World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Douglas L. Hintzman

Douglas L. Hintzman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
13293
World Ranking
6822
National Ranking
3700

Douglas L. Hintzman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas L. Hintzman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas L. Hintzman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas L. Hintzman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1988 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Douglas L. Hintzman is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. The scientist's work has been recognized through prestigious awards, including being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1988, an honor received twice in the same year according to the available data.

There is no available information on specific research papers, which limits the ability to detail particular publications or their venues. Similarly, data on co-authors, frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, and main research topics are not provided.

The lack of documented papers and publication details means that no specific scientific contributions or research themes can be cited. However, the recognition by the AAAS indicates acknowledged contributions to the scientific community, although the exact nature of these contributions is unspecified.

This profile reflects the available documented information on Douglas L. Hintzman without extrapolating beyond provided data.

Best Publications

  • "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Theoretical implications of the spacing effect.

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall.

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Tim Curran

  • Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.

    Tim Curran;Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Repetition and Memory1

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis.

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Richard A. Block

  • HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY: CONNECTIONS AND DISSOCIATIONS

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Orientation in cognitive maps.

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Carla S. O'Dell;David R. Arndt

  • Research Strategy in the Study of Memory: Fads, Fallacies, and the Search for the "Coordinates of Truth".

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • The psychology of learning and memory

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: repetition and recursive reminding.

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Memory for mode of input

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Richard A. Block;Norman R. Inskeep

  • Articulatory coding in short-term memory

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall

    Douglas L. Hintzman;David A. Caulton;Daniel J. Levitin

  • Apparent frequency as a function of frequency and the spacing of repetitions.

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Differential forgetting of prototypes and old instances: Simulation by an exemplar-based classification model

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Genevieve Ludlam

  • Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval.

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Jeffrey J. Summers;Richard A. Block

  • Simpson's paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval.

    Douglas L. Hintzman

  • Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?

    Douglas L. Hintzman;Tim Curran;Brian Oppy

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Block
Richard A. Block Montana State University
Tim Curran
Tim Curran University of Colorado Boulder
Jeffery J. Summers
Jeffery J. Summers Liverpool John Moores University
Daniel J. Levitin
Daniel J. Levitin McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens many doors, especially when it comes to flexible online study and diverse career paths. Students interested in becoming counselors, therapists, or mental health professionals can benefit from the variety of affordable online options now available across the U.S.

Cost is often a major factor when choosing a program. For those seeking budget-friendly options, several regions stand out. For example, students can find affordable counseling degrees in Tempe that offer strong academic support at a lower price point. In the South, the cheapest counseling programs in Texas provide rigorous training without the high tuition costs often found elsewhere.

Other regions, such as the Mountain West, offer chances to study in robust programs like the cheapest counseling programs in Utah. Meanwhile, those in the Midwest can consider the cheapest counseling programs in Wisconsin, which combine affordability with quality instruction.

With these accessible options, students can more easily embark on careers in mental health, school counseling, addiction recovery, and beyond—all without straining their finances.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas L. Hintzman

Recently Published Articles