutitie;Grethe Andersen

  • Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.

    Hans-Henning Eckstein;Peter Ringleb;Jens-Rainer Allenberg;Jürgen Berger

  • DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study

    Götz Thomalla;Bastian Cheng;Martin Ebinger;Qing Hao

  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Michael D Hill;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K Menon;Raul G Nogueira

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke

    Guillaume Turc;Pervinder Bhogal;Urs Fischer;Pooja Khatri

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE):

    Guillaume Turc;Pervinder Bhogal;Urs Fischer;Pooja Khatri

  • Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis on MRI Parameters and Functional Outcome in Acute Stroke <6 Hours

    J. Röther;P.D. Schellinger;A. Gass;M. Siebler

  • Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN:

    Nils Wahlgren;Tiago Moreira;Patrik Michel;Thorsten Steiner

  • MRI-Based and CT-Based Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke Within and Beyond Established Time Windows: An Analysis of 1210 Patients

    Peter D. Schellinger;Götz Thomalla;Jens Fiehler;Martin Köhrmann

  • Severe ADC Decreases Do Not Predict Irreversible Tissue Damage In Humans

    Jens Fiehler;Mascha Foth;Thomas Kucinski;Renée Knab

  • Outcome and Symptomatic Bleeding Complications of Intravenous Thrombolysis Within 6 Hours in MRI-Selected Stroke Patients Comparison of a German Multicenter Study With the Pooled Data of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS tPA Trials

    Götz Thomalla;Christian Schwark;Jan Sobesky;Erich Bluhmki

  • Bleeding Risk Analysis in Stroke Imaging Before ThromboLysis (BRASIL) Pooled Analysis of T2*-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data From 570 Patients

    Jens Fiehler;Gregory W Albers;Jean-Martin Boulanger;Laurent Derex

  • Negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging identifies acute ischemic stroke at 3 hours or less.

    Götz Thomalla;Philipp Rossbach;Michael Rosenkranz;Susanne Siemonsen

  • Leukoaraiosis is a risk factor for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis for acute stroke.

    Tobias Neumann-Haefelin;Silke Hoelig;Joachim Berkefeld;Jens Fiehler

  • Predictors of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Normalization in Stroke Patients

    Jens Fiehler;Karina Knudsen;Thomas Kucinski;Chelsea S. Kidwell

  • Influence of Stroke Infarct Location on Functional Outcome Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale

    Bastian Cheng;Nils Daniel Forkert;Melissa Zavaglia;Claus C. Hilgetag

  • Hemodynamic Forces Tune the Arrest, Adhesion, and Extravasation of Circulating Tumor Cells

    Gautier Follain;Naël Osmani;Ana Sofia Azevedo;Guillaume Allio

  • Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours of symptom onset: A prospective multicenter observational study.

    Götz Thomalla;Frank Hartmann;Eric Juettler;Eric Juettler;Oliver C. Singer

  • Clinical and angiographic risk factors for stroke and death within 30 days after carotid endarterectomy and stent-protected angioplasty: a subanalysis of the SPACE study.

    Robert Stingele;Jürgen Berger;Karsten Alfke;Hans-Henning Eckstein

  • Prediction of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction by Early Perfusion- and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Götz J. Thomalla;Thomas Kucinski;Volker Schoder;Jens Fiehler

Frequent Co-Authors

Joachim Röther
Joachim Röther Asklepios Klinik Altona
Heinz Handels
Heinz Handels University of Lübeck
Jochen B. Fiebach
Jochen B. Fiebach Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Götz Thomalla
Götz Thomalla Universität Hamburg
Werner Hacke
Werner Hacke Heidelberg University
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Peter A. Ringleb
Peter A. Ringleb University Hospital Heidelberg
Peter D. Schellinger
Peter D. Schellinger Ruhr University Bochum
Achim Gass
Achim Gass Heidelberg University
Christian Gerloff
Christian Gerloff University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career isn't limited to traditional MD programs. Many students consider flexible pathways like earning a BSN after becoming a registered nurse. The rn to bsn online cost is often more affordable and can be navigated while working, making it an attractive route for current RNs seeking advancement.

For those without a nursing background, alternative options are available. The direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online are designed for individuals with non-nursing degrees who want to transition into advanced nursing roles, providing a fast track into healthcare.

Admission standards and prerequisites vary widely across programs. Students searching for more accessible undergraduate routes can discover easy nursing programs to get into, which may have flexible entry requirements, making them ideal for those new to the field.

Not everyone pursuing healthcare needs to work in direct patient care. Technical roles such as medical billing and coding also offer rewarding opportunities. Consider reviewing medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid for accessible, accredited programs with financial support available.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Fiehler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles