World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francesco Marcelloni

Francesco Marcelloni

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 43 7968 7741 210 208 267 8074

Francesco Marcelloni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francesco Marcelloni between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francesco Marcelloni published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 15 of the 317 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 3 publications
1993 2026

317 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francesco Marcelloni: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 3
1994 2
1995 5
1996 1
1997 5
1998 7
1999 9
2000 13
2001 9
2002 9
2003 7
2004 9
2005 7
2006 10
2007 12
2008 14
2009 15
2010 13
2011 19
2012 8
2013 11
2014 10
2015 6
2016 9
2017 8
2018 6
2019 11
2020 10
2021 10
2022 12
2023 16
2024 16
2025 12
2026 3
Total 317
Download as CSV

Francesco Marcelloni publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Marcelloni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 262–271 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 267 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301 267
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Francesco Marcelloni D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Marcelloni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Francesco Marcelloni is affiliated with the University of Pisa in Italy and has published extensively in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans several subfields, including Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their work covers diverse topics, notably:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification

Marcelloni has contributed to recent papers that reflect their research focus and collaboration network. These include:

  • "Twitter as a sentinel tool to monitor public opinion on vaccination: an opinion mining analysis from September 2016 to August 2017 in Italy" (2020, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics)
  • "Federated Learning of Explainable AI Models in 6G Systems: Towards Secure and Automated Vehicle Networking" (2022, Information)
  • "TSF-DBSCAN: A Novel Fuzzy Density-Based Approach for Clustering Unbounded Data Streams" (2020, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems)
  • "Exploring the relations between supply chain performance and organizational culture: A fuzzy grey group decision model" (2020, International Journal of Production Economics)
  • "The Hexa-X Project Vision on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Driven Communication and Computation Co-Design for 6G" (2023, IEEE Access)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Pietro Ducange (31 publications)
  • Alessandro Renda (27 publications)
  • José Luis Corcuera Bárcena (14 publications)
  • Alessio Bechini (13 publications)
  • Alessandro Bondielli (12 publications)

Marcelloni's research outputs are published mainly in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 7 publications
  • IEEE Access with 6 publications
  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) with 2 publications
  • Expert Systems with Applications with 2 publications
  • SSRN Electronic Journal with 2 publications

The areas of study and breadth of publications indicate an emphasis on applying artificial intelligence methods to complex systems, with a notable interest in explainability and security in emerging technological ecosystems like 6G networking. The mix of interdisciplinary topics also reflects integration of social science perspectives, particularly in areas dealing with misinformation and public opinion monitoring.

Best Publications

  • A survey on fake news and rumour detection techniques

    Alessandro Bondielli;Alessandro Bondielli;Francesco Marcelloni

  • Real-Time Detection of Traffic From Twitter Stream Analysis

    Eleonora D'Andrea;Pietro Ducange;Beatrice Lazzerini;Francesco Marcelloni

  • Patterns and technologies for enabling supply chain traceability through collaborative e-business

    Alessio Bechini;Mario G. C. A. Cimino;Francesco Marcelloni;Andrea Tomasi

  • A Simple Algorithm for Data Compression in Wireless Sensor Networks

    F. Marcelloni;M. Vecchio

  • Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Why, When, What for, and Where to?

    Alberto Fernandez;Francisco Herrera;Oscar Cordon;Maria Jose del Jesus

  • Detection of traffic congestion and incidents from GPS trace analysis

    Eleonora D'Andrea;Francesco Marcelloni

  • An Efficient Lossless Compression Algorithm for Tiny Nodes of Monitoring Wireless Sensor Networks

    Francesco Marcelloni;Massimo Vecchio

  • A Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach to Concurrently Learn Rule and Data Bases of Linguistic Fuzzy-Rule-Based Systems

    R. Alcala;P. Ducange;F. Herrera;B. Lazzerini

  • A genetic algorithm for generating optimal assembly plans

    Beatrice Lazzerini;Francesco Marcelloni

  • Monitoring the public opinion about the vaccination topic from tweets analysis

    Eleonora D'Andrea;Pietro Ducange;Alessio Bechini;Alessandro Renda;Alessandro Renda

  • On Distributed Fuzzy Decision Trees for Big Data

    Armando Segatori;Francesco Marcelloni;Witold Pedrycz

  • Enabling energy-efficient and lossy-aware data compression in wireless sensor networks by multi-objective evolutionary optimization

    Francesco Marcelloni;Massimo Vecchio

  • A MapReduce solution for associative classification of big data

    Alessio Bechini;Francesco Marcelloni;Armando Segatori

  • Generation of Optimized Assembly Sequences Using Genetic Algorithms

    G. Dini;F. Failli;B. Lazzerini;F. Marcelloni

  • An intelligent system for detecting faults in photovoltaic fields

    Pietro Ducange;Michela Fazzolari;Beatrice Lazzerini;Francesco Marcelloni

  • A Pareto-based multi-objective evolutionary approach to the identification of Mamdani fuzzy systems

    Marco Cococcioni;Pietro Ducange;Beatrice Lazzerini;Francesco Marcelloni

  • Context adaptation of fuzzy systems through a multi-objective evolutionary approach based on a novel interpretability index

    Alessio Botta;Beatrice Lazzerini;Francesco Marcelloni;Dan C. Stefanescu

  • Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization of Type-2 Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems for Financial Data Classification

    Michela Antonelli;Dario Bernardo;Hani Hagras;Francesco Marcelloni

  • Multi-objective genetic fuzzy classifiers for imbalanced and cost-sensitive datasets

    Pietro Ducange;Beatrice Lazzerini;Francesco Marcelloni

  • Twitter as a sentinel tool to monitor public opinion on vaccination: an opinion mining analysis from September 2016 to August 2017 in Italy.

    Lara Tavoschi;Filippo Quattrone;Eleonora D'Andrea;Pietro Ducange

Frequent Co-Authors

Beatrice Lazzerini
Beatrice Lazzerini University of Pisa
Francisco Herrera
Francisco Herrera University of Granada
Witold Pedrycz
Witold Pedrycz University of Alberta
Bedir Tekinerdogan
Bedir Tekinerdogan Wageningen University & Research
Giuseppe Anastasi
Giuseppe Anastasi University of Pisa
Giovanna Castellano
Giovanna Castellano University of Bari Aldo Moro
Ajith Abraham
Ajith Abraham Sai University
Vincenzo Loia
Vincenzo Loia University of Salerno
Hani Hagras
Hani Hagras University of Essex
Danilo De Rossi
Danilo De Rossi University of Pisa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to numerous interdisciplinary and advanced educational opportunities. Many students pursuing this field consider various affordable online graduate programs to further specialize their expertise or expand their career options.

For those interested in management roles, the cheapest executive mba programs online offer a cost-effective way to gain leadership and business skills. Similarly, tech professionals with an eye on information management might be attracted to a master's in library science online cost, which can complement a CS background in data organization or archiving.

If your goal is further academic achievement, checking out the cheapest online graduate programs can reveal a wide range of budget-friendly master’s choices in technology, science, and adjacent fields. For those aspiring to high-level leadership, affordable doctoral programs in fields like IT or education may be found among the most affordable doctoral programs in leadership.

Balancing cost, flexibility, and career relevance is key. These linked resources can help you identify the right pathway as you plan your next step in computing or related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco Marcelloni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles